Does Documentation Matter? An Empirical Study of Practitioners'
Perspective on Open-Source Software Adoption
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2403.03819v1
- Date: Wed, 6 Mar 2024 16:06:08 GMT
- Title: Does Documentation Matter? An Empirical Study of Practitioners'
Perspective on Open-Source Software Adoption
- Authors: Aaron Imani, Shiva Radmanesh, Iftekhar Ahmed, Mohammad Moshirpour
- Abstract summary: Open-source software (OSS) has become increasingly prevalent in developing software products.
We conducted semi-structured interviews and an online survey to provide insight into this area.
We developed a topic model to collect relevant information from OSS documentation automatically.
We propose a novel information augmentation approach, DocMentor, by combining OSS documentation corpus-IDF scores and ChatGPT.
- Score: 4.400274233826898
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: In recent years, open-source software (OSS) has become increasingly prevalent
in developing software products. While OSS documentation is the primary source
of information provided by the developers' community about a product, its role
in the industry's adoption process has yet to be examined. We conducted
semi-structured interviews and an online survey to provide insight into this
area. Based on interviews and survey insights, we developed a topic model to
collect relevant information from OSS documentation automatically.
Additionally, according to our survey responses regarding challenges associated
with OSS documentation, we propose a novel information augmentation approach,
DocMentor, by combining OSS documentation corpus TF-IDF scores and ChatGPT.
Through explaining technical terms and providing examples and references, our
approach enhances the documentation context and improves practitioners'
understanding. Our tool's effectiveness is assessed by surveying practitioners.
Related papers
- Deep Learning based Key Information Extraction from Business Documents: Systematic Literature Review [51.61531917413708]
Deep learning-based approaches for Key Information Extraction have been proposed under the umbrella term Document Understanding.
The goal of this systematic literature review is an in-depth analysis of existing approaches in this domain and the identification of opportunities for further research.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-07-23T08:15:55Z) - SyROCCo: Enhancing Systematic Reviews using Machine Learning [6.805429133535976]
This paper explores the use of machine learning techniques to help navigate the systematic review process.
The application of ML techniques to subsequent stages of a review, such as data extraction and evidence mapping, is in its infancy.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-24T11:04:43Z) - Systematic Mapping Protocol -- UX Design role in software development
process [55.2480439325792]
We present a systematic mapping protocol for investigating the role of the UX designer in the software development process.
We define the research questions, scope, sources, search strategy, selection criteria, data extraction, and analysis methods that we will use to conduct the mapping study.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-20T16:56:46Z) - Understanding Documentation Use Through Log Analysis: An Exploratory
Case Study of Four Cloud Services [14.104545948572836]
We analyze documentation page-view logs from four cloud-based industrial services.
By analyzing page-view logs for over 100,000 users, we find diverse patterns of documentation page visits.
We propose documentation page-view log analysis as a feasible technique for design audits of documentation.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-16T20:37:29Z) - Enhancing API Documentation through BERTopic Modeling and Summarization [0.0]
This paper focuses on the complexities of interpreting Application Programming Interface (API) documentation.
Official API documentation serves as a primary source of information for developers, but it can often be extensive and lacks user-friendliness.
Our novel approach employs the strengths of BERTopic for topic modeling and Natural Language Processing (NLP) to automatically generate summaries of API documentation.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-08-17T15:57:12Z) - Layout-Aware Information Extraction for Document-Grounded Dialogue:
Dataset, Method and Demonstration [75.47708732473586]
We propose a layout-aware document-level Information Extraction dataset, LIE, to facilitate the study of extracting both structural and semantic knowledge from visually rich documents.
LIE contains 62k annotations of three extraction tasks from 4,061 pages in product and official documents.
Empirical results show that layout is critical for VRD-based extraction, and system demonstration also verifies that the extracted knowledge can help locate the answers that users care about.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-07-14T07:59:45Z) - Embedding Knowledge for Document Summarization: A Survey [66.76415502727802]
Previous works proved that knowledge-embedded document summarizers excel at generating superior digests.
We propose novel to recapitulate knowledge and knowledge embeddings under the document summarization view.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-04-24T04:36:07Z) - Unified Pretraining Framework for Document Understanding [52.224359498792836]
We present UDoc, a new unified pretraining framework for document understanding.
UDoc is designed to support most document understanding tasks, extending the Transformer to take multimodal embeddings as input.
An important feature of UDoc is that it learns a generic representation by making use of three self-supervised losses.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-04-22T21:47:04Z) - Document AI: Benchmarks, Models and Applications [35.46858492311289]
Document AI refers to the techniques for automatically reading, understanding, and analyzing business documents.
In recent years, the popularity of deep learning technology has greatly advanced the development of Document AI.
This paper briefly reviews some of the representative models, tasks, and benchmark datasets.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-11-16T16:43:07Z) - A Survey of Deep Learning Approaches for OCR and Document Understanding [68.65995739708525]
We review different techniques for document understanding for documents written in English.
We consolidate methodologies present in literature to act as a jumping-off point for researchers exploring this area.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-11-27T03:05:59Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.