Quantitative causality, causality-guided scientific discovery, and
causal machine learning
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2402.13427v1
- Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2024 23:38:46 GMT
- Title: Quantitative causality, causality-guided scientific discovery, and
causal machine learning
- Authors: X. San Liang, Dake Chen and Renhe Zhang
- Abstract summary: This note provides a brief review of the decade-long effort to establish a rigorous formalism of causality analysis.
It includes a list of major theoretical results, a sketch of the causal deep learning framework, and some representative real-world applications in geoscience.
- Score: 0.23020018305241333
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: It has been said, arguably, that causality analysis should pave a promising
way to interpretable deep learning and generalization. Incorporation of
causality into artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms, however, is challenged
with its vagueness, non-quantitiveness, computational inefficiency, etc. During
the past 18 years, these challenges have been essentially resolved, with the
establishment of a rigorous formalism of causality analysis initially motivated
from atmospheric predictability. This not only opens a new field in the
atmosphere-ocean science, namely, information flow, but also has led to
scientific discoveries in other disciplines, such as quantum mechanics,
neuroscience, financial economics, etc., through various applications. This
note provides a brief review of the decade-long effort, including a list of
major theoretical results, a sketch of the causal deep learning framework, and
some representative real-world applications in geoscience pertaining to this
journal, such as those on the anthropogenic cause of global warming, the
decadal prediction of El Ni\~no Modoki, the forecasting of an extreme drought
in China, among others.
Related papers
- Causal Representation Learning in Temporal Data via Single-Parent Decoding [66.34294989334728]
Scientific research often seeks to understand the causal structure underlying high-level variables in a system.
Scientists typically collect low-level measurements, such as geographically distributed temperature readings.
We propose a differentiable method, Causal Discovery with Single-parent Decoding, that simultaneously learns the underlying latents and a causal graph over them.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-09T15:57:50Z) - Evaluation of OpenAI o1: Opportunities and Challenges of AGI [112.0812059747033]
o1-preview demonstrated remarkable capabilities, often achieving human-level or superior performance.
The model excelled in tasks requiring intricate reasoning and knowledge integration across various fields.
Overall results indicate significant progress towards artificial general intelligence.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-09-27T06:57:00Z) - From Graphs to Qubits: A Critical Review of Quantum Graph Neural Networks [56.51893966016221]
Quantum Graph Neural Networks (QGNNs) represent a novel fusion of quantum computing and Graph Neural Networks (GNNs)
This paper critically reviews the state-of-the-art in QGNNs, exploring various architectures.
We discuss their applications across diverse fields such as high-energy physics, molecular chemistry, finance and earth sciences, highlighting the potential for quantum advantage.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-08-12T22:53:14Z) - Causality for Earth Science -- A Review on Time-series and Spatiotemporal Causality Methods [2.790669554650619]
The paper presents an overview of causal discovery and causal inference, explains the underlying causal assumptions, and enlists evaluation techniques.
The paper elicits the state-of-the-art methods introduced for time-series andtemporal causal analysis along with their strengths and limitations.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-04-03T14:33:23Z) - Research on Personal Credit Risk Assessment Methods Based on Causal Inference [6.184711584674839]
This paper introduces a new definition of causality using category theory, proposed by Samuel Eilenberg and Saunders Mac Lane in 1945.
Due to the limitations in the development of category theory-related technical tools, this paper adopts the widely-used probabilistic causal graph tool proposed by Judea Pearl in 1995.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-03-17T13:34:45Z) - Artificial Intelligence for Science in Quantum, Atomistic, and Continuum Systems [268.585904751315]
New area of research known as AI for science (AI4Science)
Areas aim at understanding the physical world from subatomic (wavefunctions and electron density), atomic (molecules, proteins, materials, and interactions), to macro (fluids, climate, and subsurface) scales.
Key common challenge is how to capture physics first principles, especially symmetries, in natural systems by deep learning methods.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-07-17T12:14:14Z) - Discovering Causal Relations and Equations from Data [23.802778299505288]
This paper reviews the concepts, methods, and relevant works on causal and equation discovery in the broad field of Physics.
We provide a taxonomy for observational causal and equation discovery, point out connections, and showcase a complete set of case studies.
Exciting times are ahead with many challenges and opportunities to improve our understanding of complex systems.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-05-21T19:22:50Z) - GFlowNets for AI-Driven Scientific Discovery [74.27219800878304]
We present a new probabilistic machine learning framework called GFlowNets.
GFlowNets can be applied in the modeling, hypotheses generation and experimental design stages of the experimental science loop.
We argue that GFlowNets can become a valuable tool for AI-driven scientific discovery.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-02-01T17:29:43Z) - Robust Causality and False Attribution in Data-Driven Earth Science
Discoveries [0.3503794925747607]
Causal and attribution studies are essential for earth scientific discoveries and informing climate, ecology, and water policies.
Here we show that transfer entropy-based causal graphs can be spurious even when augmented with statistical significance.
We develop a subsample-based ensemble approach for robust causality analysis.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-09-26T10:45:48Z) - A Causal Research Pipeline and Tutorial for Psychologists and Social
Scientists [7.106986689736828]
Causality is a fundamental part of the scientific endeavour to understand the world.
Unfortunately, causality is still taboo in much of psychology and social science.
Motivated by a growing number of recommendations for the importance of adopting causal approaches to research, we reformulate the typical approach to research in psychology to harmonize inevitably causal theories with the rest of the research pipeline.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-06-10T15:11:57Z) - A Data Scientist's Guide to Streamflow Prediction [55.22219308265945]
We focus on the element of hydrologic rainfall--runoff models and their application to forecast floods and predict streamflow.
This guide aims to help interested data scientists gain an understanding of the problem, the hydrologic concepts involved, and the details that come up along the way.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-06-05T08:04:37Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.