Mapping LLM Security Landscapes: A Comprehensive Stakeholder Risk Assessment Proposal

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2403.13309v1
• Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2024 05:17:22 GMT
• Title: Mapping LLM Security Landscapes: A Comprehensive Stakeholder Risk Assessment Proposal
• Authors: Rahul Pankajakshan, Sumitra Biswal, Yuvaraj Govindarajulu, Gilad Gressel,
• Abstract summary: We propose a risk assessment process using tools like the risk rating methodology which is used for traditional systems. We conduct scenario analysis to identify potential threat agents and map the dependent system components against vulnerability factors. We also map threats against three key stakeholder groups.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: The rapid integration of Large Language Models (LLMs) across diverse sectors has marked a transformative era, showcasing remarkable capabilities in text generation and problem-solving tasks. However, this technological advancement is accompanied by significant risks and vulnerabilities. Despite ongoing security enhancements, attackers persistently exploit these weaknesses, casting doubts on the overall trustworthiness of LLMs. Compounding the issue, organisations are deploying LLM-integrated systems without understanding the severity of potential consequences. Existing studies by OWASP and MITRE offer a general overview of threats and vulnerabilities but lack a method for directly and succinctly analysing the risks for security practitioners, developers, and key decision-makers who are working with this novel technology. To address this gap, we propose a risk assessment process using tools like the OWASP risk rating methodology which is used for traditional systems. We conduct scenario analysis to identify potential threat agents and map the dependent system components against vulnerability factors. Through this analysis, we assess the likelihood of a cyberattack. Subsequently, we conduct a thorough impact analysis to derive a comprehensive threat matrix. We also map threats against three key stakeholder groups: developers engaged in model fine-tuning, application developers utilizing third-party APIs, and end users. The proposed threat matrix provides a holistic evaluation of LLM-related risks, enabling stakeholders to make informed decisions for effective mitigation strategies. Our outlined process serves as an actionable and comprehensive tool for security practitioners, offering insights for resource management and enhancing the overall system security.

Related papers

• Multi-Agent Risks from Advanced AI [90.74347101431474]
  Multi-agent systems of advanced AI pose novel and under-explored risks. We identify three key failure modes based on agents' incentives, as well as seven key risk factors. We highlight several important instances of each risk, as well as promising directions to help mitigate them.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-19T23:03:21Z)
• LLM Cyber Evaluations Don't Capture Real-World Risk [0.0]
  Large language models (LLMs) are demonstrating increasing prowess in cybersecurity applications. We argue that current efforts to evaluate risks posed by these capabilities are misaligned with the goal of understanding real-world impact.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-31T05:33:48Z)
• ChatNVD: Advancing Cybersecurity Vulnerability Assessment with Large Language Models [0.46873264197900916]
  This paper explores the potential application of Large Language Models (LLMs) to enhance the assessment of software vulnerabilities. We develop three variants of ChatNVD, utilizing three prominent LLMs: GPT-4o mini by OpenAI, Llama 3 by Meta, and Gemini 1.5 Pro by Google. To evaluate their efficacy, we conduct a comparative analysis of these models using a comprehensive questionnaire comprising common security vulnerability questions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-06T03:45:49Z)
• Navigating the Risks: A Survey of Security, Privacy, and Ethics Threats in LLM-Based Agents [67.07177243654485]
  This survey collects and analyzes the different threats faced by large language models-based agents. We identify six key features of LLM-based agents, based on which we summarize the current research progress. We select four representative agents as case studies to analyze the risks they may face in practical use.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-14T15:40:04Z)
• SafeBench: A Safety Evaluation Framework for Multimodal Large Language Models [75.67623347512368]
  We propose toolns, a comprehensive framework designed for conducting safety evaluations of MLLMs. Our framework consists of a comprehensive harmful query dataset and an automated evaluation protocol. Based on our framework, we conducted large-scale experiments on 15 widely-used open-source MLLMs and 6 commercial MLLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-24T17:14:40Z)
• EARBench: Towards Evaluating Physical Risk Awareness for Task Planning of Foundation Model-based Embodied AI Agents [53.717918131568936]
  Embodied artificial intelligence (EAI) integrates advanced AI models into physical entities for real-world interaction. Foundation models as the "brain" of EAI agents for high-level task planning have shown promising results. However, the deployment of these agents in physical environments presents significant safety challenges. This study introduces EARBench, a novel framework for automated physical risk assessment in EAI scenarios.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-08T13:19:37Z)
• Threat Modelling and Risk Analysis for Large Language Model (LLM)-Powered Applications [0.0]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have revolutionized various applications by providing advanced natural language processing capabilities. This paper explores the threat modeling and risk analysis specifically tailored for LLM-powered applications.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-16T16:43:58Z)
• Asset-centric Threat Modeling for AI-based Systems [7.696807063718328]
  This paper presents ThreatFinderAI, an approach and tool to model AI-related assets, threats, countermeasures, and quantify residual risks. To evaluate the practicality of the approach, participants were tasked to recreate a threat model developed by cybersecurity experts of an AI-based healthcare platform. Overall, the solution's usability was well-perceived and effectively supports threat identification and risk discussion.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-11T08:40:01Z)
• Prioritizing Safeguarding Over Autonomy: Risks of LLM Agents for Science [65.77763092833348]
  Intelligent agents powered by large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated substantial promise in autonomously conducting experiments and facilitating scientific discoveries across various disciplines. While their capabilities are promising, these agents also introduce novel vulnerabilities that demand careful consideration for safety. This paper conducts a thorough examination of vulnerabilities in LLM-based agents within scientific domains, shedding light on potential risks associated with their misuse and emphasizing the need for safety measures.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-06T18:54:07Z)
• A Framework for Evaluating the Cybersecurity Risk of Real World, Machine Learning Production Systems [41.470634460215564]
  We develop an extension to the MulVAL attack graph generation and analysis framework to incorporate cyberattacks on ML production systems. Using the proposed extension, security practitioners can apply attack graph analysis methods in environments that include ML components.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-07-05T05:58:11Z)
• Dos and Don'ts of Machine Learning in Computer Security [74.1816306998445]
  Despite great potential, machine learning in security is prone to subtle pitfalls that undermine its performance. We identify common pitfalls in the design, implementation, and evaluation of learning-based security systems. We propose actionable recommendations to support researchers in avoiding or mitigating the pitfalls where possible.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-19T13:09:31Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.