How Reliable is Your Simulator? Analysis on the Limitations of Current LLM-based User Simulators for Conversational Recommendation

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2403.16416v1
• Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2024 04:21:06 GMT
• Title: How Reliable is Your Simulator? Analysis on the Limitations of Current LLM-based User Simulators for Conversational Recommendation
• Authors: Lixi Zhu, Xiaowen Huang, Jitao Sang,
• Abstract summary: We analyze the limitations of using Large Language Models in constructing user simulators for Conversational Recommender System. Data leakage, which occurs in conversational history and the user simulator's replies, results in inflated evaluation results. We propose SimpleUserSim, employing a straightforward strategy to guide the topic toward the target items.
• Score: 14.646529557978512
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
• Abstract: Conversational Recommender System (CRS) interacts with users through natural language to understand their preferences and provide personalized recommendations in real-time. CRS has demonstrated significant potential, prompting researchers to address the development of more realistic and reliable user simulators as a key focus. Recently, the capabilities of Large Language Models (LLMs) have attracted a lot of attention in various fields. Simultaneously, efforts are underway to construct user simulators based on LLMs. While these works showcase innovation, they also come with certain limitations that require attention. In this work, we aim to analyze the limitations of using LLMs in constructing user simulators for CRS, to guide future research. To achieve this goal, we conduct analytical validation on the notable work, iEvaLM. Through multiple experiments on two widely-used datasets in the field of conversational recommendation, we highlight several issues with the current evaluation methods for user simulators based on LLMs: (1) Data leakage, which occurs in conversational history and the user simulator's replies, results in inflated evaluation results. (2) The success of CRS recommendations depends more on the availability and quality of conversational history than on the responses from user simulators. (3) Controlling the output of the user simulator through a single prompt template proves challenging. To overcome these limitations, we propose SimpleUserSim, employing a straightforward strategy to guide the topic toward the target items. Our study validates the ability of CRS models to utilize the interaction information, significantly improving the recommendation results.

Related papers

• Stop Playing the Guessing Game! Target-free User Simulation for Evaluating Conversational Recommender Systems [15.481944998961847]
  PEPPER is an evaluation protocol with target-free user simulators constructed from real-user interaction histories and reviews. PEPPER enables realistic user-CRS dialogues without falling into simplistic guessing games. PEPPER presents detailed measures for comprehensively evaluating the preference elicitation capabilities of CRSs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-25T07:36:20Z)
• MemSim: A Bayesian Simulator for Evaluating Memory of LLM-based Personal Assistants [64.41695570145673]
  We propose MemSim, a Bayesian simulator designed to automatically construct reliable questions and answers (QAs) from generated user messages. Based on MemSim, we generate a dataset in the daily-life scenario, named MemDaily, and conduct extensive experiments to assess the effectiveness of our approach.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-30T10:19:04Z)
• DuetSim: Building User Simulator with Dual Large Language Models for Task-Oriented Dialogues [7.765092134290888]
  This paper introduces DuetSim, a novel framework designed to address the intricate demands of task-oriented dialogues by leveraging large language models. DuetSim stands apart from conventional approaches by employing two LLMs in tandem: one dedicated to response generation and the other focused on verification. We validate the efficacy of our method through extensive experiments conducted on the MultiWOZ dataset, highlighting improvements in response quality and correctness.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-16T06:24:31Z)
• A LLM-based Controllable, Scalable, Human-Involved User Simulator Framework for Conversational Recommender Systems [14.646529557978512]
  Conversational Recommender System (CRS) leverages real-time feedback from users to dynamically model their preferences. Large Language Models (LLMs) has marked the onset of a new epoch in computational capabilities. We introduce a Controllable, scalable, and human-Involved (CSHI) simulator framework that manages the behavior of user simulators.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-13T03:02:56Z)
• USimAgent: Large Language Models for Simulating Search Users [33.17004578463697]
  We introduce a Large Language Models-based user search behavior simulator, USimAgent. The simulator can simulate users' querying, clicking, and stopping behaviors during search. Empirical investigation on a real user behavior dataset shows that the simulator outperforms existing methods in query generation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-14T07:40:54Z)
• Unlocking the Potential of User Feedback: Leveraging Large Language Model as User Simulator to Enhance Dialogue System [65.93577256431125]
  We propose an alternative approach called User-Guided Response Optimization (UGRO) to combine it with a smaller task-oriented dialogue model. This approach uses LLM as annotation-free user simulator to assess dialogue responses, combining them with smaller fine-tuned end-to-end TOD models. Our approach outperforms previous state-of-the-art (SOTA) results.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-16T13:04:56Z)
• Improving Conversational Recommendation Systems via Counterfactual Data Simulation [73.4526400381668]
  Conversational recommender systems (CRSs) aim to provide recommendation services via natural language conversations. Existing CRS approaches often suffer from the issue of insufficient training due to the scarcity of training data. We propose a CounterFactual data simulation approach for CRS, named CFCRS, to alleviate the issue of data scarcity in CRSs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-05T12:48:56Z)
• Rethinking the Evaluation for Conversational Recommendation in the Era of Large Language Models [115.7508325840751]
  The recent success of large language models (LLMs) has shown great potential to develop more powerful conversational recommender systems (CRSs) In this paper, we embark on an investigation into the utilization of ChatGPT for conversational recommendation, revealing the inadequacy of the existing evaluation protocol. We propose an interactive Evaluation approach based on LLMs named iEvaLM that harnesses LLM-based user simulators.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-22T15:12:43Z)
• Metaphorical User Simulators for Evaluating Task-oriented Dialogue Systems [80.77917437785773]
  Task-oriented dialogue systems ( TDSs) are assessed mainly in an offline setting or through human evaluation. We propose a metaphorical user simulator for end-to-end TDS evaluation, where we define a simulator to be metaphorical if it simulates user's analogical thinking in interactions with systems. We also propose a tester-based evaluation framework to generate variants, i.e., dialogue systems with different capabilities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-04-02T05:11:03Z)
• Multi-Agent Task-Oriented Dialog Policy Learning with Role-Aware Reward Decomposition [64.06167416127386]
  We propose Multi-Agent Dialog Policy Learning, which regards both the system and the user as the dialog agents. Two agents interact with each other and are jointly learned simultaneously. Results show that our method can successfully build a system policy and a user policy simultaneously.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-08T04:51:40Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.