Biasing & Debiasing based Approach Towards Fair Knowledge Transfer for Equitable Skin Analysis
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2405.10256v1
- Date: Thu, 16 May 2024 17:02:23 GMT
- Title: Biasing & Debiasing based Approach Towards Fair Knowledge Transfer for Equitable Skin Analysis
- Authors: Anshul Pundhir, Balasubramanian Raman, Pravendra Singh,
- Abstract summary: We propose a two-biased teachers' based approach to transfer fair knowledge into the student network.
Our approach mitigates biases present in the student network without harming its predictive accuracy.
- Score: 16.638722872021095
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
- Abstract: Deep learning models, particularly Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs), have demonstrated exceptional performance in diagnosing skin diseases, often outperforming dermatologists. However, they have also unveiled biases linked to specific demographic traits, notably concerning diverse skin tones or gender, prompting concerns regarding fairness and limiting their widespread deployment. Researchers are actively working to ensure fairness in AI-based solutions, but existing methods incur an accuracy loss when striving for fairness. To solve this issue, we propose a `two-biased teachers' (i.e., biased on different sensitive attributes) based approach to transfer fair knowledge into the student network. Our approach mitigates biases present in the student network without harming its predictive accuracy. In fact, in most cases, our approach improves the accuracy of the baseline model. To achieve this goal, we developed a weighted loss function comprising biasing and debiasing loss terms. We surpassed available state-of-the-art approaches to attain fairness and also improved the accuracy at the same time. The proposed approach has been evaluated and validated on two dermatology datasets using standard accuracy and fairness evaluation measures. We will make source code publicly available to foster reproducibility and future research.
Related papers
- Fair Bilevel Neural Network (FairBiNN): On Balancing fairness and accuracy via Stackelberg Equilibrium [0.3350491650545292]
Current methods for mitigating bias often result in information loss and an inadequate balance between accuracy and fairness.
We propose a novel methodology grounded in bilevel optimization principles.
Our deep learning-based approach concurrently optimize for both accuracy and fairness objectives.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-21T18:53:39Z) - Improving Bias in Facial Attribute Classification: A Combined Impact of KL Divergence induced Loss Function and Dual Attention [3.5527561584422465]
Earlier systems often exhibited demographic bias, particularly in gender and racial classification, with lower accuracy for women and individuals with darker skin tones.
This paper presents a method using a dual attention mechanism with a pre-trained Inception-ResNet V1 model, enhanced by KL-divergence regularization and a cross-entropy loss function.
The experimental results show significant improvements in both fairness and classification accuracy, providing promising advances in addressing bias and enhancing the reliability of facial recognition systems.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-15T01:29:09Z) - Enhancing Fairness in Neural Networks Using FairVIC [0.0]
Mitigating bias in automated decision-making systems, specifically deep learning models, is a critical challenge in achieving fairness.
We introduce FairVIC, an innovative approach designed to enhance fairness in neural networks by addressing inherent biases at the training stage.
We observe a significant improvement in fairness across all metrics tested, without compromising the model's accuracy to a detrimental extent.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-04-28T10:10:21Z) - Classes Are Not Equal: An Empirical Study on Image Recognition Fairness [100.36114135663836]
We experimentally demonstrate that classes are not equal and the fairness issue is prevalent for image classification models across various datasets.
Our findings reveal that models tend to exhibit greater prediction biases for classes that are more challenging to recognize.
Data augmentation and representation learning algorithms improve overall performance by promoting fairness to some degree in image classification.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-28T07:54:50Z) - Fast Model Debias with Machine Unlearning [54.32026474971696]
Deep neural networks might behave in a biased manner in many real-world scenarios.
Existing debiasing methods suffer from high costs in bias labeling or model re-training.
We propose a fast model debiasing framework (FMD) which offers an efficient approach to identify, evaluate and remove biases.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-19T08:10:57Z) - Learning for Counterfactual Fairness from Observational Data [62.43249746968616]
Fairness-aware machine learning aims to eliminate biases of learning models against certain subgroups described by certain protected (sensitive) attributes such as race, gender, and age.
A prerequisite for existing methods to achieve counterfactual fairness is the prior human knowledge of the causal model for the data.
In this work, we address the problem of counterfactually fair prediction from observational data without given causal models by proposing a novel framework CLAIRE.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-07-17T04:08:29Z) - FairAdaBN: Mitigating unfairness with adaptive batch normalization and
its application to dermatological disease classification [14.589159162086926]
We propose FairAdaBN, which makes batch normalization adaptive to sensitive attribute.
We propose a new metric, named Fairness-Accuracy Trade-off Efficiency (FATE), to compute normalized fairness improvement over accuracy drop.
Experiments on two dermatological datasets show that our proposed method outperforms other methods on fairness criteria and FATE.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-03-15T02:22:07Z) - Adaptive Fairness Improvement Based on Causality Analysis [5.827653543633839]
Given a discriminating neural network, the problem of fairness improvement is to systematically reduce discrimination without significantly scarifies its performance.
We propose an approach which adaptively chooses the fairness improving method based on causality analysis.
Our approach is effective (i.e., always identify the best fairness improving method) and efficient (i.e., with an average time overhead of 5 minutes)
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-09-15T10:05:31Z) - Pseudo Bias-Balanced Learning for Debiased Chest X-ray Classification [57.53567756716656]
We study the problem of developing debiased chest X-ray diagnosis models without knowing exactly the bias labels.
We propose a novel algorithm, pseudo bias-balanced learning, which first captures and predicts per-sample bias labels.
Our proposed method achieved consistent improvements over other state-of-the-art approaches.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-03-18T11:02:18Z) - Estimating and Improving Fairness with Adversarial Learning [65.99330614802388]
We propose an adversarial multi-task training strategy to simultaneously mitigate and detect bias in the deep learning-based medical image analysis system.
Specifically, we propose to add a discrimination module against bias and a critical module that predicts unfairness within the base classification model.
We evaluate our framework on a large-scale public-available skin lesion dataset.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-03-07T03:10:32Z) - Technical Challenges for Training Fair Neural Networks [62.466658247995404]
We conduct experiments on both facial recognition and automated medical diagnosis datasets using state-of-the-art architectures.
We observe that large models overfit to fairness objectives, and produce a range of unintended and undesirable consequences.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-02-12T20:36:45Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.