Preference optimization of protein language models as a multi-objective binder design paradigm

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2403.04187v1
• Date: Thu, 7 Mar 2024 03:36:03 GMT
• Title: Preference optimization of protein language models as a multi-objective binder design paradigm
• Authors: Pouria Mistani, Venkatesh Mysore
• Abstract summary: We present a multi-objective binder design paradigm based on instruction fine-tuning and direct preference optimization. We show the proposed alignment strategy enables ProtGPT2 to effectively design binders conditioned on specified receptors and a drug developability criterion.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
• Abstract: We present a multi-objective binder design paradigm based on instruction fine-tuning and direct preference optimization (DPO) of autoregressive protein language models (pLMs). Multiple design objectives are encoded in the language model through direct optimization on expert curated preference sequence datasets comprising preferred and dispreferred distributions. We show the proposed alignment strategy enables ProtGPT2 to effectively design binders conditioned on specified receptors and a drug developability criterion. Generated binder samples demonstrate median isoelectric point (pI) improvements by $17\%-60\%$.

Related papers

• Self-Improvement Towards Pareto Optimality: Mitigating Preference Conflicts in Multi-Objective Alignment [74.25832963097658]
  Multi-Objective Alignment (MOA) aims to align responses with multiple human preference objectives. We find that DPO-based MOA approaches suffer from widespread preference conflicts in the data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-20T08:27:00Z)
• Refining Alignment Framework for Diffusion Models with Intermediate-Step Preference Ranking [50.325021634589596]
  We propose a Tailored Optimization Preference (TailorPO) framework for aligning diffusion models with human preference. Our approach directly ranks intermediate noisy samples based on their step-wise reward, and effectively resolves the gradient direction issues. Experimental results demonstrate that our method significantly improves the model's ability to generate aesthetically pleasing and human-preferred images.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-01T16:08:43Z)
• Reward-aware Preference Optimization: A Unified Mathematical Framework for Model Alignment [45.45508377432791]
  This paper introduces Reward-Aware Preference Optimization (RPO), a mathematical framework that unifies popular preference optimization techniques. RPO provides a structured approach to disentangle and systematically study the impact of various design choices. We propose a new experimental setup that enables the clean and direct ablation of such design choices.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-31T22:39:04Z)
• Diversity By Design: Leveraging Distribution Matching for Offline Model-Based Optimization [29.303300250713804]
  We propose Diversity in Adrial Model-based Optimization (DynAMO) as a novel method to introduce design diversity as an explicit objective into any MBO problem. Our key insight is to formulate diversity as a distribution matching problem where the distribution of generated designs captures the inherent diversity contained within the offline dataset.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-30T21:43:25Z)
• Evolutionary Pre-Prompt Optimization for Mathematical Reasoning [45.461506988071534]
  This paper explores the optimization of example selection for designing effective chain-of-thought pre-prompts. It shows that the choice of the algorithm, typically in favor of comparison-based methods such as evolutionary computation, significantly enhances efficacy and feasibility.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-05T16:12:06Z)
• Towards Improved Preference Optimization Pipeline: from Data Generation to Budget-Controlled Regularization [14.50339880957898]
  We aim to improve the preference optimization pipeline by taking a closer look at preference data generation and training regularization techniques. For preference data generation, we propose an iterative pairwise ranking mechanism that derives preference ranking of completions using pairwise comparison signals. For training regularization, we observe that preference optimization tends to achieve better convergence when the LLM predicted likelihood of preferred samples gets slightly reduced.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-07T23:03:11Z)
• Preference Optimization with Multi-Sample Comparisons [53.02717574375549]
  We introduce a novel approach that extends post-training to include multi-sample comparisons. These approaches fail to capture critical characteristics such as generative diversity and bias. We demonstrate that multi-sample comparison is more effective in optimizing collective characteristics than single-sample comparison.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-16T00:59:19Z)
• Preference Alignment Improves Language Model-Based TTS [76.70693823683091]
  preference alignment algorithms adjust LMs to align with the preferences of reward models, enhancing the desirability of the generated content. With a 1.15B parameter LM-based TTS model, we demonstrate that preference alignment consistently improves intelligibility, speaker similarity, and proxy subjective evaluation scores.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-19T01:58:19Z)
• Hybrid Preference Optimization: Augmenting Direct Preference Optimization with Auxiliary Objectives [0.5120567378386615]
  We propose a hybrid approach to aligning large language models (LLMs) With a simple augmentation to the implicit reward decomposition of DPO, we allow for tuning LLMs to maximize a set of arbitrary auxiliary rewards. The proposed method, Hybrid Preference Optimization (HPO), shows the ability to effectively generalize to both user preferences and auxiliary designer objectives.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-28T08:35:48Z)
• Diffusion Model for Data-Driven Black-Box Optimization [54.25693582870226]
  We focus on diffusion models, a powerful generative AI technology, and investigate their potential for black-box optimization. We study two practical types of labels: 1) noisy measurements of a real-valued reward function and 2) human preference based on pairwise comparisons. Our proposed method reformulates the design optimization problem into a conditional sampling problem, which allows us to leverage the power of diffusion models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-20T00:41:12Z)
• Functional Graphical Models: Structure Enables Offline Data-Driven Optimization [111.28605744661638]
  We show how structure can enable sample-efficient data-driven optimization. We also present a data-driven optimization algorithm that infers the FGM structure itself.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-08T22:33:14Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.