Unveiling the Generalization Power of Fine-Tuned Large Language Models

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2403.09162v1
• Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2024 08:18:59 GMT
• Title: Unveiling the Generalization Power of Fine-Tuned Large Language Models
• Authors: Haoran Yang, Yumeng Zhang, Jiaqi Xu, Hongyuan Lu, Pheng Ann Heng, Wai Lam,
• Abstract summary: We investigate whether fine-tuning affects the intrinsic generalization ability intrinsic to Large Language Models (LLMs) Our main findings reveal that models fine-tuned on generation and classification tasks exhibit dissimilar behaviors in generalizing to different domains and tasks. We observe that integrating the in-context learning strategy during fine-tuning on generation tasks can enhance the model's generalization ability.
• Score: 81.70754292058258
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: While Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated exceptional multitasking abilities, fine-tuning these models on downstream, domain-specific datasets is often necessary to yield superior performance on test sets compared to their counterparts without fine-tuning. However, the comprehensive effects of fine-tuning on the LLMs' generalization ability are not fully understood. This paper delves into the differences between original, unmodified LLMs and their fine-tuned variants. Our primary investigation centers on whether fine-tuning affects the generalization ability intrinsic to LLMs. To elaborate on this, we conduct extensive experiments across five distinct language tasks on various datasets. Our main findings reveal that models fine-tuned on generation and classification tasks exhibit dissimilar behaviors in generalizing to different domains and tasks. Intriguingly, we observe that integrating the in-context learning strategy during fine-tuning on generation tasks can enhance the model's generalization ability. Through this systematic investigation, we aim to contribute valuable insights into the evolving landscape of fine-tuning practices for LLMs.

Related papers

• Aggregation Artifacts in Subjective Tasks Collapse Large Language Models' Posteriors [74.04775677110179]
  In-context Learning (ICL) has become the primary method for performing natural language tasks with Large Language Models (LLMs) In this work, we examine whether this is the result of the aggregation used in corresponding datasets, where trying to combine low-agreement, disparate annotations might lead to annotation artifacts that create detrimental noise in the prompt. Our results indicate that aggregation is a confounding factor in the modeling of subjective tasks, and advocate focusing on modeling individuals instead.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-17T17:16:00Z)
• Mixing It Up: The Cocktail Effect of Multi-Task Fine-Tuning on LLM Performance -- A Case Study in Finance [0.32985979395737774]
  We study the application of large language models (LLMs) in domain-specific contexts, including finance. We find that fine-tuning exclusively on the target task is not always the most effective strategy. Instead, multi-task fine-tuning can significantly enhance performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-01T22:35:56Z)
• Fine-tuning Large Language Models for Entity Matching [3.7277730514654555]
  Generative large language models (LLMs) are a promising alternative to pre-trained language models for entity matching. This paper explores the potential of fine-tuning LLMs for entity matching.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-12T16:20:57Z)
• Benchmarking General-Purpose In-Context Learning [19.40952728849431]
  In-context learning (ICL) empowers generative models to address new tasks effectively and efficiently on the fly. In this paper, we study extending ICL to address a broader range of tasks with an extended learning horizon and higher improvement potential. We introduce two benchmarks specifically crafted to train and evaluate GPICL functionalities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-27T14:50:42Z)
• The Strong Pull of Prior Knowledge in Large Language Models and Its Impact on Emotion Recognition [74.04775677110179]
  In-context Learning (ICL) has emerged as a powerful paradigm for performing natural language tasks with Large Language Models (LLM) We show that LLMs have strong yet inconsistent priors in emotion recognition that ossify their predictions. Our results suggest that caution is needed when using ICL with larger LLMs for affect-centered tasks outside their pre-training domain.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-25T19:07:32Z)
• Towards Modeling Learner Performance with Large Language Models [7.002923425715133]
  This paper investigates whether the pattern recognition and sequence modeling capabilities of LLMs can be extended to the domain of knowledge tracing. We compare two approaches to using LLMs for this task, zero-shot prompting and model fine-tuning, with existing, non-LLM approaches to knowledge tracing. While LLM-based approaches do not achieve state-of-the-art performance, fine-tuned LLMs surpass the performance of naive baseline models and perform on par with standard Bayesian Knowledge Tracing approaches.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-29T14:06:34Z)
• Supervised Knowledge Makes Large Language Models Better In-context Learners [94.89301696512776]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) exhibit emerging in-context learning abilities through prompt engineering. The challenge of improving the generalizability and factuality of LLMs in natural language understanding and question answering remains under-explored. We propose a framework that enhances the reliability of LLMs as it: 1) generalizes out-of-distribution data, 2) elucidates how LLMs benefit from discriminative models, and 3) minimizes hallucinations in generative tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-26T07:24:46Z)
• Specialist or Generalist? Instruction Tuning for Specific NLP Tasks [58.422495509760154]
  We investigate whether incorporating broad-coverage generalist instruction tuning can contribute to building a specialist model. Our experiments assess four target tasks with distinct coverage levels. The effect is particularly pronounced when the amount of task-specific training data is limited.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-23T19:46:48Z)
• On the Compositional Generalization Gap of In-Context Learning [73.09193595292233]
  We look at the gap between the in-distribution (ID) and out-of-distribution (OOD) performance of such models in semantic parsing tasks with in-context learning. We evaluate four model families, OPT, BLOOM, CodeGen and Codex on three semantic parsing datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-15T19:56:37Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.