Evaluating the Explainability of Attributes and Prototypes for a Medical Classification Model

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2404.09917v1
• Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2024 16:43:24 GMT
• Title: Evaluating the Explainability of Attributes and Prototypes for a Medical Classification Model
• Authors: Luisa Gallée, Catharina Silvia Lisson, Christoph Gerhard Lisson, Daniela Drees, Felix Weig, Daniel Vogele, Meinrad Beer, Michael Götz,
• Abstract summary: We evaluate attribute- and prototype-based explanations with the Proto-Caps model. We can conclude that attribute scores and visual prototypes enhance confidence in the model.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Due to the sensitive nature of medicine, it is particularly important and highly demanded that AI methods are explainable. This need has been recognised and there is great research interest in xAI solutions with medical applications. However, there is a lack of user-centred evaluation regarding the actual impact of the explanations. We evaluate attribute- and prototype-based explanations with the Proto-Caps model. This xAI model reasons the target classification with human-defined visual features of the target object in the form of scores and attribute-specific prototypes. The model thus provides a multimodal explanation that is intuitively understandable to humans thanks to predefined attributes. A user study involving six radiologists shows that the explanations are subjectivly perceived as helpful, as they reflect their decision-making process. The results of the model are considered a second opinion that radiologists can discuss using the model's explanations. However, it was shown that the inclusion and increased magnitude of model explanations objectively can increase confidence in the model's predictions when the model is incorrect. We can conclude that attribute scores and visual prototypes enhance confidence in the model. However, additional development and repeated user studies are needed to tailor the explanation to the respective use case.

Related papers

• Unsupervised Model Diagnosis [49.36194740479798]
  This paper proposes Unsupervised Model Diagnosis (UMO) to produce semantic counterfactual explanations without any user guidance. Our approach identifies and visualizes changes in semantics, and then matches these changes to attributes from wide-ranging text sources.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-08T17:59:03Z)
• CNN-based explanation ensembling for dataset, representation and explanations evaluation [1.1060425537315088]
  We explore the potential of ensembling explanations generated by deep classification models using convolutional model. Through experimentation and analysis, we aim to investigate the implications of combining explanations to uncover a more coherent and reliable patterns of the model's behavior.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-16T08:39:29Z)
• Evaluating the Utility of Model Explanations for Model Development [54.23538543168767]
  We evaluate whether explanations can improve human decision-making in practical scenarios of machine learning model development. To our surprise, we did not find evidence of significant improvement on tasks when users were provided with any of the saliency maps. These findings suggest caution regarding the usefulness and potential for misunderstanding in saliency-based explanations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-10T23:13:23Z)
• Interpretable Medical Image Classification using Prototype Learning and Privileged Information [0.0]
  Interpretability is often an essential requirement in medical imaging. In this work, we investigate whether additional information available during the training process can be used to create an understandable and powerful model. We propose an innovative solution called Proto-Caps that leverages the benefits of capsule networks, prototype learning and the use of privileged information.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-24T11:28:59Z)
• Robust and Interpretable Medical Image Classifiers via Concept Bottleneck Models [49.95603725998561]
  We propose a new paradigm to build robust and interpretable medical image classifiers with natural language concepts. Specifically, we first query clinical concepts from GPT-4, then transform latent image features into explicit concepts with a vision-language model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-04T21:57:09Z)
• Towards Human-Interpretable Prototypes for Visual Assessment of Image Classification Models [9.577509224534323]
  We need models which are interpretable-by-design built on a reasoning process similar to humans. ProtoPNet claims to discover visually meaningful prototypes in an unsupervised way. We find that these prototypes still have a long way ahead towards definite explanations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-22T11:01:22Z)
• Explain, Edit, and Understand: Rethinking User Study Design for Evaluating Model Explanations [97.91630330328815]
  We conduct a crowdsourcing study, where participants interact with deception detection models that have been trained to distinguish between genuine and fake hotel reviews. We observe that for a linear bag-of-words model, participants with access to the feature coefficients during training are able to cause a larger reduction in model confidence in the testing phase when compared to the no-explanation control.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-12-17T18:29:56Z)
• To what extent do human explanations of model behavior align with actual model behavior? [91.67905128825402]
  We investigated the extent to which human-generated explanations of models' inference decisions align with how models actually make these decisions. We defined two alignment metrics that quantify how well natural language human explanations align with model sensitivity to input words. We find that a model's alignment with human explanations is not predicted by the model's accuracy on NLI.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-12-24T17:40:06Z)
• Are Visual Explanations Useful? A Case Study in Model-in-the-Loop Prediction [49.254162397086006]
  We study explanations based on visual saliency in an image-based age prediction task. We find that presenting model predictions improves human accuracy. However, explanations of various kinds fail to significantly alter human accuracy or trust in the model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-07-23T20:39:40Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.