Advancing AI with Integrity: Ethical Challenges and Solutions in Neural Machine Translation
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2404.01070v1
- Date: Mon, 1 Apr 2024 12:03:35 GMT
- Title: Advancing AI with Integrity: Ethical Challenges and Solutions in Neural Machine Translation
- Authors: Richard Kimera, Yun-Seon Kim, Heeyoul Choi,
- Abstract summary: This paper addresses the ethical challenges of Artificial Intelligence in Neural Machine Translation (NMT) systems.
We investigate the ethical competence of AI models in NMT, including data handling, privacy, data ownership, and consent.
We discuss the societal impact of NMT and the broader ethical responsibilities of developers, positing them as stewards accountable for the societal repercussions of their creations.
- Score: 0.0
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: This paper addresses the ethical challenges of Artificial Intelligence in Neural Machine Translation (NMT) systems, emphasizing the imperative for developers to ensure fairness and cultural sensitivity. We investigate the ethical competence of AI models in NMT, examining the Ethical considerations at each stage of NMT development, including data handling, privacy, data ownership, and consent. We identify and address ethical issues through empirical studies. These include employing Transformer models for Luganda-English translations and enhancing efficiency with sentence mini-batching. And complementary studies that refine data labeling techniques and fine-tune BERT and Longformer models for analyzing Luganda and English social media content. Our second approach is a literature review from databases such as Google Scholar and platforms like GitHub. Additionally, the paper probes the distribution of responsibility between AI systems and humans, underscoring the essential role of human oversight in upholding NMT ethical standards. Incorporating a biblical perspective, we discuss the societal impact of NMT and the broader ethical responsibilities of developers, positing them as stewards accountable for the societal repercussions of their creations.
Related papers
- Eagle: Ethical Dataset Given from Real Interactions [74.7319697510621]
We create datasets extracted from real interactions between ChatGPT and users that exhibit social biases, toxicity, and immoral problems.
Our experiments show that Eagle captures complementary aspects, not covered by existing datasets proposed for evaluation and mitigation of such ethical challenges.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-22T03:46:02Z) - Can AI Serve as a Substitute for Human Subjects in Software Engineering
Research? [24.39463126056733]
This vision paper proposes a novel approach to qualitative data collection in software engineering research by harnessing the capabilities of artificial intelligence (AI)
We explore the potential of AI-generated synthetic text as an alternative source of qualitative data.
We discuss the prospective development of new foundation models aimed at emulating human behavior in observational studies and user evaluations.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-11-18T14:05:52Z) - Unpacking the Ethical Value Alignment in Big Models [46.560886177083084]
This paper provides an overview of the risks and challenges associated with big models, surveys existing AI ethics guidelines, and examines the ethical implications arising from the limitations of these models.
We introduce a novel conceptual paradigm for aligning the ethical values of big models and discuss promising research directions for alignment criteria, evaluation, and method.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-26T16:45:40Z) - Exploration with Principles for Diverse AI Supervision [88.61687950039662]
Training large transformers using next-token prediction has given rise to groundbreaking advancements in AI.
While this generative AI approach has produced impressive results, it heavily leans on human supervision.
This strong reliance on human oversight poses a significant hurdle to the advancement of AI innovation.
We propose a novel paradigm termed Exploratory AI (EAI) aimed at autonomously generating high-quality training data.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-13T07:03:39Z) - STREAM: Social data and knowledge collective intelligence platform for
TRaining Ethical AI Models [10.356779168071313]
TRaining Ethical AI Models (STREAM) is a collective intelligence platform for aligning AI models with human moral values.
Streaming provides ethics datasets and knowledge bases to help promote AI models "follow good advice as naturally as a stream follows its course"
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-09T09:40:11Z) - On the meaning of uncertainty for ethical AI: philosophy and practice [10.591284030838146]
We argue that this is a significant way to bring ethical considerations into mathematical reasoning.
We demonstrate these ideas within the context of competing models used to advise the UK government on the spread of the Omicron variant of COVID-19 during December 2021.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-09-11T15:13:36Z) - The ethical ambiguity of AI data enrichment: Measuring gaps in research
ethics norms and practices [2.28438857884398]
This study explores how, and to what extent, comparable research ethics requirements and norms have developed for AI research and data enrichment.
Leading AI venues have begun to establish protocols for human data collection, but these are are inconsistently followed by authors.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-06-01T16:12:55Z) - The Role of AI in Drug Discovery: Challenges, Opportunities, and
Strategies [97.5153823429076]
The benefits, challenges and drawbacks of AI in this field are reviewed.
The use of data augmentation, explainable AI, and the integration of AI with traditional experimental methods are also discussed.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-12-08T23:23:39Z) - DIME: Fine-grained Interpretations of Multimodal Models via Disentangled
Local Explanations [119.1953397679783]
We focus on advancing the state-of-the-art in interpreting multimodal models.
Our proposed approach, DIME, enables accurate and fine-grained analysis of multimodal models.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-03-03T20:52:47Z) - Descriptive AI Ethics: Collecting and Understanding the Public Opinion [10.26464021472619]
This work proposes a mixed AI ethics model that allows normative and descriptive research to complement each other.
We discuss its implications on bridging the gap between optimistic and pessimistic views towards AI systems' deployment.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-01-15T03:46:27Z) - Aligning AI With Shared Human Values [85.2824609130584]
We introduce the ETHICS dataset, a new benchmark that spans concepts in justice, well-being, duties, virtues, and commonsense morality.
We find that current language models have a promising but incomplete ability to predict basic human ethical judgements.
Our work shows that progress can be made on machine ethics today, and it provides a steppingstone toward AI that is aligned with human values.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-08-05T17:59:16Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.