What if you have only one copy? Low-depth quantum circuits have no advantage in decision problems!
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2404.05714v1
- Date: Mon, 8 Apr 2024 17:52:03 GMT
- Title: What if you have only one copy? Low-depth quantum circuits have no advantage in decision problems!
- Authors: Nengkun Yu,
- Abstract summary: We show that gleaning insights into specific properties is feasible even with a single-state sample.
Our results apply to quantum states with low circuit complexity, including noise-affected ones.
We reveal no quantum advantage in decision problems involving low-depth quantum circuits.
- Score: 14.322753787990036
- License: http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
- Abstract: The conventional approach to understanding the characteristics of an unknown quantum state involves having numerous identical independent copies of the system in that state. However, we demonstrate that gleaning insights into specific properties is feasible even with a single-state sample. Perhaps surprisingly, the confidence level of our findings increases proportionally with the number of qubits. Our conclusions apply to quantum states with low circuit complexity, including noise-affected ones. Additionally, this extends to learning from a solitary sample of probability distributions. Our results establish a strong lower bound for discriminating quantum states with low complexity. Furthermore, we reveal no quantum advantage in decision problems involving low-depth quantum circuits. Our results can be used to verify NISQ devices.
Related papers
- The multimode conditional quantum Entropy Power Inequality and the squashed entanglement of the extreme multimode bosonic Gaussian channels [53.253900735220796]
Inequality determines the minimum conditional von Neumann entropy of the output of the most general linear mixing of bosonic quantum modes.
Bosonic quantum systems constitute the mathematical model for the electromagnetic radiation in the quantum regime.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-18T13:59:50Z) - Learning marginals suffices! [14.322753787990036]
We investigate the relationship between the sample complexity of learning a quantum state and the circuit complexity of the state.
We show that learning its marginals for the quantum state with low circuit complexity suffices for state tomography.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-03-15T21:09:29Z) - Simple Tests of Quantumness Also Certify Qubits [69.96668065491183]
A test of quantumness is a protocol that allows a classical verifier to certify (only) that a prover is not classical.
We show that tests of quantumness that follow a certain template, which captures recent proposals such as (Kalai et al., 2022) can in fact do much more.
Namely, the same protocols can be used for certifying a qubit, a building-block that stands at the heart of applications such as certifiable randomness and classical delegation of quantum computation.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-03-02T14:18:17Z) - Sufficient statistic and recoverability via Quantum Fisher Information
metrics [12.968826862123922]
We prove that for a large class of quantum Fisher information, a quantum channel is sufficient for a family of quantum states.
We obtain an approximate recovery result in the sense that, if the quantum $chi2$ divergence is approximately preserved by a quantum channel, two states can be recovered.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-02-05T09:02:36Z) - The power of noisy quantum states and the advantage of resource dilution [62.997667081978825]
Entanglement distillation allows to convert noisy quantum states into singlets.
We show that entanglement dilution can increase the resilience of shared quantum states to local noise.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-10-25T17:39:29Z) - Scalable measures of magic resource for quantum computers [0.0]
We introduce efficient measures of magic resource for pure quantum states with a sampling cost independent of the number of qubits.
We show the transition of classically simulable stabilizer states into intractable quantum states on the IonQ quantum computer.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-04-21T12:50:47Z) - Depth-efficient proofs of quantumness [77.34726150561087]
A proof of quantumness is a type of challenge-response protocol in which a classical verifier can efficiently certify quantum advantage of an untrusted prover.
In this paper, we give two proof of quantumness constructions in which the prover need only perform constant-depth quantum circuits.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-07-05T17:45:41Z) - Towards understanding the power of quantum kernels in the NISQ era [79.8341515283403]
We show that the advantage of quantum kernels is vanished for large size datasets, few number of measurements, and large system noise.
Our work provides theoretical guidance of exploring advanced quantum kernels to attain quantum advantages on NISQ devices.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-03-31T02:41:36Z) - Sampling and the complexity of nature [0.0]
I investigate the complexity-theoretic and physical foundations of quantum sampling algorithms.
I shed light on how and under which conditions quantum sampling devices can be tested or verified.
An overarching theme of the thesis is the quantum sign problem which arises due to destructive interference between paths.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-12-14T19:35:27Z) - Quantum noise protects quantum classifiers against adversaries [120.08771960032033]
Noise in quantum information processing is often viewed as a disruptive and difficult-to-avoid feature, especially in near-term quantum technologies.
We show that by taking advantage of depolarisation noise in quantum circuits for classification, a robustness bound against adversaries can be derived.
This is the first quantum protocol that can be used against the most general adversaries.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-03-20T17:56:14Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.