MathVerse: Does Your Multi-modal LLM Truly See the Diagrams in Visual Math Problems?

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2403.14624v2
• Date: Sun, 18 Aug 2024 08:10:16 GMT
• Title: MathVerse: Does Your Multi-modal LLM Truly See the Diagrams in Visual Math Problems?
• Authors: Renrui Zhang, Dongzhi Jiang, Yichi Zhang, Haokun Lin, Ziyu Guo, Pengshuo Qiu, Aojun Zhou, Pan Lu, Kai-Wei Chang, Peng Gao, Hongsheng Li,
• Abstract summary: We introduce MathVerse, an all-around visual math benchmark designed for an equitable and in-depth evaluation of MLLMs. We meticulously collect 2,612 high-quality, multi-subject math problems with diagrams from publicly available sources. This approach allows MathVerse to comprehensively assess whether and how much MLLMs can truly understand the visual diagrams for mathematical reasoning.
• Score: 99.0305256706604
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: The remarkable progress of Multi-modal Large Language Models (MLLMs) has garnered unparalleled attention, due to their superior performance in visual contexts. However, their capabilities in visual math problem-solving remain insufficiently evaluated and understood. We investigate current benchmarks to incorporate excessive visual content within textual questions, which potentially assist MLLMs in deducing answers without truly interpreting the input diagrams. To this end, we introduce MathVerse, an all-around visual math benchmark designed for an equitable and in-depth evaluation of MLLMs. We meticulously collect 2,612 high-quality, multi-subject math problems with diagrams from publicly available sources. Each problem is then transformed by human annotators into six distinct versions, each offering varying degrees of information content in multi-modality, contributing to 15K test samples in total. This approach allows MathVerse to comprehensively assess whether and how much MLLMs can truly understand the visual diagrams for mathematical reasoning. In addition, we propose a Chain-of-Thought (CoT) evaluation strategy for a fine-grained assessment of the output answers. Rather than naively judging True or False, we employ GPT-4(V) to adaptively extract crucial reasoning steps, and then score each step with detailed error analysis, which can reveal the intermediate CoT reasoning quality by MLLMs. We hope the MathVerse benchmark may provide unique insights to guide the future development of MLLMs. Project page: https://mathverse-cuhk.github.io

Related papers

• DynaMath: A Dynamic Visual Benchmark for Evaluating Mathematical Reasoning Robustness of Vision Language Models [19.787224412654872]
  We introduce DynaMath, a dynamic visual math benchmark designed for in-depth assessment of Vision-Language Models (VLMs) DynaMath includes 501 high-quality, multi-topic seed questions, each represented as a Python program. Our results show that the worst-case model accuracy, defined as the percentage of correctly answered seed questions in all 10 variants, is significantly lower than the average-case accuracy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-29T17:29:19Z)
• Polymath: A Challenging Multi-modal Mathematical Reasoning Benchmark [53.61633384281524]
  PolyMATH is a benchmark aimed at evaluating the general cognitive reasoning abilities of MLLMs. The best scores achieved on PolyMATH are 41%, 36%, and 27%, obtained by Claude-3.5 Sonnet, GPT-4o and Gemini-1.5 Pro respectively. A further fine-grained error analysis reveals that these models struggle to understand spatial relations and perform drawn-out, high-level reasoning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-06T20:35:41Z)
• Math-PUMA: Progressive Upward Multimodal Alignment to Enhance Mathematical Reasoning [5.9767694994869425]
  Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) excel in solving text-based mathematical problems. They struggle with mathematical diagrams since they are primarily trained on natural scene images. We propose Math-PUMA, a methodology focused on Progressive Upward Multimodal Alignment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-16T10:11:05Z)
• MathScape: Evaluating MLLMs in multimodal Math Scenarios through a Hierarchical Benchmark [29.9945601202065]
  We propose MathScape, a new benchmark that emphasizes the understanding and application of combined visual and textual information. MathScape is designed to evaluate photo-based math problem scenarios, assessing the theoretical understanding and application ability of MLLMs. We conduct a multi-dimensional evaluation on 11 advanced MLLMs, revealing that our benchmark is challenging even for the most sophisticated models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-14T13:23:43Z)
• AI-Assisted Generation of Difficult Math Questions [78.7547836422727]
  Current training positions mathematical reasoning as a core capability. There is unmet demand for diverse and challenging math questions. We present a design framework that combines the strengths of LLMs with a human-in-the-loop approach.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-30T17:55:36Z)
• Math-LLaVA: Bootstrapping Mathematical Reasoning for Multimodal Large Language Models [62.815222721144636]
  We introduce Math-LLaVA, a LLaVA-1.5-based model fine-tuned with MathV360K. This novel approach significantly improves the multimodal mathematical reasoning capabilities of LLaVA-1.5. Math-LLaVA demonstrates enhanced generalizability, showing substantial improvements on the MMMU benchmark.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-25T05:43:21Z)
• MathBench: Evaluating the Theory and Application Proficiency of LLMs with a Hierarchical Mathematics Benchmark [82.64129627675123]
  MathBench is a new benchmark that rigorously assesses the mathematical capabilities of large language models. MathBench spans a wide range of mathematical disciplines, offering a detailed evaluation of both theoretical understanding and practical problem-solving skills.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-20T17:52:29Z)
• Can LLMs Master Math? Investigating Large Language Models on Math Stack Exchange [25.419977967846144]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated exceptional capabilities in various natural language tasks. This paper explores the current limitations of LLMs in navigating complex mathematical problem-solving.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-30T12:48:31Z)
• GSM-Plus: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Evaluating the Robustness of LLMs as Mathematical Problem Solvers [68.77382332826167]
  Large language models (LLMs) have achieved impressive performance across various mathematical reasoning benchmarks. One essential and frequently occurring evidence is that when the math questions are slightly changed, LLMs can behave incorrectly. This motivates us to evaluate the robustness of LLMs' math reasoning capability by testing a wide range of question variations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-29T15:26:14Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.