Survey of Computerized Adaptive Testing: A Machine Learning Perspective

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2404.00712v2
• Date: Fri, 5 Apr 2024 02:18:29 GMT
• Title: Survey of Computerized Adaptive Testing: A Machine Learning Perspective
• Authors: Qi Liu, Yan Zhuang, Haoyang Bi, Zhenya Huang, Weizhe Huang, Jiatong Li, Junhao Yu, Zirui Liu, Zirui Hu, Yuting Hong, Zachary A. Pardos, Haiping Ma, Mengxiao Zhu, Shijin Wang, Enhong Chen,
• Abstract summary: Computerized Adaptive Testing (CAT) provides an efficient and tailored method for assessing the proficiency of examinees. This paper aims to provide a machine learning-focused survey on CAT, presenting a fresh perspective on this adaptive testing method.
• Score: 66.26687542572974
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Computerized Adaptive Testing (CAT) provides an efficient and tailored method for assessing the proficiency of examinees, by dynamically adjusting test questions based on their performance. Widely adopted across diverse fields like education, healthcare, sports, and sociology, CAT has revolutionized testing practices. While traditional methods rely on psychometrics and statistics, the increasing complexity of large-scale testing has spurred the integration of machine learning techniques. This paper aims to provide a machine learning-focused survey on CAT, presenting a fresh perspective on this adaptive testing method. By examining the test question selection algorithm at the heart of CAT's adaptivity, we shed light on its functionality. Furthermore, we delve into cognitive diagnosis models, question bank construction, and test control within CAT, exploring how machine learning can optimize these components. Through an analysis of current methods, strengths, limitations, and challenges, we strive to develop robust, fair, and efficient CAT systems. By bridging psychometric-driven CAT research with machine learning, this survey advocates for a more inclusive and interdisciplinary approach to the future of adaptive testing.

Related papers

• A Survey of Models for Cognitive Diagnosis: New Developments and Future Directions [66.40362209055023]
  This paper aims to provide a survey of current models for cognitive diagnosis, with more attention on new developments using machine learning-based methods. By comparing the model structures, parameter estimation algorithms, model evaluation methods and applications, we provide a relatively comprehensive review of the recent trends in cognitive diagnosis models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-07T18:02:00Z)
• From Static Benchmarks to Adaptive Testing: Psychometrics in AI Evaluation [60.14902811624433]
  We discuss a paradigm shift from static evaluation methods to adaptive testing. This involves estimating the characteristics and value of each test item in the benchmark and dynamically adjusting items in real-time. We analyze the current approaches, advantages, and underlying reasons for adopting psychometrics in AI evaluation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-18T09:54:33Z)
• Balancing Test Accuracy and Security in Computerized Adaptive Testing [18.121437613260618]
  Bilevel optimization-based CAT (BOBCAT) is a framework that learns a data-driven question selection algorithm. It suffers from high question exposure and test overlap rates, which potentially affects test security. We show that C-BOBCAT is effective through extensive experiments on two real-world adult testing datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-18T18:32:51Z)
• A Comprehensive Survey on Test-Time Adaptation under Distribution Shifts [143.14128737978342]
  Test-time adaptation, an emerging paradigm, has the potential to adapt a pre-trained model to unlabeled data during testing, before making predictions. Recent progress in this paradigm highlights the significant benefits of utilizing unlabeled data for training self-adapted models prior to inference.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-27T16:32:21Z)
• DLTTA: Dynamic Learning Rate for Test-time Adaptation on Cross-domain Medical Images [56.72015587067494]
  We propose a novel dynamic learning rate adjustment method for test-time adaptation, called DLTTA. Our method achieves effective and fast test-time adaptation with consistent performance improvement over current state-of-the-art test-time adaptation methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-27T02:34:32Z)
• Discovering Boundary Values of Feature-based Machine Learning Classifiers through Exploratory Datamorphic Testing [7.8729820663730035]
  This paper proposes a set of testing strategies for testing machine learning applications in the framework of the datamorphism testing methodology. Three variants of exploratory strategies are presented with the algorithms implemented in the automated datamorphic testing tool Morphy. Their capability and cost of discovering borders between classes are evaluated via a set of controlled experiments with manually designed subjects and a set of case studies with real machine learning models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-01T11:47:56Z)
• BOBCAT: Bilevel Optimization-Based Computerized Adaptive Testing [3.756550107432323]
  Computerized adaptive testing (CAT) refers to a form of tests that are personalized to every student/test taker. We propose BOBCAT, a Bilevel Optimization-Based framework for CAT to directly learn a data-driven question selection algorithm from training data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-08-17T00:40:23Z)
• Quality meets Diversity: A Model-Agnostic Framework for Computerized Adaptive Testing [60.38182654847399]
  Computerized Adaptive Testing (CAT) is emerging as a promising testing application in many scenarios. We propose a novel framework, namely Model-Agnostic Adaptive Testing (MAAT) for CAT solution.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-01-15T06:48:50Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.