Magic Mirror on the Wall, How to Benchmark Quantum Error Correction Codes, Overall ?

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2402.11105v3
• Date: Tue, 5 Mar 2024 00:23:07 GMT
• Title: Magic Mirror on the Wall, How to Benchmark Quantum Error Correction Codes, Overall ?
• Authors: Avimita Chatterjee and Swaroop Ghosh
• Abstract summary: Quantum Error Correction Codes (QECCs) are pivotal in advancing quantum computing by protecting quantum states against the adverse effects of noise and errors. Despite significant improvements in the field of QECCs, a unified methodology for evaluating them on a consistent basis has remained elusive. This paper presents the first benchmarking framework for QECCs, introducing a set of universal parameters. We develop a systematic strategy for selecting QECCs that adapts to the specific requirements of a given scenario, facilitating a tailored approach to quantum error correction.
• Score: 2.77390041716769
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
• Abstract: Quantum Error Correction Codes (QECCs) are pivotal in advancing quantum computing by protecting quantum states against the adverse effects of noise and errors. With a variety of QECCs developed, including new developments and modifications of existing ones, selecting an appropriate QECC tailored to specific conditions is crucial. Despite significant improvements in the field of QECCs, a unified methodology for evaluating them on a consistent basis has remained elusive. Addressing this gap, this paper presents the first benchmarking framework for QECCs, introducing a set of universal parameters. By evaluating eight prominent QECCs, we propose a comprehensive suite of eight parameters for their analysis. Our methodology establishes a universal benchmarking approach and highlights the complexity of quantum error correction, indicating that the choice of a QECC depends on the unique requirements and limitations of each scenario. Furthermore, we develop a systematic strategy for selecting QECCs that adapts to the specific requirements of a given scenario, facilitating a tailored approach to quantum error correction. Additionally, we introduce a novel QECC recommendation tool that assesses the characteristics of a given scenario provided by the user, subsequently recommending a spectrum of QECCs from most to least suitable, along with the maximum achievable distance for each code. This tool is designed to be adaptable, allowing for the inclusion of new QECCs and the modification of their parameters with minimal effort, ensuring its relevance in the evolving landscape of quantum computing.

Related papers

• Strategic Code: A Unified Spatio-Temporal Framework for Quantum Error-Correction [0.0]
  Quantum error-correcting code (QECC) is the central ingredient in fault-tolerant quantum information processing. An emerging paradigm of dynamical QECC shows that one can robustly encode logical information both temporally and spatially. An overarching theory of how dynamical Qs achieve fault-tolerance is lacking.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-27T18:03:00Z)
• Equivalence Checking of Parameterised Quantum Circuits [13.796569260568939]
  We propose a novel compact representation for PQCs based on tensor decision diagrams. We present an algorithm for verifying PQC equivalence without the need for instantiation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-29T06:25:00Z)
• Bayesian Parameterized Quantum Circuit Optimization (BPQCO): A task and hardware-dependent approach [49.89480853499917]
  Variational quantum algorithms (VQA) have emerged as a promising quantum alternative for solving optimization and machine learning problems. In this paper, we experimentally demonstrate the influence of the circuit design on the performance obtained for two classification problems. We also study the degradation of the obtained circuits in the presence of noise when simulating real quantum computers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-17T11:00:12Z)
• Q-Embroidery: A Study on Weaving Quantum Error Correction into the Fabric of Quantum Classifiers [2.348041867134616]
  This study makes a pioneering contribution by applying quantum error correction codes (QECCs) for complex, multi-qubit classification tasks. We implement 1-qubit and 2-qubit quantum classifiers with QECCs, specifically the Steane code, and the distance 3 & 5 surface codes to analyze 2-dimensional and 4-dimensional datasets. Results emphasize that the effectiveness of a QECC in practical scenarios depends on various factors, including qubit availability, desired accuracy, and the specific types and levels of physical errors.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-16T23:22:47Z)
• Deep Quantum Error Correction [73.54643419792453]
  Quantum error correction codes (QECC) are a key component for realizing the potential of quantum computing. In this work, we efficiently train novel emphend-to-end deep quantum error decoders. The proposed method demonstrates the power of neural decoders for QECC by achieving state-of-the-art accuracy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-27T08:16:26Z)
• Potential and limitations of quantum extreme learning machines [55.41644538483948]
  We present a framework to model QRCs and QELMs, showing that they can be concisely described via single effective measurements. Our analysis paves the way to a more thorough understanding of the capabilities and limitations of both QELMs and QRCs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-03T09:32:28Z)
• Circuit Symmetry Verification Mitigates Quantum-Domain Impairments [69.33243249411113]
  We propose circuit-oriented symmetry verification that are capable of verifying the commutativity of quantum circuits without the knowledge of the quantum state. In particular, we propose the Fourier-temporal stabilizer (STS) technique, which generalizes the conventional quantum-domain formalism to circuit-oriented stabilizers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-12-27T21:15:35Z)
• Error Mitigation for Deep Quantum Optimization Circuits by Leveraging Problem Symmetries [2.517903855792476]
  We introduce an application-specific approach for mitigating the errors in QAOA evolution by leveraging the symmetries present in the classical objective function to be optimized. Specifically, the QAOA state is projected into the symmetry-restricted subspace, with projection being performed either at the end of the circuit or throughout the evolution. Our approach improves the fidelity of the QAOA state, thereby increasing both the accuracy of the sample estimate of the QAOA objective and the probability of sampling the binary string corresponding to that objective value.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-08T14:40:48Z)
• Q-Match: Iterative Shape Matching via Quantum Annealing [64.74942589569596]
  Finding shape correspondences can be formulated as an NP-hard quadratic assignment problem (QAP) This paper proposes Q-Match, a new iterative quantum method for QAPs inspired by the alpha-expansion algorithm. Q-Match can be applied for shape matching problems iteratively, on a subset of well-chosen correspondences, allowing us to scale to real-world problems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-06T17:59:38Z)
• Using Quantum Metrological Bounds in Quantum Error Correction: A Simple Proof of the Approximate Eastin-Knill Theorem [77.34726150561087]
  We present a proof of the approximate Eastin-Knill theorem, which connects the quality of a quantum error-correcting code with its ability to achieve a universal set of logical gates. Our derivation employs powerful bounds on the quantum Fisher information in generic quantum metrological protocols.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-24T17:58:10Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.