Which Pretrain Samples to Rehearse when Finetuning Pretrained Models?

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2402.08096v1
• Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2024 22:32:12 GMT
• Title: Which Pretrain Samples to Rehearse when Finetuning Pretrained Models?
• Authors: Andrew Bai, Chih-Kuan Yeh, Cho-Jui Hsieh, Ankur Taly
• Abstract summary: Fine-tuning pretrained models on specific tasks is now the de facto approach for text and vision tasks. A known pitfall of this approach is the forgetting of pretraining knowledge that happens during finetuning. We propose a novel sampling scheme, mix-cd, that identifies and prioritizes samples that actually face forgetting.
• Score: 60.59376487151964
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
• Abstract: Fine-tuning pretrained foundational models on specific tasks is now the de facto approach for text and vision tasks. A known pitfall of this approach is the forgetting of pretraining knowledge that happens during finetuning. Rehearsing samples randomly from the pretrain dataset is a common approach to alleviate such forgetting. However, we find that random mixing unintentionally includes samples which are not (yet) forgotten or unlearnable by the model. We propose a novel sampling scheme, mix-cd, that identifies and prioritizes samples that actually face forgetting, which we call collateral damage. Since directly identifying collateral damage samples is computationally expensive, we propose a procedure to estimate the distribution of such samples by tracking the statistics of finetuned samples. Our approach is lightweight, easy to implement, and can be seamlessly integrated into existing models, offering an effective means to retain pretrain performance without additional computational costs.

Related papers

• Learning Augmentation Policies from A Model Zoo for Time Series Forecasting [58.66211334969299]
  We introduce AutoTSAug, a learnable data augmentation method based on reinforcement learning. By augmenting the marginal samples with a learnable policy, AutoTSAug substantially improves forecasting performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-10T07:34:19Z)
• DistPred: A Distribution-Free Probabilistic Inference Method for Regression and Forecasting [14.390842560217743]
  We propose a novel approach called DistPred for regression and forecasting tasks. We transform proper scoring rules that measure the discrepancy between the predicted distribution and the target distribution into a differentiable discrete form. This allows the model to sample numerous samples in a single forward pass to estimate the potential distribution of the response variable.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-17T10:33:00Z)
• DE-CROP: Data-efficient Certified Robustness for Pretrained Classifiers [21.741026088202126]
  We propose a novel way to certify the robustness of pretrained models using only a few training samples. Our proposed approach generates class-boundary and interpolated samples corresponding to each training sample. We obtain significant improvements over the baseline on multiple benchmark datasets and also report similar performance under the challenging black box setup.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-17T10:41:18Z)
• Forgetting Data from Pre-trained GANs [28.326418377665345]
  We investigate how to post-edit a model after training so that it forgets certain kinds of samples. We provide three different algorithms for GANs that differ on how the samples to be forgotten are described. Our algorithms are capable of forgetting data while retaining high generation quality at a fraction of the cost of full re-training.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-29T03:46:16Z)
• Boost Test-Time Performance with Closed-Loop Inference [85.43516360332646]
  We propose to predict hard-classified test samples in a looped manner to boost the model performance. We first devise a filtering criterion to identify those hard-classified test samples that need additional inference loops. For each hard sample, we construct an additional auxiliary learning task based on its original top-$K$ predictions to calibrate the model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-21T10:20:21Z)
• Saliency Grafting: Innocuous Attribution-Guided Mixup with Calibrated Label Mixing [104.630875328668]
  Mixup scheme suggests mixing a pair of samples to create an augmented training sample. We present a novel, yet simple Mixup-variant that captures the best of both worlds.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-12-16T11:27:48Z)
• Jo-SRC: A Contrastive Approach for Combating Noisy Labels [58.867237220886885]
  We propose a noise-robust approach named Jo-SRC (Joint Sample Selection and Model Regularization based on Consistency) Specifically, we train the network in a contrastive learning manner. Predictions from two different views of each sample are used to estimate its "likelihood" of being clean or out-of-distribution.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-03-24T07:26:07Z)
• One for More: Selecting Generalizable Samples for Generalizable ReID Model [92.40951770273972]
  This paper proposes a one-for-more training objective that takes the generalization ability of selected samples as a loss function. Our proposed one-for-more based sampler can be seamlessly integrated into the ReID training framework.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-12-10T06:37:09Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.