Re-Ex: Revising after Explanation Reduces the Factual Errors in LLM Responses
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2402.17097v2
- Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2024 11:37:44 GMT
- Title: Re-Ex: Revising after Explanation Reduces the Factual Errors in LLM Responses
- Authors: Juyeon Kim, Jeongeun Lee, Yoonho Chang, Chanyeol Choi, Junseong Kim, Jy-yong Sohn,
- Abstract summary: We propose Re-Ex, a method for post-editing large language models (LLMs)-generated responses.
Re-Ex introduces a novel reasoning step dubbed as the factual error explanation step.
In addition to the explanation step, Re-Ex also incorporates new prompting techniques to reduce the token count and inference time required for the response revision process.
- Score: 9.956253757863145
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: Mitigating hallucination issues is a key challenge that must be overcome to reliably deploy large language models (LLMs) in real-world scenarios. Recently, various methods have been proposed to detect and revise factual errors in LLM-generated texts, in order to reduce hallucination. In this paper, we propose Re-Ex, a method for post-editing LLM-generated responses. Re-Ex introduces a novel reasoning step dubbed as the factual error explanation step. Re-Ex revises the initial response of LLMs using 3-steps : first, external tools are used to retrieve the evidences of the factual errors in the initial LLM response; next, LLM is instructed to explain the problematic parts of the response based on the gathered evidence; finally, LLM revises the initial response using the explanations provided in the previous step. In addition to the explanation step, Re-Ex also incorporates new prompting techniques to reduce the token count and inference time required for the response revision process. Compared with existing methods including FacTool, CoVE, and RARR, Re-Ex provides better detection and revision performance with less inference time and fewer tokens in multiple benchmarks.
Related papers
- Guiding Retrieval using LLM-based Listwise Rankers [15.3583908068962]
We propose an adaptation of an existing adaptive retrieval method that supports the listwise setting.
Specifically, our proposed algorithm merges results both from the initial ranking and feedback documents.
We demonstrate that our method can improve nDCG@10 by up to 13.23% and recall by 28.02%--all while keeping the total number of LLM inferences constant and overheads due to the adaptive process minimal.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-01-15T22:23:53Z) - Real-time Verification and Refinement of Language Model Text Generation [60.04718679054704]
Large language models (LLMs) have shown remarkable performance across a wide range of natural language tasks.
A critical challenge remains in that they sometimes generate factually incorrect answers.
We propose Streaming-VR, a novel approach designed to enhance the efficiency of verification and refinement of LLM outputs.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-01-14T03:59:48Z) - R-Bot: An LLM-based Query Rewrite System [15.46599915198438]
We propose R-Bot, a query rewrite system based on machine learning.
We first design a multi-source rewrite evidence preparation pipeline to generate query rewrite evidences.
We then propose a hybrid-semantics retrieval method that combines structural and semantic analysis.
We conduct comprehensive experiments on widely used benchmarks, and demonstrate the superior performance of our system.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-12-02T16:13:04Z) - LLMRefine: Pinpointing and Refining Large Language Models via Fine-Grained Actionable Feedback [65.84061725174269]
Recent large language models (LLM) are leveraging human feedback to improve their generation quality.
We propose LLMRefine, an inference time optimization method to refine LLM's output.
We conduct experiments on three text generation tasks, including machine translation, long-form question answering (QA), and topical summarization.
LLMRefine consistently outperforms all baseline approaches, achieving improvements up to 1.7 MetricX points on translation tasks, 8.1 ROUGE-L on ASQA, 2.2 ROUGE-L on topical summarization.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-11-15T19:52:11Z) - LLatrieval: LLM-Verified Retrieval for Verifiable Generation [67.93134176912477]
Verifiable generation aims to let the large language model (LLM) generate text with supporting documents.
We propose LLatrieval (Large Language Model Verified Retrieval), where the LLM updates the retrieval result until it verifies that the retrieved documents can sufficiently support answering the question.
Experiments show that LLatrieval significantly outperforms extensive baselines and achieves state-of-the-art results.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-11-14T01:38:02Z) - Revisiting Large Language Models as Zero-shot Relation Extractors [8.953462875381888]
Relation extraction (RE) consistently involves a certain degree of labeled or unlabeled data even if under zero-shot setting.
Recent studies have shown that large language models (LLMs) transfer well to new tasks out-of-the-box simply given a natural language prompt.
This work focuses on the study of exploring LLMs as zero-shot relation extractors.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-08T06:17:39Z) - Query Rewriting for Retrieval-Augmented Large Language Models [139.242907155883]
Large Language Models (LLMs) play powerful, black-box readers in the retrieve-then-read pipeline.
This work introduces a new framework, Rewrite-Retrieve-Read instead of the previous retrieve-then-read for the retrieval-augmented LLMs.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-05-23T17:27:50Z) - RCOT: Detecting and Rectifying Factual Inconsistency in Reasoning by
Reversing Chain-of-Thought [56.558892336235914]
Reversing Chain-of-Thought (RCoT) is a novel method to improve large language models' reasoning abilities.
RCoT automatically detects and rectifys factual inconsistency in generated solutions.
We show that manually written fine-grained feedback can dramatically improve LLMs' reasoning abilities.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-05-19T08:02:52Z) - Check Your Facts and Try Again: Improving Large Language Models with
External Knowledge and Automated Feedback [127.75419038610455]
Large language models (LLMs) are able to generate human-like, fluent responses for many downstream tasks.
This paper proposes a LLM-Augmenter system, which augments a black-box LLM with a set of plug-and-play modules.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-02-24T18:48:43Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.