Investigating Human Values in Online Communities
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2402.14177v2
- Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2024 20:39:25 GMT
- Title: Investigating Human Values in Online Communities
- Authors: Nadav Borenstein, Arnav Arora, Lucie-Aimée Kaffee, Isabelle Augenstein,
- Abstract summary: This paper proposes a computational application of Schwartz's values framework to Reddit.
We automatically annotate six million posts across 10,000 subreddits with Schwartz values.
Our analysis unveils both previously recorded and novel insights into the values prevalent within various online communities.
- Score: 42.63499582400051
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: Human values play a vital role as an analytical tool in social sciences, enabling the study of diverse dimensions within society as a whole and among individual communities. This paper addresses the limitations of traditional survey-based studies of human values by proposing a computational application of Schwartz's values framework to Reddit, a platform organized into distinct online communities. After ensuring the reliability of automated value extraction tools for Reddit content, we automatically annotate six million posts across 10,000 subreddits with Schwartz values. Our analysis unveils both previously recorded and novel insights into the values prevalent within various online communities. For instance, when examining subreddits with differing opinions on controversial topics, we discover higher universalism values in the Vegan subreddit compared to Carnivores. Additionally, our study of geographically specific subreddits highlights the correlation between traditional values and conservative U.S. states.
Related papers
- Structure and dynamics of growing networks of Reddit threads [0.0]
We study a Reddit community in which people participate to judge or be judged with respect to some behavior.
We model threads of this community as complex networks of user interactions growing in time.
We show that the evolution of Reddit networks differ from other real social networks, despite falling in the same category.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-09-06T07:53:33Z) - ValueScope: Unveiling Implicit Norms and Values via Return Potential Model of Social Interactions [47.85181608392683]
We employ ValueScope to dissect and analyze linguistic and stylistic expressions across 13 Reddit communities.
Our analysis provides a quantitative foundation showing that even closely related communities exhibit remarkably diverse norms.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-07-02T17:51:27Z) - That's All Folks: a KG of Values as Commonsense Social Norms and
Behaviors [0.34265828682659694]
We propose two ontological modules, FOLK and That's All Folks.
FOLK is an ontology for values intended in their broad sense, and That's All Folks is a module for lexical and factual folk value triggers.
The resource is tested via performing automatic detection of values from text with a frame-based approach.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-03-01T16:35:46Z) - Learning to Adapt Domain Shifts of Moral Values via Instance Weighting [74.94940334628632]
Classifying moral values in user-generated text from social media is critical to understanding community cultures.
Moral values and language usage can change across the social movements.
We propose a neural adaptation framework via instance weighting to improve cross-domain classification tasks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-04-15T18:15:41Z) - This Must Be the Place: Predicting Engagement of Online Communities in a
Large-scale Distributed Campaign [70.69387048368849]
We study the behavior of communities with millions of active members.
We develop a hybrid model, combining textual cues, community meta-data, and structural properties.
We demonstrate the applicability of our model through Reddit's r/place a large-scale online experiment.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-01-14T08:23:16Z) - What Makes Online Communities 'Better'? Measuring Values, Consensus, and
Conflict across Thousands of Subreddits [13.585903247791094]
We measure community values through the first large-scale survey of community values, including 2,769 reddit users in 2,151 unique subreddits.
We show that community members disagree about how safe their communities are, that longstanding communities place 30.1% more importance on trustworthiness than newer communities.
These findings have important implications, including suggesting that care must be taken to protect vulnerable community members.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-11-10T18:31:22Z) - Making Online Communities 'Better': A Taxonomy of Community Values on
Reddit [16.95132030488259]
We present the first study that elicits values directly from members across a diverse set of communities.
We develop and validate a comprehensive taxonomy of community values, consisting of 29 subcategories within nine top-level categories.
Using our taxonomy, we reframe existing research problems, such as managing influxes of new members, as tensions between different values.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-09-11T01:49:08Z) - Applications of Differential Privacy in Social Network Analysis: A
Survey [60.696428840516724]
Differential privacy is effective in sharing information and preserving privacy with a strong guarantee.
Social network analysis has been extensively adopted in many applications, opening a new arena for the application of differential privacy.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-10-06T19:06:03Z) - Echo Chambers on Social Media: A comparative analysis [64.2256216637683]
We introduce an operational definition of echo chambers and perform a massive comparative analysis on 1B pieces of contents produced by 1M users on four social media platforms.
We infer the leaning of users about controversial topics and reconstruct their interaction networks by analyzing different features.
We find support for the hypothesis that platforms implementing news feed algorithms like Facebook may elicit the emergence of echo-chambers.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-04-20T20:00:27Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.