A Large Scale Survey of Motivation in Software Development and Analysis of its Validity

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2404.08303v1
• Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2024 07:51:21 GMT
• Title: A Large Scale Survey of Motivation in Software Development and Analysis of its Validity
• Abstract summary: We identify 11 motivators from the literature and evaluate their relative effect on motivation. Since motivation is an internal subjective feeling, we also analyze the validity of the answers.
• Score: 0.3683202928838613
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Context: Motivation is known to improve performance. In software development in particular, there has been considerable interest in the motivation of contributors to open source. Objective: We identify 11 motivators from the literature (enjoying programming, ownership of code, learning, self use, etc.), and evaluate their relative effect on motivation. Since motivation is an internal subjective feeling, we also analyze the validity of the answers. Method: We conducted a survey with 66 questions on motivation which was completed by 521 developers. Most of the questions used an 11 point scale. We evaluated the validity of the answers validity by comparing related questions, comparing to actual behavior on GitHub, and comparison with the same developer in a follow up survey. Results: Validity problems include moderate correlations between answers to related questions, as well as self promotion and mistakes in the answers. Despite these problems, predictive analysis, investigating how diverse motivators influence the probability of high motivation, provided valuable insights. The correlations between the different motivators are low, implying their independence. High values in all 11 motivators predict increased probability of high motivation. In addition, improvement analysis shows that an increase in most motivators predicts an increase in general motivation.

Related papers

• MultivationBench: A Benchmark for Multimodal Sequential Motivation Reasoning [53.157837009685466]
  Multimodal Large Language Models have sparked significant interest due to their potential for social intelligence.<n>We introduce MultivationBench, a benchmark designed to rigorously evaluate multimodal motivation reasoning within story-driven visual narratives.<n>Results indicate that MultivationBench presents a significant challenge: all tested models struggle to maintain consistent motivation reasoning across sequential contexts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-07-29T04:37:59Z)
• Motivation in Large Language Models [14.984642061188055]
  Motivation is a central driver of human behavior, shaping decisions, goals, and task performance.<n>As large language models (LLMs) become increasingly aligned with human preferences, we ask whether they exhibit something akin to motivation.<n>Our experiments reveal consistent and structured patterns that echo human psychology.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-15T12:30:36Z)
• What Were You Thinking? An LLM-Driven Large-Scale Study of Refactoring Motivations in Open-Source Projects [9.505102962292144]
  We analyze developers activity, leveraging Large Language Models (LLMs) to identify underlying motivations.<n>LLMs matched human judgment in 80% of cases, but aligned with literature-based motivations in only 47%.<n>We conclude that LLMs effectively capture surface-level motivations but struggle with architectural reasoning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-09T13:58:46Z)
• Triangulating LLM Progress through Benchmarks, Games, and Cognitive Tests [89.09172401497213]
  We examine three evaluation paradigms: large question-answering benchmarks, interactive games, and cognitive tests. We compile a suite of targeted tests that measure cognitive abilities deemed essential for effective language use. Our analyses reveal that interactive games are superior to standard benchmarks in discriminating models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-20T08:36:58Z)
• Boosting Self-Efficacy and Performance of Large Language Models via Verbal Efficacy Stimulations [10.209999691197948]
  This paper introduces Verbal Efficacy Stimulations (VES) VES comprises three types of verbal prompts: encouraging, provocative, and critical, addressing six aspects such as helpfulness and competence. The experimental results show that the three types of VES improve the performance of LLMs on most tasks, and the most effective VES varies for different models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-10T16:54:03Z)
• Carrot and Stick: Inducing Self-Motivation with Positive & Negative Feedback [8.894019620224112]
  Self-motivation that drives people to reach their goals has not yet been studied from a computational perspective. We propose CArrot and STICk dataset, consisting of 12,590 sentences with 5 different strategies for enhancing self-motivation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-24T10:55:31Z)
• Can participation in a hackathon impact the motivation of software engineering students? A preliminary case study analysis [3.396911477739876]
  This paper investigates whether hackathons can impact the motivation of Software Engineering (SE) students. Pre-hackathon findings reveal a diverse range of motivations with an overall acceptance, while post-hackathon responses highlight no statistically significant shift in participants' perceptions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-08T00:56:50Z)
• L'origine de l'objectif est-elle importante? Effets motivationnels d'objectifs autod{\'e}finis en production [0.0]
  We focus on a commonly used game element, goal setting, through the lens of self-determination theory and goal-setting theory. One hundred two participants completed a repetitive material-handling task in one of three conditions. Results showed that perceived autonomy (autonomous motivation) and performance were best when goals were self-set. Engagement, however, was equal between self-set and assigned goals.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-04T12:08:39Z)
• Learning Goal-based Movement via Motivational-based Models in Cognitive Mobile Robots [58.720142291102135]
  Humans have needs motivating their behavior according to intensity and context. We also create preferences associated with each action's perceived pleasure, which is susceptible to changes over time. This makes decision-making more complex, requiring learning to balance needs and preferences according to the context.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-20T04:52:24Z)
• EgoTaskQA: Understanding Human Tasks in Egocentric Videos [89.9573084127155]
  EgoTaskQA benchmark provides home for crucial dimensions of task understanding through question-answering on real-world egocentric videos. We meticulously design questions that target the understanding of (1) action dependencies and effects, (2) intents and goals, and (3) agents' beliefs about others. We evaluate state-of-the-art video reasoning models on our benchmark and show their significant gaps between humans in understanding complex goal-oriented egocentric videos.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-08T05:49:05Z)
• Causal Intervention Improves Implicit Sentiment Analysis [67.43379729099121]
  We propose a causal intervention model for Implicit Sentiment Analysis using Instrumental Variable (ISAIV) We first review sentiment analysis from a causal perspective and analyze the confounders existing in this task. Then, we introduce an instrumental variable to eliminate the confounding causal effects, thus extracting the pure causal effect between sentence and sentiment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-08-19T13:17:57Z)
• Knowledge-driven Data Construction for Zero-shot Evaluation in Commonsense Question Answering [80.60605604261416]
  We propose a novel neuro-symbolic framework for zero-shot question answering across commonsense tasks. We vary the set of language models, training regimes, knowledge sources, and data generation strategies, and measure their impact across tasks. We show that, while an individual knowledge graph is better suited for specific tasks, a global knowledge graph brings consistent gains across different tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-11-07T22:52:21Z)
• Intrinsic motivation in virtual assistant interaction for fostering spontaneous interactions [3.420509295457138]
  This study aims to cover intrinsic motivation by taking an affective-engineering approach. A novel motivation model is proposed, in which intrinsic motivation is affected by two factors: expectation of capability and uncertainty. Results of the first experiment showed that high expectation engenders more intrinsically motivated interaction compared with low expectation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-13T14:23:57Z)
• Tracking Emotions: Intrinsic Motivation Grounded on Multi-Level Prediction Error Dynamics [68.8204255655161]
  We discuss how emotions arise when differences between expected and actual rates of progress towards a goal are experienced. We present an intrinsic motivation architecture that generates behaviors towards self-generated and dynamic goals.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-07-29T06:53:13Z)
• Intrinsic Motivation for Encouraging Synergistic Behavior [55.10275467562764]
  We study the role of intrinsic motivation as an exploration bias for reinforcement learning in sparse-reward synergistic tasks. Our key idea is that a good guiding principle for intrinsic motivation in synergistic tasks is to take actions which affect the world in ways that would not be achieved if the agents were acting on their own.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-02-12T19:34:51Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.