Leveraging junk information to enhance the quantum error mitigation

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2402.10480v1
• Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2024 07:01:18 GMT
• Title: Leveraging junk information to enhance the quantum error mitigation
• Authors: Ruixia Wang, Xiaosi Xu, Fei Yan, Xiaoxiao Xiao, Ying Li, Xiaoxia Cai, Haifeng Yu
• Abstract summary: We introduce a quantum error mitigation method named Self-Trained Quantum Noise Filter (SQNF) Our numerical results demonstrate that the proposed method can significantly reduce the infidelity of population distributions.
• Score: 8.049186254119121
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Noise in quantum information processing poses a significant obstacle to achieving precise results. Quantum error mitigation techniques are crucial for improving the accuracy of experimental expectation values in this process. In the experiments, it is commonly observed that some measured events violate certain principles, such as symmetry constraints. These events can be considered junk information and should be discarded in a post-selection process. In this work, we introduce a quantum error mitigation method named Self-Trained Quantum Noise Filter (SQNF), which leverages the junk information to differentiate errors from the experimental population distributions, thereby aiming to approximate the error-free distribution. Our numerical results demonstrate that the proposed method can significantly reduce the infidelity of population distributions compared to the traditional post-selection method. Notably, the infidelity reduction is achieved without additional experimental resource consumption. Our method is scalable and applicable to multi-qubit computing systems.

Related papers

• Quantum Internet: Resource Estimation for Entanglement Routing [0.0]
  We consider the problem of estimating the physical resources required for routing entanglement in a quantum network. We propose a novel way of accounting for experimental errors in the purification process. We show that the approximation works reasonably well over a wide-range of errors.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-14T13:50:39Z)
• Calibrated Uncertainty Quantification for Operator Learning via Conformal Prediction [95.75771195913046]
  We propose a risk-controlling quantile neural operator, a distribution-free, finite-sample functional calibration conformal prediction method. We provide a theoretical calibration guarantee on the coverage rate, defined as the expected percentage of points on the function domain. Empirical results on a 2D Darcy flow and a 3D car surface pressure prediction task validate our theoretical results.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-02T23:43:28Z)
• Scalable quantum measurement error mitigation via conditional independence and transfer learning [0.951828574518325]
  Mitigating measurement errors in quantum systems without relying on quantum error correction is critical for the practical development of quantum technology. Deep learning-based quantum measurement error mitigation has exhibited advantages over the linear inversion method due to its capability to correct non-linear noise. We propose a scalable quantum measurement error mitigation method that leverages the conditional independence of distant qubits and incorporates transfer learning techniques.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-01T06:39:01Z)
• Robust design under uncertainty in quantum error mitigation [0.8258451067861933]
  Classical post-processing of quantum outcomes is a popular approach for error mitigation. We propose general and unbiased methods for quantifying the uncertainty and error of error-mitigated observables by sampling error mitigation outcomes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-11T14:48:03Z)
• Transition Role of Entangled Data in Quantum Machine Learning [51.6526011493678]
  Entanglement serves as the resource to empower quantum computing. Recent progress has highlighted its positive impact on learning quantum dynamics. We establish a quantum no-free-lunch (NFL) theorem for learning quantum dynamics using entangled data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-06T08:06:43Z)
• Quantum Conformal Prediction for Reliable Uncertainty Quantification in Quantum Machine Learning [47.991114317813555]
  Quantum models implement implicit probabilistic predictors that produce multiple random decisions for each input through measurement shots. This paper proposes to leverage such randomness to define prediction sets for both classification and regression that provably capture the uncertainty of the model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-06T22:05:21Z)
• Importance sampling for stochastic quantum simulations [68.8204255655161]
  We introduce the qDrift protocol, which builds random product formulas by sampling from the Hamiltonian according to the coefficients. We show that the simulation cost can be reduced while achieving the same accuracy, by considering the individual simulation cost during the sampling stage. Results are confirmed by numerical simulations performed on a lattice nuclear effective field theory.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-12T15:06:32Z)
• Shadow Distillation: Quantum Error Mitigation with Classical Shadows for Near-Term Quantum Processors [2.3339135709418817]
  Mitigating errors in quantum information processing devices is especially important in the absence of fault tolerance. Here, we use classical shadows and randomized measurements to circumvent the need for coherent access to multiple copies at an exponential cost. We optimize measurement resources under realistic experimental constraints and apply our method to an experiment preparing Greenberger-Horne-Zeilinger (GHZ) state with trapped ions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-14T17:14:56Z)
• Measuring NISQ Gate-Based Qubit Stability Using a 1+1 Field Theory and Cycle Benchmarking [50.8020641352841]
  We study coherent errors on a quantum hardware platform using a transverse field Ising model Hamiltonian as a sample user application. We identify inter-day and intra-day qubit calibration drift and the impacts of quantum circuit placement on groups of qubits in different physical locations on the processor. This paper also discusses how these measurements can provide a better understanding of these types of errors and how they may improve efforts to validate the accuracy of quantum computations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-01-08T23:12:55Z)
• Crosstalk Suppression for Fault-tolerant Quantum Error Correction with Trapped Ions [62.997667081978825]
  We present a study of crosstalk errors in a quantum-computing architecture based on a single string of ions confined by a radio-frequency trap, and manipulated by individually-addressed laser beams. This type of errors affects spectator qubits that, ideally, should remain unaltered during the application of single- and two-qubit quantum gates addressed at a different set of active qubits. We microscopically model crosstalk errors from first principles and present a detailed study showing the importance of using a coherent vs incoherent error modelling and, moreover, discuss strategies to actively suppress this crosstalk at the gate level.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-12-21T14:20:40Z)
• Multi-exponential Error Extrapolation and Combining Error Mitigation Techniques for NISQ Applications [0.0]
  Noise in quantum hardware remains the biggest roadblock for the implementation of quantum computers. Error extrapolation is an error mitigation technique that has been successfully implemented experimentally. We extend this to multi-exponential error extrapolation and provide more rigorous proof for its effectiveness under Pauli noise.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-07-02T17:18:47Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.