Understanding the Factors Influencing Self-Managed Enterprises of Crowdworkers: A Comprehensive Review

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2403.12769v2
• Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2024 21:17:20 GMT
• Title: Understanding the Factors Influencing Self-Managed Enterprises of Crowdworkers: A Comprehensive Review
• Authors: Alexandre Prestes Uchoa, Daniel Schneider,
• Abstract summary: This paper investigates the shift in crowdsourcing towards self-managed enterprises of crowdworkers (SMECs) It reviews the literature to understand the foundational aspects of this shift, focusing on identifying key factors that may explain the rise of SMECs. The study aims to guide future research and inform policy and platform development, emphasizing the importance of fair labor practices in this evolving landscape.
• Score: 49.623146117284115
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: This paper investigates the shift in crowdsourcing towards self-managed enterprises of crowdworkers (SMECs), diverging from traditional platform-controlled models. It reviews the literature to understand the foundational aspects of this shift, focusing on identifying key factors that may explain the rise of SMECs, particularly concerning power dynamics and tensions between Online Labor Platforms (OLPs) and crowdworkers. The study aims to guide future research and inform policy and platform development, emphasizing the importance of fair labor practices in this evolving landscape.

Related papers

• Ten Challenging Problems in Federated Foundation Models [55.343738234307544]
  Federated Foundation Models (FedFMs) represent a distributed learning paradigm that fuses general competences of foundation models as well as privacy-preserving capabilities of federated learning. This paper provides a comprehensive summary of the ten challenging problems inherent in FedFMs, encompassing foundational theory, utilization of private data, continual learning, unlearning, Non-IID and graph data, bidirectional knowledge transfer, incentive mechanism design, game mechanism design, model watermarking, and efficiency.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-14T04:01:15Z)
• Employee Turnover Prediction: A Cross-component Attention Transformer with Consideration of Competitor Influence and Contagious Effect [12.879229546467117]
  We propose a novel deep learning approach based on job embeddedness theory to predict the turnovers of individual employees across different firms. Our developed method demonstrates superior performance over several state-of-the-art benchmark methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-31T22:25:39Z)
• Persuasion with Large Language Models: a Survey [49.86930318312291]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have created new disruptive possibilities for persuasive communication. In areas such as politics, marketing, public health, e-commerce, and charitable giving, such LLM Systems have already achieved human-level or even super-human persuasiveness. Our survey suggests that the current and future potential of LLM-based persuasion poses profound ethical and societal risks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-11T10:05:52Z)
• The Imperative of Conversation Analysis in the Era of LLMs: A Survey of Tasks, Techniques, and Trends [64.99423243200296]
  Conversation Analysis (CA) strives to uncover and analyze critical information from conversation data. In this paper, we perform a thorough review and systematize CA task to summarize the existing related work. We derive four key steps of CA from conversation scene reconstruction, to in-depth attribution analysis, and then to performing targeted training, finally generating conversations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-21T16:52:43Z)
• Rideshare Transparency: Translating Gig Worker Insights on AI Platform Design to Policy [8.936861276568006]
  We identify transparency-related harms, mitigation strategies, and worker needs. We use a novel mixed-methods study combining an LLM-based analysis of over 1 million comments posted to online platform worker communities. We argue that new regulations requiring platforms to publish public transparency reports may be a more effective solution to improve worker well-being.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-16T00:46:49Z)
• Position: Foundation Agents as the Paradigm Shift for Decision Making [24.555816843983003]
  We advocate for the construction of foundation agents as a transformative shift in the learning paradigm of agents. We specify the roadmap of foundation agents from large interactive data collection or generation to self-supervised pretraining and adaptation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-27T09:54:50Z)
• Occupation Life Cycle [16.618743552104192]
  This paper introduces the Occupation Life Cycle (OLC) model to explore the trajectory of occupations. Using job posting data from one of China's largest recruitment platforms, we track the fluctuations and emerging trends in the labor market from 2018 to 2023. Our findings offer a unique perspective on the interplay between occupational evolution and economic factors, with a particular focus on the Chinese labor market.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-15T03:13:51Z)
• LLM as a Mastermind: A Survey of Strategic Reasoning with Large Language Models [75.89014602596673]
  Strategic reasoning requires understanding and predicting adversary actions in multi-agent settings while adjusting strategies accordingly. We explore the scopes, applications, methodologies, and evaluation metrics related to strategic reasoning with Large Language Models. It underscores the importance of strategic reasoning as a critical cognitive capability and offers insights into future research directions and potential improvements.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-01T16:50:54Z)
• Causal Fairness Analysis [68.12191782657437]
  We introduce a framework for understanding, modeling, and possibly solving issues of fairness in decision-making settings. The main insight of our approach will be to link the quantification of the disparities present on the observed data with the underlying, and often unobserved, collection of causal mechanisms. Our effort culminates in the Fairness Map, which is the first systematic attempt to organize and explain the relationship between different criteria found in the literature.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-07-23T01:06:34Z)
• Assessing the Fairness of AI Systems: AI Practitioners' Processes, Challenges, and Needs for Support [18.148737010217953]
  We conduct interviews and workshops with AI practitioners to identify practitioners' processes, challenges, and needs for support. We find that practitioners face challenges when choosing performance metrics, identifying the most relevant direct stakeholders and demographic groups. We identify impacts on fairness work stemming from a lack of engagement with direct stakeholders, business imperatives that prioritize customers over marginalized groups, and the drive to deploy AI systems at scale.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-12-10T17:14:34Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.