Filter Bubble or Homogenization? Disentangling the Long-Term Effects of Recommendations on User Consumption Patterns

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2402.15013v2
• Date: Thu, 7 Mar 2024 22:46:33 GMT
• Title: Filter Bubble or Homogenization? Disentangling the Long-Term Effects of Recommendations on User Consumption Patterns
• Authors: Md Sanzeed Anwar, Grant Schoenebeck, Paramveer S. Dhillon
• Abstract summary: We develop a more refined definition of homogenization and the filter bubble effect by decomposing them into two key metrics. We then use a novel agent-based simulation framework that enables a holistic view of the impact of recommendation systems on homogenization and filter bubble effects. We introduce two new recommendation algorithms that take a more nuanced approach by accounting for both types of diversity.
• Score: 4.197682068104959
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Recommendation algorithms play a pivotal role in shaping our media choices, which makes it crucial to comprehend their long-term impact on user behavior. These algorithms are often linked to two critical outcomes: homogenization, wherein users consume similar content despite disparate underlying preferences, and the filter bubble effect, wherein individuals with differing preferences only consume content aligned with their preferences (without much overlap with other users). Prior research assumes a trade-off between homogenization and filter bubble effects and then shows that personalized recommendations mitigate filter bubbles by fostering homogenization. However, because of this assumption of a tradeoff between these two effects, prior work cannot develop a more nuanced view of how recommendation systems may independently impact homogenization and filter bubble effects. We develop a more refined definition of homogenization and the filter bubble effect by decomposing them into two key metrics: how different the average consumption is between users (inter-user diversity) and how varied an individual's consumption is (intra-user diversity). We then use a novel agent-based simulation framework that enables a holistic view of the impact of recommendation systems on homogenization and filter bubble effects. Our simulations show that traditional recommendation algorithms (based on past behavior) mainly reduce filter bubbles by affecting inter-user diversity without significantly impacting intra-user diversity. Building on these findings, we introduce two new recommendation algorithms that take a more nuanced approach by accounting for both types of diversity.

Related papers

• Be Aware of the Neighborhood Effect: Modeling Selection Bias under Interference [50.95521705711802]
  Previous studies have focused on addressing selection bias to achieve unbiased learning of the prediction model. This paper formally formulates the neighborhood effect as an interference problem from the perspective of causal inference. We propose a novel ideal loss that can be used to deal with selection bias in the presence of neighborhood effect.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-30T15:20:41Z)
• The Impact of Recommendation Systems on Opinion Dynamics: Microscopic versus Macroscopic Effects [1.4180331276028664]
  We study the impact of recommendation systems on users, both from a microscopic (i.e., at the level of individual users) and a macroscopic perspective. Our analysis reveals that shifts in the opinions of individual users do not always align with shifts in the opinion distribution of the population.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-16T11:44:51Z)
• BHEISR: Nudging from Bias to Balance -- Promoting Belief Harmony by Eliminating Ideological Segregation in Knowledge-based Recommendations [5.795636579831129]
  The main objective is to strike a belief balance for users while minimizing the detrimental influence caused by filter bubbles. The BHEISR model amalgamates principles from nudge theory while upholding democratic and transparent principles.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-06T06:12:37Z)
• Preference or Intent? Double Disentangled Collaborative Filtering [34.63377358888368]
  In traditional collaborative filtering approaches, both intent and preference factors are usually entangled in the modeling process. We propose a two-fold representation learning approach, namely Double Disentangled Collaborative Filtering (DDCF), for personalized recommendations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-18T16:13:41Z)
• Fairness-aware Differentially Private Collaborative Filtering [22.815168994407358]
  We propose textbfDP-Fair, a two-stage framework for collaborative filtering based algorithms. Specifically, it combines differential privacy mechanisms with fairness constraints to protect user privacy while ensuring fair recommendations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-16T17:44:39Z)
• Picking on the Same Person: Does Algorithmic Monoculture lead to Outcome Homogenization? [90.35044668396591]
  A recurring theme in machine learning is algorithmic monoculture: the same systems, or systems that share components, are deployed by multiple decision-makers. We propose the component-sharing hypothesis: if decision-makers share components like training data or specific models, then they will produce more homogeneous outcomes. We test this hypothesis on algorithmic fairness benchmarks, demonstrating that sharing training data reliably exacerbates homogenization. We conclude with philosophical analyses of and societal challenges for outcome homogenization, with an eye towards implications for deployed machine learning systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-25T09:33:11Z)
• Fair Effect Attribution in Parallel Online Experiments [57.13281584606437]
  A/B tests serve the purpose of reliably identifying the effect of changes introduced in online services. It is common for online platforms to run a large number of simultaneous experiments by splitting incoming user traffic randomly. Despite a perfect randomization between different groups, simultaneous experiments can interact with each other and create a negative impact on average population outcomes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-15T17:15:51Z)
• Mitigating Filter Bubbles within Deep Recommender Systems [2.3590112541068575]
  recommender systems have been known to intellectually isolate users from a variety of perspectives, or cause filter bubbles. We characterize and mitigate this filter bubble effect by classifying various datapoints based on their user-item interaction history. We mitigate this filter bubble effect without compromising accuracy by carefully retraining our recommender system.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-09-16T22:00:10Z)
• Deep Causal Reasoning for Recommendations [47.83224399498504]
  A new trend in recommender system research is to negate the influence of confounders from a causal perspective. We model the recommendation as a multi-cause multi-outcome (MCMO) inference problem. We show that MCMO modeling may lead to high variance due to scarce observations associated with the high-dimensional causal space.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-01-06T15:00:01Z)
• Reenvisioning Collaborative Filtering vs Matrix Factorization [65.74881520196762]
  Collaborative filtering models based on matrix factorization and learned similarities using Artificial Neural Networks (ANNs) have gained significant attention in recent years. Announcement of ANNs within the recommendation ecosystem has been recently questioned, raising several comparisons in terms of efficiency and effectiveness. We show the potential these techniques may have on beyond-accuracy evaluation while analyzing effect on complementary evaluation dimensions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-07-28T16:29:38Z)
• Probabilistic and Variational Recommendation Denoising [56.879165033014026]
  Learning from implicit feedback is one of the most common cases in the application of recommender systems. We propose probabilistic and variational recommendation denoising for implicit feedback. We employ the proposed DPI and DVAE on four state-of-the-art recommendation models and conduct experiments on three datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-20T08:59:44Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.