Navigating the Dual Facets: A Comprehensive Evaluation of Sequential Memory Editing in Large Language Models

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2402.11122v1
• Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2024 23:08:55 GMT
• Title: Navigating the Dual Facets: A Comprehensive Evaluation of Sequential Memory Editing in Large Language Models
• Abstract summary: Two mainstream ME methods exist: parameter-modifying ME and parameter-preserving ME. This study explores how ME affects a wide range of fundamental capabilities of Large Language Models (LLMs) under sequential editing.
• Score: 37.91572705169647
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Memory Editing (ME) has emerged as an efficient method to modify erroneous facts or inject new facts into Large Language Models (LLMs). Two mainstream ME methods exist: parameter-modifying ME and parameter-preserving ME (integrating extra modules while preserving original parameters). Regrettably, previous studies on ME evaluation have two critical limitations: (i) evaluating LLMs with single edit only, neglecting the need for continuous editing, and (ii) evaluations focusing solely on basic factual triples, overlooking broader LLM capabilities like logical reasoning and reading understanding. This study addresses these limitations with contributions threefold: (i) We explore how ME affects a wide range of fundamental capabilities of LLMs under sequential editing. Experimental results reveal an intriguing phenomenon: Most parameter-modifying ME consistently degrade performance across all tasks after a few sequential edits. In contrast, parameter-preserving ME effectively maintains LLMs' fundamental capabilities but struggles to accurately recall edited knowledge presented in a different format. (ii) We extend our evaluation to different editing settings, such as layers to edit, model size, instruction tuning, etc. Experimental findings indicate several strategies that can potentially mitigate the adverse effects of ME. (iii) We further explain why parameter-modifying ME damages LLMs from three dimensions: parameter changes after editing, language modeling capability, and the in-context learning capability. Our in-depth study advocates more careful use of ME in real-world scenarios.

Related papers

• MEMOIR: Lifelong Model Editing with Minimal Overwrite and Informed Retention for LLMs [82.34547399693966]
  Existing methods for lifelong model editing compromise generalization, interfere with past edits, or fail to scale to long editing sequences.<n>We propose MEMOIR, a novel scalable framework that injects knowledge through a residual memory.<n>MeMOIR confines each edit to a distinct subset of the memory parameters, minimizing interference among edits.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-09T16:16:42Z)
• NAMET: Robust Massive Model Editing via Noise-Aware Memory Optimization [7.647276551638579]
  NAMET (Noise-aware Model Editing in Transformers) is a simple yet effective method that introduces noise during memory extraction via a one-line modification to MEMIT.<n>Experiments across six large language models and three datasets demonstrate that NAMET consistently outperforms existing methods when editing thousands of facts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-17T07:00:02Z)
• Knowledge Updating? No More Model Editing! Just Selective Contextual Reasoning [38.018263569983226]
  We provide an evaluation of ten model editing methods along four dimensions: reliability, generalization, locality, and portability. We then propose a straightforward method called Selective Contextual Reasoning (SCR) for knowledge updating.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-07T08:04:25Z)
• Constraining Sequential Model Editing with Editing Anchor Compression [40.93064933191375]
  Large language models (LLMs) struggle with hallucinations due to false or outdated knowledge. This paper statistically observes that the parameter matrix after editing exhibits a significant deviation compared to its previous state as the number of edits increases. A framework termed Editing Anchor Compression (EAC) is proposed to constrain the deviation of the parameter matrix during sequential editing.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-25T03:56:49Z)
• Reinforced Lifelong Editing for Language Models [12.101856766731574]
  Large language models (LLMs) acquire information from pre-training corpora, but their stored knowledge can become inaccurate or outdated over time. Model editing addresses this challenge by modifying model parameters without retraining, and prevalent approaches leverage hypernetworks to generate these parameter updates. We propose RLEdit, an RL-based editing method that captures changes at the full knowledge sequence level and generates appropriate parameter updates.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-09T03:37:06Z)
• Joint Localization and Activation Editing for Low-Resource Fine-Tuning [73.64004083269424]
  We propose a joint localization and activation editing (JoLA) method. JoLA learns (1) which heads in the Transformer to edit (2) whether the intervention should be additive, multiplicative, or both and (3) the intervention parameters themselves. Through evaluations on three benchmarks spanning commonsense reasoning, natural language understanding, and natural language generation, we demonstrate that JoLA consistently outperforms existing methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-03T09:13:09Z)
• WISE: Rethinking the Knowledge Memory for Lifelong Model Editing of Large Language Models [78.22291694903659]
  Large language models (LLMs) need knowledge updates to meet the ever-growing world facts and correct the hallucinated responses. Where the updated knowledge resides in memories is a fundamental question for model editing. We propose WISE to bridge the gap between memories.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-23T16:35:52Z)
• MemLLM: Finetuning LLMs to Use An Explicit Read-Write Memory [49.96019697955383]
  We introduce MemLLM, a novel method of enhancing knowledge capabilities by integrating a structured and explicit read-and-write memory module. Our experiments indicate that MemLLM enhances performance and interpretability, in language modeling general and in particular. We see MemLLM as an important step towards making LLMs more grounded and factual through memory augmentation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-17T18:13:16Z)
• Learning to Edit: Aligning LLMs with Knowledge Editing [101.96620267293731]
  We propose a Learning to Edit (LTE) framework, focusing on teaching large language models to apply updated knowledge into input questions. LTE features a two-phase process: (i) the Alignment Phase, which fine-tunes LLMs on a meticulously curated parallel dataset to make reliable, in-scope edits. We demonstrate LTE's superiority in knowledge editing performance, robustness in both batch and sequential editing, minimal interference on general tasks, and rapid editing speeds.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-19T07:45:17Z)
• The Butterfly Effect of Model Editing: Few Edits Can Trigger Large Language Models Collapse [58.0132400208411]
  Even a single edit can trigger model collapse, manifesting as significant performance degradation in various benchmark tasks. benchmarking Large Language Models after each edit is impractically time-consuming and resource-intensive. We have utilized GPT-3.5 to develop a new dataset, HardEdit, based on hard cases.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-15T01:50:38Z)
• On the Robustness of Editing Large Language Models [57.477943944826904]
  Large language models (LLMs) have played a pivotal role in building communicative AI, yet they encounter the challenge of efficient updates. This work seeks to understand the strengths and limitations of editing methods, facilitating practical applications of communicative AI.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-08T17:06:45Z)
• Emptying the Ocean with a Spoon: Should We Edit Models? [8.545919917068273]
  We call into question the recently popularized method of direct model editing as a means of correcting factual errors in LLM generations. We contrast model editing with three similar but distinct approaches that pursue better defined objectives.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-18T13:38:03Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.