Methodological reflections for AI alignment research using human
feedback
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2301.06859v1
- Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2022 14:27:33 GMT
- Title: Methodological reflections for AI alignment research using human
feedback
- Authors: Thilo Hagendorff, Sarah Fabi
- Abstract summary: AI alignment aims to investigate whether AI technologies align with human interests and values and function in a safe and ethical manner.
LLMs have the potential to exhibit unintended behavior due to their ability to learn and adapt in ways that are difficult to predict.
- Score: 0.0
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: The field of artificial intelligence (AI) alignment aims to investigate
whether AI technologies align with human interests and values and function in a
safe and ethical manner. AI alignment is particularly relevant for large
language models (LLMs), which have the potential to exhibit unintended behavior
due to their ability to learn and adapt in ways that are difficult to predict.
In this paper, we discuss methodological challenges for the alignment problem
specifically in the context of LLMs trained to summarize texts. In particular,
we focus on methods for collecting reliable human feedback on summaries to
train a reward model which in turn improves the summarization model. We
conclude by suggesting specific improvements in the experimental design of
alignment studies for LLMs' summarization capabilities.
Related papers
- Adaptive Alignment: Dynamic Preference Adjustments via Multi-Objective Reinforcement Learning for Pluralistic AI [4.80825466957272]
We propose an approach for aligning AI with diverse and shifting user preferences through Multi Objective Reinforcement Learning (MORL)
In this paper, we introduce the proposed framework for this approach, outline its anticipated advantages and assumptions, and discuss technical details about the implementation.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-31T04:46:52Z) - Seeing Eye to AI: Human Alignment via Gaze-Based Response Rewards for Large Language Models [46.09562860220433]
We introduce GazeReward, a novel framework that integrates implicit feedback -- and specifically eye-tracking (ET) data -- into the Reward Model (RM)
Our approach significantly improves the accuracy of the RM on established human preference datasets.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-02T13:24:56Z) - Data Analysis in the Era of Generative AI [56.44807642944589]
This paper explores the potential of AI-powered tools to reshape data analysis, focusing on design considerations and challenges.
We explore how the emergence of large language and multimodal models offers new opportunities to enhance various stages of data analysis workflow.
We then examine human-centered design principles that facilitate intuitive interactions, build user trust, and streamline the AI-assisted analysis workflow across multiple apps.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-09-27T06:31:03Z) - Explanation, Debate, Align: A Weak-to-Strong Framework for Language Model Generalization [0.6629765271909505]
This paper introduces a novel approach to model alignment through weak-to-strong generalization in the context of language models.
Our results suggest that this facilitation-based approach not only enhances model performance but also provides insights into the nature of model alignment.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-09-11T15:16:25Z) - RLHF Deciphered: A Critical Analysis of Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback for LLMs [49.386699863989335]
Training large language models (LLMs) to serve as effective assistants for humans requires careful consideration.
A promising approach is reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF), which leverages human feedback to update the model in accordance with human preferences.
In this paper, we analyze RLHF through the lens of reinforcement learning principles to develop an understanding of its fundamentals.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-04-12T15:54:15Z) - Opening the Black-Box: A Systematic Review on Explainable AI in Remote Sensing [51.524108608250074]
Black-box machine learning approaches have become a dominant modeling paradigm for knowledge extraction in remote sensing.
We perform a systematic review to identify the key trends in the field and shed light on novel explainable AI approaches.
We also give a detailed outlook on the challenges and promising research directions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-21T13:19:58Z) - Can AI Serve as a Substitute for Human Subjects in Software Engineering
Research? [24.39463126056733]
This vision paper proposes a novel approach to qualitative data collection in software engineering research by harnessing the capabilities of artificial intelligence (AI)
We explore the potential of AI-generated synthetic text as an alternative source of qualitative data.
We discuss the prospective development of new foundation models aimed at emulating human behavior in observational studies and user evaluations.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-11-18T14:05:52Z) - Post Hoc Explanations of Language Models Can Improve Language Models [43.2109029463221]
We present a novel framework, Amplifying Model Performance by Leveraging In-Context Learning with Post Hoc Explanations (AMPLIFY)
We leverage post hoc explanation methods which output attribution scores (explanations) capturing the influence of each of the input features on model predictions.
Our framework, AMPLIFY, leads to prediction accuracy improvements of about 10-25% over a wide range of tasks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-05-19T04:46:04Z) - Principle-Driven Self-Alignment of Language Models from Scratch with
Minimal Human Supervision [84.31474052176343]
Recent AI-assistant agents, such as ChatGPT, rely on supervised fine-tuning (SFT) with human annotations and reinforcement learning from human feedback to align the output with human intentions.
This dependence can significantly constrain the true potential of AI-assistant agents due to the high cost of obtaining human supervision.
We propose a novel approach called SELF-ALIGN, which combines principle-driven reasoning and the generative power of LLMs for the self-alignment of AI agents with minimal human supervision.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-05-04T17:59:28Z) - Counterfactual Explanations as Interventions in Latent Space [62.997667081978825]
Counterfactual explanations aim to provide to end users a set of features that need to be changed in order to achieve a desired outcome.
Current approaches rarely take into account the feasibility of actions needed to achieve the proposed explanations.
We present Counterfactual Explanations as Interventions in Latent Space (CEILS), a methodology to generate counterfactual explanations.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-06-14T20:48:48Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.