The recessionary pressures of generative AI: A threat to wellbeing

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2403.17405v1
• Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2024 05:51:05 GMT
• Title: The recessionary pressures of generative AI: A threat to wellbeing
• Authors: Jo-An Occhipinti, Ante Prodan, William Hynes, Roy Green, Sharan Burrow, Harris A Eyre, Adam Skinner, Goran Ujdur, John Buchanan, Ian B Hickie, Mark Heffernan, Christine Song, Marcel Tanner,
• Abstract summary: Generative Artificial Intelligence (AI) stands as a transformative force that presents a paradox. It offers unprecedented opportunities for productivity growth while potentially posing significant threats to economic stability and societal wellbeing. This paper explores the conditions under which both may be true.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Generative Artificial Intelligence (AI) stands as a transformative force that presents a paradox; it offers unprecedented opportunities for productivity growth while potentially posing significant threats to economic stability and societal wellbeing. Many consider generative AI as akin to previous technological advancements, using historical precedent to argue that fears of widespread job displacement are unfounded, while others contend that generative AI`s unique capacity to undertake non-routine cognitive tasks sets it apart from other forms of automation capital and presents a threat to the quality and availability of work that underpin stable societies. This paper explores the conditions under which both may be true. We posit the existence of an AI-capital-to-labour ratio threshold beyond which a self-reinforcing cycle of recessionary pressures could be triggered, exacerbating social disparities, reducing social cohesion, heightening tensions, and requiring sustained government intervention to maintain stability. To prevent this, the paper underscores the urgent need for proactive policy responses, making recommendations to reduce these risks through robust regulatory frameworks and a new social contract characterised by progressive social and economic policies. This approach aims to ensure a sustainable, inclusive, and resilient economic future where human contribution to the economy is retained and integrated with generative AI to enhance the Mental Wealth of nations.

Related papers

• Hype, Sustainability, and the Price of the Bigger-is-Better Paradigm in AI [67.58673784790375]
  We argue that the 'bigger is better' AI paradigm is not only fragile scientifically, but comes with undesirable consequences. First, it is not sustainable, as its compute demands increase faster than model performance, leading to unreasonable economic requirements and a disproportionate environmental footprint. Second, it implies focusing on certain problems at the expense of others, leaving aside important applications, e.g. health, education, or the climate.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-21T14:43:54Z)
• Economic Policy Challenges for the Age of AI [0.2913760942403036]
  This paper examines the profound challenges that transformative advances in AI towards Artificial General Intelligence (AGI) will pose for economists and economic policymakers. I examine how the Age of AI will revolutionize the basic structure of our economies by diminishing the role of labor, leading to unprecedented productivity gains but raising concerns about job disruption, income distribution, and the value of education and human capital. The paper then identifies eight key challenges for economic policy in the Age of AI: (1) inequality and income distribution, (2) education and skill development, (3) social and political stability, (4) macroeconomic policy, (5) antitrust and market regulation, (6) intellectual property, (7)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-20T02:49:37Z)
• The Dual Imperative: Innovation and Regulation in the AI Era [0.0]
  This article addresses the societal costs associated with the lack of regulation in Artificial Intelligence. Over fifty years of AI research, have propelled AI into the mainstream, promising significant economic benefits. The discourse is polarized between accelerationists, advocating for unfettered technological advancement, and doomers, calling for a slowdown to prevent dystopian outcomes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-23T08:26:25Z)
• Near to Mid-term Risks and Opportunities of Open-Source Generative AI [94.06233419171016]
  Applications of Generative AI are expected to revolutionize a number of different areas, ranging from science & medicine to education. The potential for these seismic changes has triggered a lively debate about potential risks and resulted in calls for tighter regulation. This regulation is likely to put at risk the budding field of open-source Generative AI.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-25T21:14:24Z)
• In the Shadow of Smith`s Invisible Hand: Risks to Economic Stability and Social Wellbeing in the Age of Intelligence [0.0]
  Even a moderate increase in the AI-capital-to-labour ratio could increase labour underutilisation to double its current level. To prevent a reduction in per capita disposable income due to the estimated increase in underutilization, at least a 10.8-fold increase in the new job creation rate would be necessary.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-22T06:16:48Z)
• Exploiting the Margin: How Capitalism Fuels AI at the Expense of Minoritized Groups [0.0]
  This paper explores the relationship between capitalism, racial injustice, and artificial intelligence (AI) It argues that AI acts as a contemporary vehicle for age-old forms of exploitation. The paper promotes an approach that integrates social justice and equity into the core of technological design and policy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-10T22:40:07Z)
• A Safe Harbor for AI Evaluation and Red Teaming [124.89885800509505]
  Some researchers fear that conducting such research or releasing their findings will result in account suspensions or legal reprisal. We propose that major AI developers commit to providing a legal and technical safe harbor. We believe these commitments are a necessary step towards more inclusive and unimpeded community efforts to tackle the risks of generative AI.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-07T20:55:08Z)
• The impact of generative artificial intelligence on socioeconomic inequalities and policy making [1.5156317247732694]
  Generative artificial intelligence has the potential to both exacerbate and ameliorate existing socioeconomic inequalities. Our goal is to highlight how generative AI could worsen existing inequalities while illuminating how AI may help mitigate pervasive social problems. In the information domain, generative AI can democratize content creation and access, but may dramatically expand the production and proliferation of misinformation. In education, it offers personalized learning, but may widen the digital divide. In healthcare, it might improve diagnostics and accessibility, but could deepen pre-existing inequalities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-16T10:37:22Z)
• Managing extreme AI risks amid rapid progress [171.05448842016125]
  We describe risks that include large-scale social harms, malicious uses, and irreversible loss of human control over autonomous AI systems. There is a lack of consensus about how exactly such risks arise, and how to manage them. Present governance initiatives lack the mechanisms and institutions to prevent misuse and recklessness, and barely address autonomous systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-26T17:59:06Z)
• Fairness in AI and Its Long-Term Implications on Society [68.8204255655161]
  We take a closer look at AI fairness and analyze how lack of AI fairness can lead to deepening of biases over time. We discuss how biased models can lead to more negative real-world outcomes for certain groups. If the issues persist, they could be reinforced by interactions with other risks and have severe implications on society in the form of social unrest.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-16T11:22:59Z)
• Fairness in Agreement With European Values: An Interdisciplinary Perspective on AI Regulation [61.77881142275982]
  This interdisciplinary position paper considers various concerns surrounding fairness and discrimination in AI, and discusses how AI regulations address them. We first look at AI and fairness through the lenses of law, (AI) industry, sociotechnology, and (moral) philosophy, and present various perspectives. We identify and propose the roles AI Regulation should take to make the endeavor of the AI Act a success in terms of AI fairness concerns.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-08T12:32:08Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.