Explaining Explainability: Understanding Concept Activation Vectors
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2404.03713v1
- Date: Thu, 4 Apr 2024 17:46:20 GMT
- Title: Explaining Explainability: Understanding Concept Activation Vectors
- Authors: Angus Nicolson, Lisa Schut, J. Alison Noble, Yarin Gal,
- Abstract summary: Recent interpretability methods propose using concept-based explanations to translate internal representations of deep learning models into a language that humans are familiar with: concepts.
This requires understanding which concepts are present in the representation space of a neural network.
In this work, we investigate three properties of Concept Activation Vectors (CAVs), which are learnt using a probe dataset of concept exemplars.
We introduce tools designed to detect the presence of these properties, provide insight into how they affect the derived explanations, and provide recommendations to minimise their impact.
- Score: 35.37586279472797
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: Recent interpretability methods propose using concept-based explanations to translate the internal representations of deep learning models into a language that humans are familiar with: concepts. This requires understanding which concepts are present in the representation space of a neural network. One popular method for finding concepts is Concept Activation Vectors (CAVs), which are learnt using a probe dataset of concept exemplars. In this work, we investigate three properties of CAVs. CAVs may be: (1) inconsistent between layers, (2) entangled with different concepts, and (3) spatially dependent. Each property provides both challenges and opportunities in interpreting models. We introduce tools designed to detect the presence of these properties, provide insight into how they affect the derived explanations, and provide recommendations to minimise their impact. Understanding these properties can be used to our advantage. For example, we introduce spatially dependent CAVs to test if a model is translation invariant with respect to a specific concept and class. Our experiments are performed on ImageNet and a new synthetic dataset, Elements. Elements is designed to capture a known ground truth relationship between concepts and classes. We release this dataset to facilitate further research in understanding and evaluating interpretability methods.
Related papers
- CoLiDR: Concept Learning using Aggregated Disentangled Representations [29.932706137805713]
Interpretability of Deep Neural Networks using concept-based models offers a promising way to explain model behavior through human-understandable concepts.
A parallel line of research focuses on disentangling the data distribution into its underlying generative factors, in turn explaining the data generation process.
While both directions have received extensive attention, little work has been done on explaining concepts in terms of generative factors to unify mathematically disentangled representations and human-understandable concepts.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-07-27T16:55:14Z) - Knowledge graphs for empirical concept retrieval [1.06378109904813]
Concept-based explainable AI is promising as a tool to improve the understanding of complex models at the premises of a given user.
Here, we present a workflow for user-driven data collection in both text and image domains.
We test the retrieved concept datasets on two concept-based explainability methods, namely concept activation vectors (CAVs) and concept activation regions (CARs)
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-04-10T13:47:22Z) - A Recursive Bateson-Inspired Model for the Generation of Semantic Formal
Concepts from Spatial Sensory Data [77.34726150561087]
This paper presents a new symbolic-only method for the generation of hierarchical concept structures from complex sensory data.
The approach is based on Bateson's notion of difference as the key to the genesis of an idea or a concept.
The model is able to produce fairly rich yet human-readable conceptual representations without training.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-07-16T15:59:13Z) - Concept Gradient: Concept-based Interpretation Without Linear Assumption [77.96338722483226]
Concept Activation Vector (CAV) relies on learning a linear relation between some latent representation of a given model and concepts.
We proposed Concept Gradient (CG), extending concept-based interpretation beyond linear concept functions.
We demonstrated CG outperforms CAV in both toy examples and real world datasets.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-08-31T17:06:46Z) - Overlooked factors in concept-based explanations: Dataset choice,
concept learnability, and human capability [25.545486537295144]
Concept-based interpretability methods aim to explain deep neural network model predictions using a predefined set of semantic concepts.
Despite their popularity, they suffer from limitations that are not well-understood and articulated by the literature.
We analyze three commonly overlooked factors in concept-based explanations.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-07-20T01:59:39Z) - Human-Centered Concept Explanations for Neural Networks [47.71169918421306]
We introduce concept explanations including the class of Concept Activation Vectors (CAV)
We then discuss approaches to automatically extract concepts, and approaches to address some of their caveats.
Finally, we discuss some case studies that showcase the utility of such concept-based explanations in synthetic settings and real world applications.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-02-25T01:27:31Z) - Discovering Concepts in Learned Representations using Statistical
Inference and Interactive Visualization [0.76146285961466]
Concept discovery is important for bridging the gap between non-deep learning experts and model end-users.
Current approaches include hand-crafting concept datasets and then converting them to latent space directions.
In this study, we offer another two approaches to guide user discovery of meaningful concepts, one based on multiple hypothesis testing, and another on interactive visualization.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-02-09T22:29:48Z) - Translational Concept Embedding for Generalized Compositional Zero-shot
Learning [73.60639796305415]
Generalized compositional zero-shot learning means to learn composed concepts of attribute-object pairs in a zero-shot fashion.
This paper introduces a new approach, termed translational concept embedding, to solve these two difficulties in a unified framework.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-12-20T21:27:51Z) - A Minimalist Dataset for Systematic Generalization of Perception,
Syntax, and Semantics [131.93113552146195]
We present a new dataset, Handwritten arithmetic with INTegers (HINT), to examine machines' capability of learning generalizable concepts.
In HINT, machines are tasked with learning how concepts are perceived from raw signals such as images.
We undertake extensive experiments with various sequence-to-sequence models, including RNNs, Transformers, and GPT-3.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-03-02T01:32:54Z) - Contrastive Explanations for Model Interpretability [77.92370750072831]
We propose a methodology to produce contrastive explanations for classification models.
Our method is based on projecting model representation to a latent space.
Our findings shed light on the ability of label-contrastive explanations to provide a more accurate and finer-grained interpretability of a model's decision.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-03-02T00:36:45Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.