ParKCa: Causal Inference with Partially Known Causes
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2003.07952v4
- Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2020 22:13:54 GMT
- Title: ParKCa: Causal Inference with Partially Known Causes
- Authors: Raquel Aoki and Martin Ester
- Abstract summary: Our proposed method ParKCA combines the results of several causal inference methods to learn new causes in applications with some known causes and many potential causes.
Our results show that ParKCA can infer more causes than existing methods.
- Score: 7.1894784995284144
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: Methods for causal inference from observational data are an alternative for
scenarios where collecting counterfactual data or realizing a randomized
experiment is not possible. Adopting a stacking approach, our proposed method
ParKCA combines the results of several causal inference methods to learn new
causes in applications with some known causes and many potential causes. We
validate ParKCA in two Genome-wide association studies, one real-world and one
simulated dataset. Our results show that ParKCA can infer more causes than
existing methods.
Related papers
- A Data-Driven Two-Phase Multi-Split Causal Ensemble Model for Time
Series [0.8252665500568257]
Causal inference is a fundamental research topic for discovering the cause-effect relationships in many disciplines.
Some approaches may only be able to identify linear relationships, while others are applicable for non-linearities.
This publication proposes a novel data-driven multi-split causal ensemble model to combine the strengths of different causality base algorithms.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-03-04T14:20:41Z) - Federated Causal Discovery from Heterogeneous Data [70.31070224690399]
We propose a novel FCD method attempting to accommodate arbitrary causal models and heterogeneous data.
These approaches involve constructing summary statistics as a proxy of the raw data to protect data privacy.
We conduct extensive experiments on synthetic and real datasets to show the efficacy of our method.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-20T18:53:53Z) - Benchmarking Bayesian Causal Discovery Methods for Downstream Treatment
Effect Estimation [137.3520153445413]
A notable gap exists in the evaluation of causal discovery methods, where insufficient emphasis is placed on downstream inference.
We evaluate seven established baseline causal discovery methods including a newly proposed method based on GFlowNets.
The results of our study demonstrate that some of the algorithms studied are able to effectively capture a wide range of useful and diverse ATE modes.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-07-11T02:58:10Z) - Advancing Counterfactual Inference through Nonlinear Quantile Regression [77.28323341329461]
We propose a framework for efficient and effective counterfactual inference implemented with neural networks.
The proposed approach enhances the capacity to generalize estimated counterfactual outcomes to unseen data.
Empirical results conducted on multiple datasets offer compelling support for our theoretical assertions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-06-09T08:30:51Z) - A step towards the applicability of algorithms based on invariant causal
learning on observational data [0.0]
In this paper, we show how to apply Invariant Causal Prediction (ICP) efficiently integrated with causal discovery methods.
We also show how to apply ICP efficiently integrated with our method for causal discovery.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-04-05T08:15:57Z) - From Causal Pairs to Causal Graphs [1.5469452301122175]
Causal structure learning from observational data remains a non-trivial task.
Motivated by the Cause-Effect Pair' NIPS 2013 Workshop on Causality Challenge, we take a different approach and generate a probability distribution over all possible graphs.
The goal of the paper is to propose new methods based on this probabilistic information and compare their performance with traditional and state-of-the-art approaches.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-11-08T15:28:55Z) - Valid Inference After Causal Discovery [73.87055989355737]
We develop tools for valid post-causal-discovery inference.
We show that a naive combination of causal discovery and subsequent inference algorithms leads to highly inflated miscoverage rates.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-08-11T17:40:45Z) - Deep End-to-end Causal Inference [36.822180456180675]
Causal inference is essential for data-driven decision making across domains such as business engagement, medical treatment or policy making.
We develop Deep End-to-end Causal Inference (DECI), a single flow-based method that takes in observational data and can perform both causal discovery and inference.
Our results show the superior performance of DECI when compared to relevant baselines for both causal discovery and (C)ATE estimation.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-02-04T15:40:28Z) - Latent Instrumental Variables as Priors in Causal Inference based on
Independence of Cause and Mechanism [2.28438857884398]
We study the role of latent variables such as latent instrumental variables and hidden common causes in the causal graphical structures.
We derive a novel algorithm to infer causal relationships between two variables.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-07-17T08:18:19Z) - A Critical View of the Structural Causal Model [89.43277111586258]
We show that one can identify the cause and the effect without considering their interaction at all.
We propose a new adversarial training method that mimics the disentangled structure of the causal model.
Our multidimensional method outperforms the literature methods on both synthetic and real world datasets.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-02-23T22:52:28Z) - A Survey on Causal Inference [64.45536158710014]
Causal inference is a critical research topic across many domains, such as statistics, computer science, education, public policy and economics.
Various causal effect estimation methods for observational data have sprung up.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-02-05T21:35:29Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.