A Path Towards Legal Autonomy: An interoperable and explainable approach to extracting, transforming, loading and computing legal information using large language models, expert systems and Bayesian networks
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2403.18537v1
- Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2024 13:12:57 GMT
- Title: A Path Towards Legal Autonomy: An interoperable and explainable approach to extracting, transforming, loading and computing legal information using large language models, expert systems and Bayesian networks
- Authors: Axel Constant, Hannes Westermann, Bryan Wilson, Alex Kiefer, Ines Hipolito, Sylvain Pronovost, Steven Swanson, Mahault Albarracin, Maxwell J. D. Ramstead,
- Abstract summary: Legal autonomy can be achieved either by imposing constraints on AI actors such as developers, deployers and users, or by imposing constraints on the range and scope of the impact that AI agents can have on the environment.
The latter approach involves encoding extant rules concerning AI driven devices into the software of AI agents controlling those devices.
This is a challenge since the effectivity of such an approach requires a method of extracting, loading, transforming and computing legal information that would be both explainable and legally interoperable.
- Score: 2.2192488799070444
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: Legal autonomy - the lawful activity of artificial intelligence agents - can be achieved in one of two ways. It can be achieved either by imposing constraints on AI actors such as developers, deployers and users, and on AI resources such as data, or by imposing constraints on the range and scope of the impact that AI agents can have on the environment. The latter approach involves encoding extant rules concerning AI driven devices into the software of AI agents controlling those devices (e.g., encoding rules about limitations on zones of operations into the agent software of an autonomous drone device). This is a challenge since the effectivity of such an approach requires a method of extracting, loading, transforming and computing legal information that would be both explainable and legally interoperable, and that would enable AI agents to reason about the law. In this paper, we sketch a proof of principle for such a method using large language models (LLMs), expert legal systems known as legal decision paths, and Bayesian networks. We then show how the proposed method could be applied to extant regulation in matters of autonomous cars, such as the California Vehicle Code.
Related papers
- Combining AI Control Systems and Human Decision Support via Robustness and Criticality [53.10194953873209]
We extend a methodology for adversarial explanations (AE) to state-of-the-art reinforcement learning frameworks.
We show that the learned AI control system demonstrates robustness against adversarial tampering.
In a training / learning framework, this technology can improve both the AI's decisions and explanations through human interaction.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-07-03T15:38:57Z) - AI Cards: Towards an Applied Framework for Machine-Readable AI and Risk Documentation Inspired by the EU AI Act [2.1897070577406734]
Despite its importance, there is a lack of standards and guidelines to assist with drawing up AI and risk documentation aligned with the AI Act.
We propose AI Cards as a novel holistic framework for representing a given intended use of an AI system.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-26T09:51:49Z) - Work-in-Progress: Crash Course: Can (Under Attack) Autonomous Driving Beat Human Drivers? [60.51287814584477]
This paper evaluates the inherent risks in autonomous driving by examining the current landscape of AVs.
We develop specific claims highlighting the delicate balance between the advantages of AVs and potential security challenges in real-world scenarios.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-05-14T09:42:21Z) - Software Engineering Methods For AI-Driven Deductive Legal Reasoning [2.95701410483693]
We show how principled software engineering techniques can enhance AI-driven legal reasoning of complex statutes.
We show how it is possible to apply principled software engineering techniques to unlock new applications in automated meta-reasoning.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-04-15T15:33:29Z) - The risks of risk-based AI regulation: taking liability seriously [46.90451304069951]
The development and regulation of AI seems to have reached a critical stage.
Some experts are calling for a moratorium on the training of AI systems more powerful than GPT-4.
This paper analyses the most advanced legal proposal, the European Union's AI Act.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-11-03T12:51:37Z) - A Case for AI Safety via Law [0.0]
How to make artificial intelligence (AI) systems safe and aligned with human values is an open research question.
Proposed solutions tend toward relying on human intervention in uncertain situations.
This paper makes a case that effective legal systems are the best way to address AI safety.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-07-31T19:55:27Z) - When Authentication Is Not Enough: On the Security of Behavioral-Based Driver Authentication Systems [53.2306792009435]
We develop two lightweight driver authentication systems based on Random Forest and Recurrent Neural Network architectures.
We are the first to propose attacks against these systems by developing two novel evasion attacks, SMARTCAN and GANCAN.
Through our contributions, we aid practitioners in safely adopting these systems, help reduce car thefts, and enhance driver security.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-06-09T14:33:26Z) - Cybertrust: From Explainable to Actionable and Interpretable AI (AI2) [58.981120701284816]
Actionable and Interpretable AI (AI2) will incorporate explicit quantifications and visualizations of user confidence in AI recommendations.
It will allow examining and testing of AI system predictions to establish a basis for trust in the systems' decision making.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-01-26T18:53:09Z) - Automating Privilege Escalation with Deep Reinforcement Learning [71.87228372303453]
In this work, we exemplify the potential threat of malicious actors using deep reinforcement learning to train automated agents.
We present an agent that uses a state-of-the-art reinforcement learning algorithm to perform local privilege escalation.
Our agent is usable for generating realistic attack sensor data for training and evaluating intrusion detection systems.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-10-04T12:20:46Z) - Behavioral Use Licensing for Responsible AI [11.821476868900506]
We advocate the use of licensing to enable legally enforceable behavioral use conditions on software and code.
We envision how licensing may be implemented in accordance with existing responsible AI guidelines.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-11-04T09:23:28Z) - Artificial intelligence in space [2.0299248281970956]
Space activities are expected to undergo a radical transformation with the emergence of new satellite systems or new services.
This chapter identifies some of the legal and ethical challenges linked to its use.
For this reason, a legal methodology must be developed that makes it possible to link intelligent systems and services to a system of rules applicable thereto.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-06-22T16:00:44Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.