Gene Regulatory Network Inference in the Presence of Dropouts: a Causal View

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2403.15500v1
• Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2024 21:27:43 GMT
• Title: Gene Regulatory Network Inference in the Presence of Dropouts: a Causal View
• Abstract summary: Gene regulatory network inference (GRNI) is a challenging problem owing to the presence of zeros in single-cell RNA sequencing data. We introduce a causal graphical model to characterize the dropout mechanism, namely, Causal Dropout Model. We show that the causal dropout model can be validated from data, and many existing statistical models to handle dropouts fit into our model as specific parametric instances.
• Score: 15.628930397391137
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Gene regulatory network inference (GRNI) is a challenging problem, particularly owing to the presence of zeros in single-cell RNA sequencing data: some are biological zeros representing no gene expression, while some others are technical zeros arising from the sequencing procedure (aka dropouts), which may bias GRNI by distorting the joint distribution of the measured gene expressions. Existing approaches typically handle dropout error via imputation, which may introduce spurious relations as the true joint distribution is generally unidentifiable. To tackle this issue, we introduce a causal graphical model to characterize the dropout mechanism, namely, Causal Dropout Model. We provide a simple yet effective theoretical result: interestingly, the conditional independence (CI) relations in the data with dropouts, after deleting the samples with zero values (regardless if technical or not) for the conditioned variables, are asymptotically identical to the CI relations in the original data without dropouts. This particular test-wise deletion procedure, in which we perform CI tests on the samples without zeros for the conditioned variables, can be seamlessly integrated with existing structure learning approaches including constraint-based and greedy score-based methods, thus giving rise to a principled framework for GRNI in the presence of dropouts. We further show that the causal dropout model can be validated from data, and many existing statistical models to handle dropouts fit into our model as specific parametric instances. Empirical evaluation on synthetic, curated, and real-world experimental transcriptomic data comprehensively demonstrate the efficacy of our method.

Related papers

• CANN-EUCLID: unsupervised constitutive artificial neural network model discovery from full-field data [0.0]
  Constitutive artificial neural networks (CANNs) provide interpretable material model discovery.<n>CANNs have so far been used in stress-inducing settings based on apparent stress-strain data from homogeneous tests.<n>Here, we combine CANNs with the stress-unsupervised full-field discovery framework EUCLID to identify sparse hyperelastic laws.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-12T15:44:06Z)
• On the Limits of Self-Improving in LLMs and Why AGI, ASI and the Singularity Are Not Near Without Symbolic Model Synthesis [0.01269104766024433]
  We formalise self-training in Large Language Models (LLMs) and Generative AI as a discrete-time dynamical system.<n>We derive two fundamental failure modes: (1) Entropy Decay, where finite sampling effects cause a monotonic loss of distributional diversity (mode collapse), and (2) Variance Amplification, where the loss of external grounding causes the model's representation of truth to drift as a random walk.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-05T19:50:49Z)
• A Sample Efficient Conditional Independence Test in the Presence of Discretization [54.047334792855345]
  Conditional Independence (CI) tests directly to discretized data can lead to incorrect conclusions.<n>Recent advancements have sought to infer the correct CI relationship between the latent variables through binarizing observed data.<n>Motivated by this, this paper introduces a sample-efficient CI test that does not rely on the binarization process.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-10T12:41:26Z)
• Demystifying amortized causal discovery with transformers [21.058343547918053]
  Supervised learning approaches for causal discovery from observational data often achieve competitive performance. In this work, we investigate CSIvA, a transformer-based model promising to train on synthetic data and transfer to real data. We bridge the gap with existing identifiability theory and show that constraints on the training data distribution implicitly define a prior on the test observations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-27T08:17:49Z)
• Federated Causal Discovery from Heterogeneous Data [70.31070224690399]
  We propose a novel FCD method attempting to accommodate arbitrary causal models and heterogeneous data. These approaches involve constructing summary statistics as a proxy of the raw data to protect data privacy. We conduct extensive experiments on synthetic and real datasets to show the efficacy of our method.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-20T18:53:53Z)
• Sample, estimate, aggregate: A recipe for causal discovery foundation models [28.116832159265964]
  Causal discovery has the potential to uncover mechanistic insights from biological experiments. We propose a supervised model trained on large-scale, synthetic data to predict causal graphs. Our approach is enabled by the observation that typical errors in the outputs of a discovery algorithm remain comparable across datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-02T21:57:58Z)
• Sufficient Identification Conditions and Semiparametric Estimation under Missing Not at Random Mechanisms [4.211128681972148]
  Conducting valid statistical analyses is challenging in the presence of missing-not-at-random (MNAR) data. We consider a MNAR model that generalizes several prior popular MNAR models in two ways. We propose methods for testing the independence restrictions encoded in such models using odds ratio as our parameter of interest.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-10T13:46:16Z)
• Breaking the Spurious Causality of Conditional Generation via Fairness Intervention with Corrective Sampling [77.15766509677348]
  Conditional generative models often inherit spurious correlations from the training dataset. This can result in label-conditional distributions that are imbalanced with respect to another latent attribute. We propose a general two-step strategy to mitigate this issue.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-05T08:09:33Z)
• Characterization and Greedy Learning of Gaussian Structural Causal Models under Unknown Interventions [3.441021278275805]
  We consider the problem of recovering the causal structure underlying observations when the targets of the interventions in each experiment are unknown. We derive a greedy algorithm called GnIES to recover the equivalence class of the data-generating model without knowledge of the intervention targets. We leverage this procedure and evaluate the performance of GnIES on synthetic, real, and semi-synthetic data sets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-27T17:37:21Z)
• Learning Causal Representations of Single Cells via Sparse Mechanism Shift Modeling [3.2435888122704037]
  We propose a deep generative model of single-cell gene expression data for which each perturbation is treated as an intervention targeting an unknown, but sparse, subset of latent variables. We benchmark these methods on simulated single-cell data to evaluate their performance at latent units recovery, causal target identification and out-of-domain generalization.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-07T15:47:40Z)
• Equivariance Allows Handling Multiple Nuisance Variables When Analyzing Pooled Neuroimaging Datasets [53.34152466646884]
  In this paper, we show how bringing recent results on equivariant representation learning instantiated on structured spaces together with simple use of classical results on causal inference provides an effective practical solution. We demonstrate how our model allows dealing with more than one nuisance variable under some assumptions and can enable analysis of pooled scientific datasets in scenarios that would otherwise entail removing a large portion of the samples.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-29T04:54:06Z)
• Contrastive Model Inversion for Data-Free Knowledge Distillation [60.08025054715192]
  We propose Contrastive Model Inversion, where the data diversity is explicitly modeled as an optimizable objective. Our main observation is that, under the constraint of the same amount of data, higher data diversity usually indicates stronger instance discrimination. Experiments on CIFAR-10, CIFAR-100, and Tiny-ImageNet demonstrate that CMI achieves significantly superior performance when the generated data are used for knowledge distillation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-18T15:13:00Z)
• Efficient Causal Inference from Combined Observational and Interventional Data through Causal Reductions [68.6505592770171]
  Unobserved confounding is one of the main challenges when estimating causal effects. We propose a novel causal reduction method that replaces an arbitrary number of possibly high-dimensional latent confounders. We propose a learning algorithm to estimate the parameterized reduced model jointly from observational and interventional data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-03-08T14:29:07Z)
• Good Classifiers are Abundant in the Interpolating Regime [64.72044662855612]
  We develop a methodology to compute precisely the full distribution of test errors among interpolating classifiers. We find that test errors tend to concentrate around a small typical value $varepsilon*$, which deviates substantially from the test error of worst-case interpolating model. Our results show that the usual style of analysis in statistical learning theory may not be fine-grained enough to capture the good generalization performance observed in practice.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-22T21:12:31Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.