Decoding Intelligence: A Framework for Certifying Knowledge Comprehension in LLMs

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2402.15929v2
• Date: Mon, 07 Oct 2024 15:01:48 GMT
• Title: Decoding Intelligence: A Framework for Certifying Knowledge Comprehension in LLMs
• Authors: Isha Chaudhary, Vedaant V. Jain, Gagandeep Singh,
• Abstract summary: We propose the first framework to certify knowledge comprehension in Large Language Models with formal probabilistic guarantees. We design and certify novel specifications that precisely represent distributions of knowledge comprehension prompts leveraging knowledge graphs. We find that the knowledge comprehension capability improves significantly with scaling the size of the models.
• Score: 3.6293956720749425
• License:
• Abstract: Knowledge comprehension capability is an important aspect of human intelligence. As Large Language Models (LLMs) are being envisioned as superhuman agents, it is crucial for them to be proficient at knowledge comprehension. However, existing benchmarking studies do not provide consistent, generalizable, and formal guarantees on the knowledge comprehension capabilities of LLMs. In this work, we propose the first framework to certify knowledge comprehension in LLMs with formal probabilistic guarantees. Our certificates are quantitative -- they consist of high-confidence, tight bounds on the probability that a target LLM gives the correct answer on any knowledge comprehension prompt sampled from a distribution. We design and certify novel specifications that precisely represent distributions of knowledge comprehension prompts leveraging knowledge graphs. We certify SOTA LLMs for specifications over the Wikidata5m knowledge graph. We find that the knowledge comprehension capability improves significantly with scaling the size of the models.

Related papers

• Large Language Models are Limited in Out-of-Context Knowledge Reasoning [65.72847298578071]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) possess extensive knowledge and strong capabilities in performing in-context reasoning. This paper focuses on a significant aspect of out-of-context reasoning: Out-of-Context Knowledge Reasoning (OCKR), which is to combine multiple knowledge to infer new knowledge.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-11T15:58:59Z)
• What's in an embedding? Would a rose by any embedding smell as sweet? [0.0]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) are often criticized for lacking true "understanding" and the ability to "reason" with their knowledge. We suggest that LLMs do develop a kind of empirical "understanding" that is "geometry"-like, which seems adequate for a range of applications in NLP. To overcome these limitations, we suggest that LLMs should be integrated with an "algebraic" representation of knowledge that includes symbolic AI elements.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-11T01:10:40Z)
• Prompting Large Language Models with Knowledge Graphs for Question Answering Involving Long-tail Facts [50.06633829833144]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) are effective in performing various NLP tasks, but struggle to handle tasks that require extensive, real-world knowledge. We propose a benchmark that requires knowledge of long-tail facts for answering the involved questions. Our experiments show that LLMs alone struggle with answering these questions, especially when the long-tail level is high or rich knowledge is required.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-10T15:10:20Z)
• FAC$^2$E: Better Understanding Large Language Model Capabilities by Dissociating Language and Cognition [56.76951887823882]
  Large language models (LLMs) are primarily evaluated by overall performance on various text understanding and generation tasks. We present FAC$2$E, a framework for Fine-grAined and Cognition-grounded LLMs' Capability Evaluation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-29T21:05:37Z)
• Can Language Models Act as Knowledge Bases at Scale? [24.99538360485476]
  Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable proficiency in understanding and generating responses to complex queries. Our research investigates whether LLMs can effectively store, recall, and reason with knowledge on a large scale comparable to latest knowledge bases (KBs) such as Wikidata.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-22T04:20:14Z)
• KGQuiz: Evaluating the Generalization of Encoded Knowledge in Large Language Models [39.554274096542244]
  KGQuiz is a knowledge-intensive benchmark to investigate the knowledge generalization abilities of large language models. We evaluate 10 open-source and black-box LLMs on the KGQuiz benchmark across the five knowledge-intensive tasks and knowledge domains. We envision KGQuiz as a testbed to analyze such nuanced variations in performance across domains and task formats.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-15T04:00:36Z)
• KoLA: Carefully Benchmarking World Knowledge of Large Language Models [87.96683299084788]
  We construct a Knowledge-oriented LLM Assessment benchmark (KoLA) We mimic human cognition to form a four-level taxonomy of knowledge-related abilities, covering $19$ tasks. We use both Wikipedia, a corpus prevalently pre-trained by LLMs, along with continuously collected emerging corpora, to evaluate the capacity to handle unseen data and evolving knowledge.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-15T17:20:46Z)
• Do Large Language Models Know What They Don't Know? [74.65014158544011]
  Large language models (LLMs) have a wealth of knowledge that allows them to excel in various Natural Language Processing (NLP) tasks. Despite their vast knowledge, LLMs are still limited by the amount of information they can accommodate and comprehend. This study aims to evaluate LLMs' self-knowledge by assessing their ability to identify unanswerable or unknowable questions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-29T15:30:13Z)
• Knowledge Rumination for Pre-trained Language Models [77.55888291165462]
  We propose a new paradigm dubbed Knowledge Rumination to help the pre-trained language model utilize related latent knowledge without retrieving it from the external corpus. We apply the proposed knowledge rumination to various language models, including RoBERTa, DeBERTa, and GPT-3.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-15T15:47:09Z)
• KMIR: A Benchmark for Evaluating Knowledge Memorization, Identification and Reasoning Abilities of Language Models [28.82149012250609]
  We propose a benchmark, named Knowledge Memorization, Identification, and Reasoning test (KMIR) KMIR covers 3 types of knowledge, including general knowledge, domain-specific knowledge, and commonsense, and provides 184,348 well-designed questions. Preliminary experiments with various representative pre-training language models on KMIR reveal many interesting phenomenons.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-02-28T03:52:57Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.