Elevating Software Quality in Agile Environments: The Role of Testing Professionals in Unit Testing

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2403.13220v1
• Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2024 00:41:49 GMT
• Title: Elevating Software Quality in Agile Environments: The Role of Testing Professionals in Unit Testing
• Authors: Lucas Neves, Oscar Campos, Robson Santos, Italo Santos, Cleyton Magalhaes, Ronnie de Souza Santos,
• Abstract summary: Testing is an essential quality activity in the software development process. This paper explores the participation of test engineers in unit testing within an industrial context.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Testing is an essential quality activity in the software development process. Usually, a software system is tested on several levels, starting with unit testing that checks the smallest parts of the code until acceptance testing, which is focused on the validations with the end-user. Historically, unit testing has been the domain of developers, who are responsible for ensuring the accuracy of their code. However, in agile environments, testing professionals play an integral role in various quality improvement initiatives throughout each development cycle. This paper explores the participation of test engineers in unit testing within an industrial context, employing a survey-based research methodology. Our findings demonstrate that testing professionals have the potential to strengthen unit testing by collaborating with developers to craft thorough test cases and fostering a culture of mutual learning and cooperation, ultimately contributing to increasing the overall quality of software projects.

Related papers

• Disrupting Test Development with AI Assistants [1.024113475677323]
  Generative AI-assisted coding tools like GitHub Copilot, ChatGPT, and Tabnine have significantly transformed software development. This paper analyzes how these innovations impact productivity and software test development metrics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-04T17:52:40Z)
• Codev-Bench: How Do LLMs Understand Developer-Centric Code Completion? [60.84912551069379]
  We present the Code-Development Benchmark (Codev-Bench), a fine-grained, real-world, repository-level, and developer-centric evaluation framework. Codev-Agent is an agent-based system that automates repository crawling, constructs execution environments, extracts dynamic calling chains from existing unit tests, and generates new test samples to avoid data leakage.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-02T09:11:10Z)
• Multi-language Unit Test Generation using LLMs [6.259245181881262]
  We describe a generic pipeline that incorporates static analysis to guide LLMs in generating compilable and high-coverage test cases. We show how the pipeline can be applied to different programming languages, specifically Java and Python, and to complex software requiring environment mocking. Our results demonstrate that LLM-based test generation, when guided by static analysis, can be competitive with, and even outperform, state-of-the-art test-generation techniques in coverage achieved.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-04T21:46:18Z)
• Which Combination of Test Metrics Can Predict Success of a Software Project? A Case Study in a Year-Long Project Course [1.553083901660282]
  Testing plays an important role in securing the success of a software development project. We investigate whether we can quantify the effects various types of testing have on functional suitability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-22T04:23:51Z)
• A System for Automated Unit Test Generation Using Large Language Models and Assessment of Generated Test Suites [1.4563527353943984]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have been applied to various aspects of software development. We present AgoneTest: an automated system for generating test suites for Java projects.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-14T23:02:16Z)
• Leveraging Large Language Models for Efficient Failure Analysis in Game Development [47.618236610219554]
  This paper proposes a new approach to automatically identify which change in the code caused a test to fail. The method leverages Large Language Models (LLMs) to associate error messages with the corresponding code changes causing the failure. Our approach reaches an accuracy of 71% in our newly created dataset, which comprises issues reported by developers at EA over a period of one year.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-11T09:21:50Z)
• DevBench: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Software Development [72.24266814625685]
  DevBench is a benchmark that evaluates large language models (LLMs) across various stages of the software development lifecycle. Empirical studies show that current LLMs, including GPT-4-Turbo, fail to solve the challenges presented within DevBench. Our findings offer actionable insights for the future development of LLMs toward real-world programming applications.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-13T15:13:44Z)
• Observation-based unit test generation at Meta [52.4716552057909]
  TestGen automatically generates unit tests, carved from serialized observations of complex objects, observed during app execution. TestGen has landed 518 tests into production, which have been executed 9,617,349 times in continuous integration, finding 5,702 faults. Our evaluation reveals that, when carving its observations from 4,361 reliable end-to-end tests, TestGen was able to generate tests for at least 86% of the classes covered by end-to-end tests.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-09T00:34:39Z)
• Software Testing and Code Refactoring: A Survey with Practitioners [3.977213079821398]
  This study aims to explore how software testing professionals deal with code to understand the benefits and limitations of this practice in the context of software testing. We concluded that in the context of software testing, offers several benefits, such as supporting the maintenance of automated tests and improving the performance of the testing team. Our study raises discussions on the importance of having testing professionals implement in the code of automated tests, allowing them to improve their coding abilities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-03T01:07:39Z)
• SUPERNOVA: Automating Test Selection and Defect Prevention in AAA Video Games Using Risk Based Testing and Machine Learning [62.997667081978825]
  Testing video games is an increasingly difficult task as traditional methods fail to scale with growing software systems. We present SUPERNOVA, a system responsible for test selection and defect prevention while also functioning as an automation hub. The direct impact of this has been observed to be a reduction in 55% or more testing hours for an undisclosed sports game title.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-10T00:47:46Z)
• Beyond Accuracy: Behavioral Testing of NLP models with CheckList [66.42971817954806]
  CheckList is a task-agnostic methodology for testing NLP models. CheckList includes a matrix of general linguistic capabilities and test types that facilitate comprehensive test ideation. In a user study, NLP practitioners with CheckList created twice as many tests, and found almost three times as many bugs as users without it.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-05-08T15:48:31Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.