Learning Social Fairness Preferences from Non-Expert Stakeholder Opinions in Kidney Placement

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2404.03800v1
• Date: Thu, 4 Apr 2024 20:44:56 GMT
• Title: Learning Social Fairness Preferences from Non-Expert Stakeholder Opinions in Kidney Placement
• Authors: Mukund Telukunta, Sukruth Rao, Gabriella Stickney, Venkata Sriram Siddardh Nadendla, Casey Canfield,
• Abstract summary: Modern kidney placement incorporates several intelligent recommendation systems which exhibit social discrimination due to biases inherited from training data. This paper designs a novel fairness feedback survey to evaluate an acceptance rate predictor (ARP) that predicts a kidney's acceptance rate in a given kidney-match pair. A novel social fairness preference learning algorithm is proposed based on minimizing social feedback regret computed using a novel logit-based fairness feedback model.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Modern kidney placement incorporates several intelligent recommendation systems which exhibit social discrimination due to biases inherited from training data. Although initial attempts were made in the literature to study algorithmic fairness in kidney placement, these methods replace true outcomes with surgeons' decisions due to the long delays involved in recording such outcomes reliably. However, the replacement of true outcomes with surgeons' decisions disregards expert stakeholders' biases as well as social opinions of other stakeholders who do not possess medical expertise. This paper alleviates the latter concern and designs a novel fairness feedback survey to evaluate an acceptance rate predictor (ARP) that predicts a kidney's acceptance rate in a given kidney-match pair. The survey is launched on Prolific, a crowdsourcing platform, and public opinions are collected from 85 anonymous crowd participants. A novel social fairness preference learning algorithm is proposed based on minimizing social feedback regret computed using a novel logit-based fairness feedback model. The proposed model and learning algorithm are both validated using simulation experiments as well as Prolific data. Public preferences towards group fairness notions in the context of kidney placement have been estimated and discussed in detail. The specific ARP tested in the Prolific survey has been deemed fair by the participants.

Related papers

• Fighting Sampling Bias: A Framework for Training and Evaluating Credit Scoring Models [2.918530881730374]
  This paper addresses the adverse effect of sampling bias on model training and evaluation. We propose bias-aware self-learning and a reject inference framework for scorecard evaluation. Our results suggest a profit improvement of about eight percent, when using Bayesian evaluation to decide on acceptance rates.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-17T20:59:54Z)
• Biasing & Debiasing based Approach Towards Fair Knowledge Transfer for Equitable Skin Analysis [16.638722872021095]
  We propose a two-biased teachers' based approach to transfer fair knowledge into the student network. Our approach mitigates biases present in the student network without harming its predictive accuracy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-16T17:02:23Z)
• Penalties and Rewards for Fair Learning in Paired Kidney Exchange Programs [4.963350442999301]
  A kidney exchange program, also called a kidney paired donation program, can be viewed as a repeated, dynamic trading and allocation mechanism. We confirm this hypothesis using a full scale simulation of the Canadian Kidney Paired Donation Program. We find that the most critical factor in determining the performance of a kidney exchange program is not the judicious assignment of positive weights (rewards) to patient-donor pairs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-23T16:25:49Z)
• Improved Policy Evaluation for Randomized Trials of Algorithmic Resource Allocation [54.72195809248172]
  We present a new estimator leveraging our proposed novel concept, that involves retrospective reshuffling of participants across experimental arms at the end of an RCT. We prove theoretically that such an estimator is more accurate than common estimators based on sample means.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-06T05:17:22Z)
• Cross Pairwise Ranking for Unbiased Item Recommendation [57.71258289870123]
  We develop a new learning paradigm named Cross Pairwise Ranking (CPR) CPR achieves unbiased recommendation without knowing the exposure mechanism. We prove in theory that this way offsets the influence of user/item propensity on the learning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-04-26T09:20:27Z)
• Causal Inference Struggles with Agency on Online Platforms [32.81856583026165]
  We conduct four large-scale within-study comparisons on Twitter aimed at assessing the effectiveness of observational studies derived from user self-selection. Our results suggest that observational studies derived from user self-selection are a poor alternative to randomized experimentation on online platforms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-07-19T16:14:00Z)
• Semi-Supervised Variational Reasoning for Medical Dialogue Generation [70.838542865384]
  Two key characteristics are relevant for medical dialogue generation: patient states and physician actions. We propose an end-to-end variational reasoning approach to medical dialogue generation. A physician policy network composed of an action-classifier and two reasoning detectors is proposed for augmented reasoning ability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-13T04:14:35Z)
• Estimating and Improving Fairness with Adversarial Learning [65.99330614802388]
  We propose an adversarial multi-task training strategy to simultaneously mitigate and detect bias in the deep learning-based medical image analysis system. Specifically, we propose to add a discrimination module against bias and a critical module that predicts unfairness within the base classification model. We evaluate our framework on a large-scale public-available skin lesion dataset.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-03-07T03:10:32Z)
• Adapting a Kidney Exchange Algorithm to Align with Human Values [59.395925461012126]
  We provide an end-to-end methodology for estimating weights of individual participant profiles in a kidney exchange. We show how to use these weights in kidney exchange market clearing algorithms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-05-19T21:00:29Z)
• Generalization Bounds and Representation Learning for Estimation of Potential Outcomes and Causal Effects [61.03579766573421]
  We study estimation of individual-level causal effects, such as a single patient's response to alternative medication. We devise representation learning algorithms that minimize our bound, by regularizing the representation's induced treatment group distance. We extend these algorithms to simultaneously learn a weighted representation to further reduce treatment group distances.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-01-21T10:16:33Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.