A Data-Driven Two-Phase Multi-Split Causal Ensemble Model for Time Series

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2403.04793v1
• Date: Mon, 4 Mar 2024 14:20:41 GMT
• Title: A Data-Driven Two-Phase Multi-Split Causal Ensemble Model for Time Series
• Authors: Zhipeng Ma, Marco Kemmerling, Daniel Buschmann, Chrismarie Enslin, Daniel L\"utticke, Robert H. Schmitt
• Abstract summary: Causal inference is a fundamental research topic for discovering the cause-effect relationships in many disciplines. Some approaches may only be able to identify linear relationships, while others are applicable for non-linearities. This publication proposes a novel data-driven multi-split causal ensemble model to combine the strengths of different causality base algorithms.
• Score: 0.8252665500568257
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
• Abstract: Causal inference is a fundamental research topic for discovering the cause-effect relationships in many disciplines. However, not all algorithms are equally well-suited for a given dataset. For instance, some approaches may only be able to identify linear relationships, while others are applicable for non-linearities. Algorithms further vary in their sensitivity to noise and their ability to infer causal information from coupled vs. non-coupled time series. Therefore, different algorithms often generate different causal relationships for the same input. To achieve a more robust causal inference result, this publication proposes a novel data-driven two-phase multi-split causal ensemble model to combine the strengths of different causality base algorithms. In comparison to existing approaches, the proposed ensemble method reduces the influence of noise through a data partitioning scheme in the first phase. To achieve this, the data are initially divided into several partitions and the base algorithms are applied to each partition. Subsequently, Gaussian mixture models are used to identify the causal relationships derived from the different partitions that are likely to be valid. In the second phase, the identified relationships from each base algorithm are then merged based on three combination rules. The proposed ensemble approach is evaluated using multiple metrics, among them a newly developed evaluation index for causal ensemble approaches. We perform experiments using three synthetic datasets with different volumes and complexity, which are specifically designed to test causality detection methods under different circumstances while knowing the ground truth causal relationships. In these experiments, our causality ensemble outperforms each of its base algorithms. In practical applications, the use of the proposed method could hence lead to more robust and reliable causality results.

Related papers

• Causal discovery for time series with constraint-based model and PMIME measure [0.0]
  We present a novel approach for discovering causality in time series data that combines a causal discovery algorithm with an information theoretic-based measure. We evaluate the performance of our approach on several simulated data sets, showing promising results.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-31T09:38:50Z)
• Robust Detection of Lead-Lag Relationships in Lagged Multi-Factor Models [61.10851158749843]
  Key insights can be obtained by discovering lead-lag relationships inherent in the data. We develop a clustering-driven methodology for robust detection of lead-lag relationships in lagged multi-factor models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-11T10:30:35Z)
• A Survey on Causal Discovery Methods for I.I.D. and Time Series Data [4.57769506869942]
  Causal Discovery (CD) algorithms can identify the cause-effect relationships among the variables of a system from related observational data. We present an extensive discussion on the methods designed to perform causal discovery from both independent and identically distributed (I.I.D.) data and time series data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-27T09:21:41Z)
• Learning to Bound Counterfactual Inference in Structural Causal Models from Observational and Randomised Data [64.96984404868411]
  We derive a likelihood characterisation for the overall data that leads us to extend a previous EM-based algorithm. The new algorithm learns to approximate the (unidentifiability) region of model parameters from such mixed data sources. It delivers interval approximations to counterfactual results, which collapse to points in the identifiable case.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-06T12:42:11Z)
• Valid Inference After Causal Discovery [73.87055989355737]
  We develop tools for valid post-causal-discovery inference. We show that a naive combination of causal discovery and subsequent inference algorithms leads to highly inflated miscoverage rates.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-08-11T17:40:45Z)
• Estimation of Bivariate Structural Causal Models by Variational Gaussian Process Regression Under Likelihoods Parametrised by Normalising Flows [74.85071867225533]
  Causal mechanisms can be described by structural causal models. One major drawback of state-of-the-art artificial intelligence is its lack of explainability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-09-06T14:52:58Z)
• Learning Neural Causal Models with Active Interventions [83.44636110899742]
  We introduce an active intervention-targeting mechanism which enables a quick identification of the underlying causal structure of the data-generating process. Our method significantly reduces the required number of interactions compared with random intervention targeting. We demonstrate superior performance on multiple benchmarks from simulated to real-world data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-09-06T13:10:37Z)
• Algorithms for Solving Nonlinear Binary Optimization Problems in Robust Causal Inference [2.169755083801688]
  We propose greedy algorithms to solve the robust causal inference test instances from observational data with continuous outcomes. By leveraging the structure of the feasibility formulation, we develop greedy schemes that are efficient in solving robust test problems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-12-22T16:12:11Z)
• ParKCa: Causal Inference with Partially Known Causes [7.1894784995284144]
  Our proposed method ParKCA combines the results of several causal inference methods to learn new causes in applications with some known causes and many potential causes. Our results show that ParKCA can infer more causes than existing methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-03-17T21:36:56Z)
• A Critical View of the Structural Causal Model [89.43277111586258]
  We show that one can identify the cause and the effect without considering their interaction at all. We propose a new adversarial training method that mimics the disentangled structure of the causal model. Our multidimensional method outperforms the literature methods on both synthetic and real world datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-02-23T22:52:28Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.