Efficiently Quantifying and Mitigating Ripple Effects in Model Editing
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2403.07825v3
- Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2024 03:06:39 GMT
- Title: Efficiently Quantifying and Mitigating Ripple Effects in Model Editing
- Authors: Jianchen Wang, Zhouhong Gu, Xiaoxuan Zhu, Lin Zhang, Haoning Ye, Zhuozhi Xiong, Hongwei Feng, Yanghua Xiao,
- Abstract summary: Large Language Models are crucial for rectifying outdated or erroneous information.
editing these models often leads to a complex issue known as the ripple effect in the hidden space.
This paper proposes a novel evaluation methodology, which quantitatively evaluates the adaptations of the model and the subsequent impact of editing.
Furthermore, we introduce the Selective Impact Revision(SIR), a model editing method designed to mitigate this ripple effect.
- Score: 27.627105709896025
- License:
- Abstract: Large Language Models have revolutionized numerous tasks with their remarkable efficacy. However, editing these models, crucial for rectifying outdated or erroneous information, often leads to a complex issue known as the ripple effect in the hidden space. While difficult to detect, this effect can significantly impede the efficacy of model editing tasks and deteriorate model performance. This paper addresses this scientific challenge by proposing a novel evaluation methodology, Graphical Impact Evaluation(GIE), which quantitatively evaluates the adaptations of the model and the subsequent impact of editing. Furthermore, we introduce the Selective Impact Revision(SIR), a model editing method designed to mitigate this ripple effect. Our comprehensive evaluations reveal that the ripple effect in the hidden space is a significant issue in all current model editing methods. However, our proposed methods, GIE and SIR, effectively identify and alleviate this issue, contributing to the advancement of LLM editing techniques.
Related papers
- Reasons and Solutions for the Decline in Model Performance after Editing [17.756172082400163]
This paper explores the reasons for the performance decline of the edited model and optimize the editing method.
The performance of the editing model is mainly affected by the diversity of editing targets and sequence length.
In order to improve the performance of the editing model, this paper proposes a Dump for Sequence (D4S) method.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-31T11:49:44Z) - Uncovering Overfitting in Large Language Model Editing [35.55260822503773]
We identify and investigate the phenomenon of Editing Overfit, where edited models assign disproportionately high probabilities to the edit target.
We propose a new plug-and-play strategy called Learn to Inference (LTI), which introduce a Multi-stage Inference Constraint module to guide the edited models in recalling new knowledge.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-10T11:09:00Z) - Enhancing Training Data Attribution for Large Language Models with Fitting Error Consideration [74.09687562334682]
We introduce a novel training data attribution method called Debias and Denoise Attribution (DDA)
Our method significantly outperforms existing approaches, achieving an averaged AUC of 91.64%.
DDA exhibits strong generality and scalability across various sources and different-scale models like LLaMA2, QWEN2, and Mistral.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-02T07:14:26Z) - The Butterfly Effect of Model Editing: Few Edits Can Trigger Large Language Models Collapse [58.0132400208411]
Even a single edit can trigger model collapse, manifesting as significant performance degradation in various benchmark tasks.
benchmarking Large Language Models after each edit is impractically time-consuming and resource-intensive.
We have utilized GPT-3.5 to develop a new dataset, HardEdit, based on hard cases.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-15T01:50:38Z) - Model Editing Harms General Abilities of Large Language Models: Regularization to the Rescue [122.20016030723043]
We evaluate the side effects of model editing on large language models (LLMs)
Our analysis reveals that the side effects are caused by model editing altering the original model weights excessively.
To mitigate this, a method named RECT is proposed to regularize the edit update weights.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-01-09T18:03:15Z) - Editing Large Language Models: Problems, Methods, and Opportunities [51.903537096207]
This paper embarks on a deep exploration of the problems, methods, and opportunities related to model editing for LLMs.
We provide an exhaustive overview of the task definition and challenges associated with model editing, along with an in-depth empirical analysis of the most progressive methods currently at our disposal.
Our objective is to provide valuable insights into the effectiveness and feasibility of each editing technique, thereby assisting the community in making informed decisions on the selection of the most appropriate method for a specific task or context.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-05-22T16:00:00Z) - Edit at your own risk: evaluating the robustness of edited models to
distribution shifts [0.0]
We investigate how model editing affects the general robustness of a model, as well as the robustness of the specific behavior targeted by the edit.
We find that edits tend to reduce general robustness, but that the degree of degradation depends on the editing algorithm and layers chosen.
Motivated by these observations we introduce a new model editing algorithm, 1-layer (1-LI), which uses weight-space to navigate the trade-off between editing task accuracy and general robustness.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-02-28T19:41:37Z) - Memory-Based Model Editing at Scale [102.28475739907498]
Existing model editors struggle to accurately model an edit's intended scope.
We propose Semi-Parametric Editing with a Retrieval-Augmented Counterfactual Model (SERAC)
SERAC stores edits in an explicit memory and learns to reason over them to modulate the base model's predictions as needed.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-06-13T23:40:34Z) - End-to-End Visual Editing with a Generatively Pre-Trained Artist [78.5922562526874]
We consider the targeted image editing problem: blending a region in a source image with a driver image that specifies the desired change.
We propose a self-supervised approach that simulates edits by augmenting off-the-shelf images in a target domain.
We show that different blending effects can be learned by an intuitive control of the augmentation process, with no other changes required to the model architecture.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-05-03T17:59:30Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.