GLEMOS: Benchmark for Instantaneous Graph Learning Model Selection

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2404.01578v1
• Date: Tue, 2 Apr 2024 02:13:00 GMT
• Title: GLEMOS: Benchmark for Instantaneous Graph Learning Model Selection
• Authors: Namyong Park, Ryan Rossi, Xing Wang, Antoine Simoulin, Nesreen Ahmed, Christos Faloutsos,
• Abstract summary: GLEMOS is a benchmark for instantaneous graph learning (GL) model selection. It provides benchmark data for fundamental GL tasks, including link prediction and node classification. It is designed to be easily extended with new models, new graphs, and new performance records.
• Score: 21.59275856238877
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: The choice of a graph learning (GL) model (i.e., a GL algorithm and its hyperparameter settings) has a significant impact on the performance of downstream tasks. However, selecting the right GL model becomes increasingly difficult and time consuming as more and more GL models are developed. Accordingly, it is of great significance and practical value to equip users of GL with the ability to perform a near-instantaneous selection of an effective GL model without manual intervention. Despite the recent attempts to tackle this important problem, there has been no comprehensive benchmark environment to evaluate the performance of GL model selection methods. To bridge this gap, we present GLEMOS in this work, a comprehensive benchmark for instantaneous GL model selection that makes the following contributions. (i) GLEMOS provides extensive benchmark data for fundamental GL tasks, i.e., link prediction and node classification, including the performances of 366 models on 457 graphs on these tasks. (ii) GLEMOS designs multiple evaluation settings, and assesses how effectively representative model selection techniques perform in these different settings. (iii) GLEMOS is designed to be easily extended with new models, new graphs, and new performance records. (iv) Based on the experimental results, we discuss the limitations of existing approaches and highlight future research directions. To promote research on this significant problem, we make the benchmark data and code publicly available at https://github.com/facebookresearch/glemos.

Related papers

• Exploring Graph Tasks with Pure LLMs: A Comprehensive Benchmark and Investigation [26.19182768810174]
  Graph-structured data has become increasingly prevalent across various domains, raising the demand for effective models to handle graph tasks. Traditional graph learning models like Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) have made significant strides, but their capabilities in handling graph data remain limited in certain contexts. In recent years, large language models (LLMs) have emerged as promising candidates for graph tasks, yet most studies focus primarily on performance benchmarks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-26T03:03:46Z)
• How Do Large Language Models Understand Graph Patterns? A Benchmark for Graph Pattern Comprehension [53.6373473053431]
  This work introduces a benchmark to assess large language models' capabilities in graph pattern tasks. We have developed a benchmark that evaluates whether LLMs can understand graph patterns based on either terminological or topological descriptions. Our benchmark encompasses both synthetic and real datasets, and a variety of models, with a total of 11 tasks and 7 models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-04T04:48:33Z)
• Can Large Language Models Analyze Graphs like Professionals? A Benchmark, Datasets and Models [90.98855064914379]
  We introduce ProGraph, a benchmark for large language models (LLMs) to process graphs. Our findings reveal that the performance of current LLMs is unsatisfactory, with the best model achieving only 36% accuracy. We propose LLM4Graph datasets, which include crawled documents and auto-generated codes based on 6 widely used graph libraries.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-29T11:38:45Z)
• Enabling Small Models for Zero-Shot Classification through Model Label Learning [50.68074833512999]
  We introduce a novel paradigm, Model Label Learning (MLL), which bridges the gap between models and their functionalities. Experiments on seven real-world datasets validate the effectiveness and efficiency of MLL.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-21T09:08:26Z)
• GLBench: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Graph with Large Language Models [41.89444363336435]
  We introduce GLBench, the first comprehensive benchmark for evaluating GraphLLM methods in both supervised and zero-shot scenarios. GLBench provides a fair and thorough evaluation of different categories of GraphLLM methods, along with traditional baselines such as graph neural networks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-10T08:20:47Z)
• GLiNER multi-task: Generalist Lightweight Model for Various Information Extraction Tasks [0.0]
  We will introduce a new kind of GLiNER model that can be used for various information extraction tasks while being a small encoder model. Our model achieved SoTA performance on zero-shot NER benchmarks and leading performance on question-answering, summarization and relation extraction tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-14T13:54:29Z)
• GraphFM: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Graph Foundation Model [33.157367455390144]
  Foundation Models (FMs) serve as a general class for the development of artificial intelligence systems. Despite extensive research into self-supervised learning as the cornerstone of FMs, several outstanding issues persist. The extent of generalization capability on downstream tasks remains unclear. It is unknown how effectively these models can scale to large datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-12T15:10:44Z)
• Challenging the Myth of Graph Collaborative Filtering: a Reasoned and Reproducibility-driven Analysis [50.972595036856035]
  We present a code that successfully replicates results from six popular and recent graph recommendation models. We compare these graph models with traditional collaborative filtering models that historically performed well in offline evaluations. By investigating the information flow from users' neighborhoods, we aim to identify which models are influenced by intrinsic features in the dataset structure.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-01T09:31:44Z)
• Adaptive Fine-Grained Predicates Learning for Scene Graph Generation [122.4588401267544]
  General Scene Graph Generation (SGG) models tend to predict head predicates and re-balancing strategies prefer tail categories. We propose an Adaptive Fine-Grained Predicates Learning (FGPL-A) which aims at differentiating hard-to-distinguish predicates for SGG. Our proposed model-agnostic strategy significantly boosts performance of benchmark models on VG-SGG and GQA-SGG datasets by up to 175% and 76% on Mean Recall@100, achieving new state-of-the-art performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-07-11T03:37:57Z)
• Interpretable Learning-to-Rank with Generalized Additive Models [78.42800966500374]
  Interpretability of learning-to-rank models is a crucial yet relatively under-examined research area. Recent progress on interpretable ranking models largely focuses on generating post-hoc explanations for existing black-box ranking models. We lay the groundwork for intrinsically interpretable learning-to-rank by introducing generalized additive models (GAMs) into ranking tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-05-06T01:51:30Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.