Interpreting Key Mechanisms of Factual Recall in Transformer-Based Language Models
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2403.19521v4
- Date: Fri, 24 May 2024 15:06:45 GMT
- Title: Interpreting Key Mechanisms of Factual Recall in Transformer-Based Language Models
- Authors: Ang Lv, Yuhan Chen, Kaiyi Zhang, Yulong Wang, Lifeng Liu, Ji-Rong Wen, Jian Xie, Rui Yan,
- Abstract summary: We study mechanisms employed by Transformer-based language models (LLMs) for factual recall tasks.
We propose a novel analytic method aimed at decomposing the outputs of the outputs into components understandable by humans.
We mitigate this suppression by leveraging our interpretation to improve factual recall confidence.
- Score: 68.83330172211315
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: In this paper, we delve into several mechanisms employed by Transformer-based language models (LLMs) for factual recall tasks. We outline a pipeline consisting of three major steps: (1) Given a prompt ``The capital of France is,'' task-specific attention heads extract the topic token, such as ``France,'' from the context and pass it to subsequent MLPs. (2) As attention heads' outputs are aggregated with equal weight and added to the residual stream, the subsequent MLP acts as an ``activation,'' which either erases or amplifies the information originating from individual heads. As a result, the topic token ``France'' stands out in the residual stream. (3) A deep MLP takes ``France'' and generates a component that redirects the residual stream towards the direction of the correct answer, i.e., ``Paris.'' This procedure is akin to applying an implicit function such as ``get\_capital($X$),'' and the argument $X$ is the topic token information passed by attention heads. To achieve the above quantitative and qualitative analysis for MLPs, we proposed a novel analytic method aimed at decomposing the outputs of the MLP into components understandable by humans. Additionally, we observed a universal anti-overconfidence mechanism in the final layer of models, which suppresses correct predictions. We mitigate this suppression by leveraging our interpretation to improve factual recall confidence. The above interpretations are evaluated across diverse tasks spanning various domains of factual knowledge, using various language models from the GPT-2 families, 1.3B OPT, up to 7B Llama-2, and in both zero- and few-shot setups.
Related papers
- The Probabilities Also Matter: A More Faithful Metric for Faithfulness of Free-Text Explanations in Large Language Models [24.144513068228903]
We introduce Correlational Explanatory Faithfulness (CEF), a metric that can be used in faithfulness tests based on input interventions.
Our metric accounts for the total shift in the model's predicted label distribution.
We then introduce the Correlational Counterfactual Test (CCT) by instantiating CEF on the Counterfactual Test.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-04-04T04:20:04Z) - Linguistic-Based Mild Cognitive Impairment Detection Using Informative
Loss [2.8893654860442872]
We propose a framework that analyzes transcripts generated from video interviews collected within the I-CONECT study project.
Our framework can distinguish between MCI and NC with an average area under the curve of 84.75%.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-01-23T16:30:22Z) - Pushing the Limits of ChatGPT on NLP Tasks [79.17291002710517]
Despite the success of ChatGPT, its performances on most NLP tasks are still well below the supervised baselines.
In this work, we looked into the causes, and discovered that its subpar performance was caused by the following factors.
We propose a collection of general modules to address these issues, in an attempt to push the limits of ChatGPT on NLP tasks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-06-16T09:40:05Z) - Multi-resolution Interpretation and Diagnostics Tool for Natural
Language Classifiers [0.0]
This paper aims to create more flexible model explainability summaries by segments of observation or clusters of words that are semantically related to each other.
In addition, we introduce a root cause analysis method for NLP models, by analyzing representative False Positive and False Negative examples from different segments.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-03-06T22:59:02Z) - SpArX: Sparse Argumentative Explanations for Neural Networks [Technical
Report] [14.787292425343527]
We exploit relationships between multi-layer perceptrons (MLPs) and quantitative argumentation frameworks (QAFs) to create argumentative explanations for the mechanics of neural networks (NNs)
Our SpArX method first sparsifies the sparse while maintaining as much of the original structure as possible. It then translates, producing global and/or local explanations.
We demonstrate experimentally that SpArX can give more faithful explanations than existing approaches, while simultaneously providing deeper insights into the actual reasoning process of neural networks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-01-23T17:20:25Z) - Efficient Language Modeling with Sparse all-MLP [53.81435968051093]
All-MLPs can match Transformers in language modeling, but still lag behind in downstream tasks.
We propose sparse all-MLPs with mixture-of-experts (MoEs) in both feature and input (tokens)
We evaluate its zero-shot in-context learning performance on six downstream tasks, and find that it surpasses Transformer-based MoEs and dense Transformers.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-03-14T04:32:19Z) - Bayesian Transformer Language Models for Speech Recognition [59.235405107295655]
State-of-the-art neural language models (LMs) represented by Transformers are highly complex.
This paper proposes a full Bayesian learning framework for Transformer LM estimation.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-02-09T10:55:27Z) - Is Supervised Syntactic Parsing Beneficial for Language Understanding?
An Empirical Investigation [71.70562795158625]
Traditional NLP has long held (supervised) syntactic parsing necessary for successful higher-level semantic language understanding (LU)
Recent advent of end-to-end neural models, self-supervised via language modeling (LM), and their success on a wide range of LU tasks, questions this belief.
We empirically investigate the usefulness of supervised parsing for semantic LU in the context of LM-pretrained transformer networks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-08-15T21:03:36Z) - Trojaning Language Models for Fun and Profit [53.45727748224679]
TROJAN-LM is a new class of trojaning attacks in which maliciously crafted LMs trigger host NLP systems to malfunction.
By empirically studying three state-of-the-art LMs in a range of security-critical NLP tasks, we demonstrate that TROJAN-LM possesses the following properties.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-08-01T18:22:38Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.