Spurious Feature Eraser: Stabilizing Test-Time Adaptation for Vision-Language Foundation Model

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2403.00376v2
• Date: Mon, 3 Jun 2024 07:09:39 GMT
• Title: Spurious Feature Eraser: Stabilizing Test-Time Adaptation for Vision-Language Foundation Model
• Authors: Huan Ma, Yan Zhu, Changqing Zhang, Peilin Zhao, Baoyuan Wu, Long-Kai Huang, Qinghua Hu, Bingzhe Wu,
• Abstract summary: Vision-language foundation models have exhibited remarkable success across a multitude of downstream tasks due to their scalability on extensive image-text paired data. However, these models display significant limitations when applied to downstream tasks, such as fine-grained image classification, as a result of decision shortcuts''
• Score: 86.9619638550683
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Vision-language foundation models have exhibited remarkable success across a multitude of downstream tasks due to their scalability on extensive image-text paired data. However, these models also display significant limitations when applied to downstream tasks, such as fine-grained image classification, as a result of ``decision shortcuts'' that hinder their generalization capabilities. In this work, we find that the CLIP model possesses a rich set of features, encompassing both \textit{desired invariant causal features} and \textit{undesired decision shortcuts}. Moreover, the underperformance of CLIP on downstream tasks originates from its inability to effectively utilize pre-trained features in accordance with specific task requirements. To address this challenge, we propose a simple yet effective method, Spurious Feature Eraser (SEraser), to alleviate the decision shortcuts by erasing the spurious features. Specifically, we introduce a test-time prompt tuning paradigm that optimizes a learnable prompt, thereby compelling the model to exploit invariant features while disregarding decision shortcuts during the inference phase. The proposed method effectively alleviates excessive dependence on potentially misleading spurious information. We conduct comparative analysis of the proposed method against various approaches which validates the significant superiority.

Related papers

• Learning-to-Defer for Extractive Question Answering [0.0]
  We introduce an adapted two-stage Learning-to-Defer mechanism that enhances decision-making by enabling selective deference to human experts or larger models without retraining language models in the context of question-answering. Our results demonstrate that deferring a minimal number of queries allows the smaller model to achieve performance comparable to their larger counterparts while preserving computing efficiency.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-21T08:21:00Z)
• Hard Prompts Made Interpretable: Sparse Entropy Regularization for Prompt Tuning with RL [29.01858866450715]
  We present RLPrompt, which aims to find optimal prompt tokens leveraging soft Q-learning. While the results show promise, we have observed that the prompts frequently appear unnatural, which impedes their interpretability. We address this limitation by using sparse Tsallis entropy regularization, a principled approach to filtering out unlikely tokens from consideration.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-20T03:10:19Z)
• Tuning-Free Accountable Intervention for LLM Deployment -- A Metacognitive Approach [55.613461060997004]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have catalyzed transformative advances across a spectrum of natural language processing tasks. We propose an innovative textitmetacognitive approach, dubbed textbfCLEAR, to equip LLMs with capabilities for self-aware error identification and correction.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-08T19:18:53Z)
• Debiasing Multimodal Large Language Models [61.6896704217147]
  Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs) have become indispensable tools in computer vision and natural language processing. Our investigation reveals a noteworthy bias in the generated content, where the output is primarily influenced by the underlying Large Language Models (LLMs) prior to the input image. To rectify these biases and redirect the model's focus toward vision information, we introduce two simple, training-free strategies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-08T12:35:07Z)
• Causal Feature Selection via Transfer Entropy [59.999594949050596]
  Causal discovery aims to identify causal relationships between features with observational data. We introduce a new causal feature selection approach that relies on the forward and backward feature selection procedures. We provide theoretical guarantees on the regression and classification errors for both the exact and the finite-sample cases.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-17T08:04:45Z)
• Self-regulating Prompts: Foundational Model Adaptation without Forgetting [112.66832145320434]
  We introduce a self-regularization framework for prompting called PromptSRC. PromptSRC guides the prompts to optimize for both task-specific and task-agnostic general representations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-13T17:59:35Z)
• Fine-grained Retrieval Prompt Tuning [149.9071858259279]
  Fine-grained Retrieval Prompt Tuning steers a frozen pre-trained model to perform the fine-grained retrieval task from the perspectives of sample prompt and feature adaptation. Our FRPT with fewer learnable parameters achieves the state-of-the-art performance on three widely-used fine-grained datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-07-29T04:10:04Z)
• Understanding Failures of Deep Networks via Robust Feature Extraction [44.204907883776045]
  We introduce and study a method aimed at characterizing and explaining failures by identifying visual attributes whose presence or absence results in poor performance. We leverage the representation of a separate robust model to extract interpretable features and then harness these features to identify failure modes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-12-03T08:33:29Z)
• Feature Selection for Huge Data via Minipatch Learning [0.0]
  We propose Stable Minipatch Selection (STAMPS) and Adaptive STAMPS. STAMPS are meta-algorithms that build ensembles of selection events of base feature selectors trained on tiny, (ly-adaptive) random subsets of both the observations and features of the data. Our approaches are general and can be employed with a variety of existing feature selection strategies and machine learning techniques.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-16T17:41:08Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.