To Err is Machine: Vulnerability Detection Challenges LLM Reasoning

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2403.17218v2
• Date: Tue, 07 Jan 2025 21:57:38 GMT
• Title: To Err is Machine: Vulnerability Detection Challenges LLM Reasoning
• Authors: Benjamin Steenhoek, Md Mahbubur Rahman, Monoshi Kumar Roy, Mirza Sanjida Alam, Hengbo Tong, Swarna Das, Earl T. Barr, Wei Le,
• Abstract summary: We present a challenging code reasoning task: vulnerability detection. State-of-the-art (SOTA) models reported only 54.5% Balanced Accuracy in our vulnerability detection evaluation. New models, new training methods, or more execution-specific pretraining data may be needed to conquer vulnerability detection.
• Score: 8.602355712876815
• License:
• Abstract: In this paper, we present a challenging code reasoning task: vulnerability detection. Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown promising results in natural-language and math reasoning, but state-of-the-art (SOTA) models reported only 54.5% Balanced Accuracy in our vulnerability detection evaluation, even those models pre-trained on large amounts of source code. Our error analysis on LLM responses shows that the models struggle to reason about the code semantics relevant to identifying vulnerabilities, especially subtle semantic differences caused by small textual changes. We explored prominent models and training settings to understand their effects on vulnerability detection performance -- including better prompts, larger models, more pre-training data, and fine-tuning -- but none led to significant improvements. This raises the question of whether simply scaling training data and model size will allow us to "solve" complex code reasoning tasks like vulnerability detection, or if a fundamental shift in modeling and training techniques is required. We also explored adding domain knowledge to prompts; although it helped certain models understand some code semantics, vulnerability detection requires multi-step reasoning, and these models still failed in steps, such as reasoning about variable relations. Our results suggest that new models, new training methods, or more execution-specific pretraining data may be needed to conquer vulnerability detection. We speculate that auto-regressive pre-training on source code may not effectively extract code semantics, especially on the current pretraining mixtures, in which execution data is scarce. Success on vulnerability detection as a code reasoning task can benefit many areas of software engineering such as debugging, test input generation, and program repair. Our code and data are available at https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.27368025.

Related papers

• What Do Learning Dynamics Reveal About Generalization in LLM Reasoning? [83.83230167222852]
  We find that a model's generalization behavior can be effectively characterized by a training metric we call pre-memorization train accuracy. By connecting a model's learning behavior to its generalization, pre-memorization train accuracy can guide targeted improvements to training strategies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-12T09:52:40Z)
• DFEPT: Data Flow Embedding for Enhancing Pre-Trained Model Based Vulnerability Detection [7.802093464108404]
  We propose a data flow embedding technique to enhance the performance of pre-trained models in vulnerability detection tasks. Specifically, we parse data flow graphs from function-level source code, and use the data type of the variable as the node characteristics of the DFG. Our research shows that DFEPT can provide effective vulnerability semantic information to pre-trained models, achieving an accuracy of 64.97% on the Devign dataset and an F1-Score of 47.9% on the Reveal dataset.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-24T07:05:07Z)
• A Lean Transformer Model for Dynamic Malware Analysis and Detection [0.0]
  Malware is a fast-growing threat to the modern computing world and existing lines of defense are not efficient enough to address this issue. Previous works have shown some success leveraging Neural Networks and API calls sequences extracted from execution reports. In this paper, we design an emulation-Only model, based on the Transformers architecture, to detect malicious files.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-05T08:46:46Z)
• Security Vulnerability Detection with Multitask Self-Instructed Fine-Tuning of Large Language Models [8.167614500821223]
  We introduce MSIVD, multitask self-instructed fine-tuning for vulnerability detection, inspired by chain-of-thought prompting and LLM self-instruction. Our experiments demonstrate that MSIVD achieves superior performance, outperforming the highest LLM-based vulnerability detector baseline (LineVul) with a F1 score of 0.92 on the BigVul dataset, and 0.48 on the PreciseBugs dataset.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-09T19:18:05Z)
• DLAP: A Deep Learning Augmented Large Language Model Prompting Framework for Software Vulnerability Detection [12.686480870065827]
  This paper contributes textbfDLAP, a framework that combines the best of both deep learning (DL) models and Large Language Models (LLMs) to achieve exceptional vulnerability detection performance. Experiment results confirm that DLAP outperforms state-of-the-art prompting frameworks, including role-based prompts, auxiliary information prompts, chain-of-thought prompts, and in-context learning prompts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-02T11:44:52Z)
• Zero-shot Retrieval: Augmenting Pre-trained Models with Search Engines [83.65380507372483]
  Large pre-trained models can dramatically reduce the amount of task-specific data required to solve a problem, but they often fail to capture domain-specific nuances out of the box. This paper shows how to leverage recent advances in NLP and multi-modal learning to augment a pre-trained model with search engine retrieval.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-29T05:33:28Z)
• Learning to Quantize Vulnerability Patterns and Match to Locate Statement-Level Vulnerabilities [19.6975205650411]
  A vulnerability codebook is learned, which consists of quantized vectors representing various vulnerability patterns. During inference, the codebook is iterated to match all learned patterns and predict the presence of potential vulnerabilities. Our approach was extensively evaluated on a real-world dataset comprising more than 188,000 C/C++ functions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-26T04:13:31Z)
• AI Model Disgorgement: Methods and Choices [127.54319351058167]
  We introduce a taxonomy of possible disgorgement methods that are applicable to modern machine learning systems. We investigate the meaning of "removing the effects" of data in the trained model in a way that does not require retraining from scratch.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-07T08:50:18Z)
• Enhancing Multiple Reliability Measures via Nuisance-extended Information Bottleneck [77.37409441129995]
  In practical scenarios where training data is limited, many predictive signals in the data can be rather from some biases in data acquisition. We consider an adversarial threat model under a mutual information constraint to cover a wider class of perturbations in training. We propose an autoencoder-based training to implement the objective, as well as practical encoder designs to facilitate the proposed hybrid discriminative-generative training.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-24T16:03:21Z)
• CodeLMSec Benchmark: Systematically Evaluating and Finding Security Vulnerabilities in Black-Box Code Language Models [58.27254444280376]
  Large language models (LLMs) for automatic code generation have achieved breakthroughs in several programming tasks. Training data for these models is usually collected from the Internet (e.g., from open-source repositories) and is likely to contain faults and security vulnerabilities. This unsanitized training data can cause the language models to learn these vulnerabilities and propagate them during the code generation procedure.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-08T11:54:07Z)
• Improving robustness of jet tagging algorithms with adversarial training [56.79800815519762]
  We investigate the vulnerability of flavor tagging algorithms via application of adversarial attacks. We present an adversarial training strategy that mitigates the impact of such simulated attacks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-25T19:57:19Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.