GeoAI Reproducibility and Replicability: a computational and spatial perspective
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2404.10108v2
- Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2024 17:53:08 GMT
- Title: GeoAI Reproducibility and Replicability: a computational and spatial perspective
- Authors: Wenwen Li, Chia-Yu Hsu, Sizhe Wang, Peter Kedron,
- Abstract summary: This paper aims to provide an in-depth analysis of this topic from both computational and spatial perspectives.
We first categorize the major goals for reproducing GeoAI research, namely, validation (repeatability), learning and adapting the method for solving a similar or new problem (reproducibility), and examining the generalizability of the research findings (replicability)
We then discuss the factors that may cause the lack of R&R in GeoAI research, with an emphasis on (1) the selection and use of training data; (2) the uncertainty that resides in the GeoAI model design, training, deployment, and inference processes;
- Score: 3.46924652750064
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: GeoAI has emerged as an exciting interdisciplinary research area that combines spatial theories and data with cutting-edge AI models to address geospatial problems in a novel, data-driven manner. While GeoAI research has flourished in the GIScience literature, its reproducibility and replicability (R&R), fundamental principles that determine the reusability, reliability, and scientific rigor of research findings, have rarely been discussed. This paper aims to provide an in-depth analysis of this topic from both computational and spatial perspectives. We first categorize the major goals for reproducing GeoAI research, namely, validation (repeatability), learning and adapting the method for solving a similar or new problem (reproducibility), and examining the generalizability of the research findings (replicability). Each of these goals requires different levels of understanding of GeoAI, as well as different methods to ensure its success. We then discuss the factors that may cause the lack of R&R in GeoAI research, with an emphasis on (1) the selection and use of training data; (2) the uncertainty that resides in the GeoAI model design, training, deployment, and inference processes; and more importantly (3) the inherent spatial heterogeneity of geospatial data and processes. We use a deep learning-based image analysis task as an example to demonstrate the results' uncertainty and spatial variance caused by different factors. The findings reiterate the importance of knowledge sharing, as well as the generation of a "replicability map" that incorporates spatial autocorrelation and spatial heterogeneity into consideration in quantifying the spatial replicability of GeoAI research.
Related papers
- Geometric Feature Enhanced Knowledge Graph Embedding and Spatial Reasoning [8.561588656662419]
Geospatial Knowledge Graphs (GeoKGs) model geoentities and spatial relationships in an interconnected manner.
Existing methods for mining and reasoning from GeoKGs, such as popular knowledge graph embedding (KGE) techniques, lack geographic awareness.
This study aims to enhance general-purpose KGE by developing new strategies and integrating geometric features of spatial relations.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-24T00:53:48Z) - Self-supervised Learning for Geospatial AI: A Survey [21.504978593542354]
Self-supervised learning (SSL) has attracted increasing attention for its adoption in geospatial data.
This paper conducts a comprehensive and up-to-date survey of SSL techniques applied to or developed for three primary data (geometric) types prevalent in geospatial vector data.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-08-22T05:28:22Z) - Swarm Intelligence in Geo-Localization: A Multi-Agent Large Vision-Language Model Collaborative Framework [51.26566634946208]
We introduce smileGeo, a novel visual geo-localization framework.
By inter-agent communication, smileGeo integrates the inherent knowledge of these agents with additional retrieved information.
Results show that our approach significantly outperforms current state-of-the-art methods.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-08-21T03:31:30Z) - Challenges in data-based geospatial modeling for environmental research
and practice [19.316860936437823]
Data-based geospatial modelling using machine learning (ML) has gained popularity in environmental research.
This survey reviews common nuances in geospatial modelling, such as imbalanced data, spatial autocorrelation, prediction errors, model generalisation, domain specificity, and uncertainty estimation.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-11-18T12:30:49Z) - K2: A Foundation Language Model for Geoscience Knowledge Understanding
and Utilization [105.89544876731942]
Large language models (LLMs) have achieved great success in general domains of natural language processing.
We present the first-ever LLM in geoscience, K2, alongside a suite of resources developed to further promote LLM research within geoscience.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-06-08T09:29:05Z) - GeoGLUE: A GeoGraphic Language Understanding Evaluation Benchmark [56.08664336835741]
We propose a GeoGraphic Language Understanding Evaluation benchmark, named GeoGLUE.
We collect data from open-released geographic resources and introduce six natural language understanding tasks.
We pro vide evaluation experiments and analysis of general baselines, indicating the effectiveness and significance of the GeoGLUE benchmark.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-05-11T03:21:56Z) - Philosophical Foundations of GeoAI: Exploring Sustainability, Diversity,
and Bias in GeoAI and Spatial Data Science [1.0152838128195467]
This chapter presents some of the fundamental assumptions and principles that could form the philosophical foundation of GeoAI and spatial data science.
It highlights themes such as sustainability, bias in training data, diversity in schema knowledge, and the (potential lack of) neutrality of GeoAI systems from a unifying ethical perspective.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-03-27T14:01:22Z) - A General Purpose Neural Architecture for Geospatial Systems [142.43454584836812]
We present a roadmap towards the construction of a general-purpose neural architecture (GPNA) with a geospatial inductive bias.
We envision how such a model may facilitate cooperation between members of the community.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-11-04T09:58:57Z) - Applications of physics-informed scientific machine learning in
subsurface science: A survey [64.0476282000118]
Geosystems are geological formations altered by humans activities such as fossil energy exploration, waste disposal, geologic carbon sequestration, and renewable energy generation.
The responsible use and exploration of geosystems are thus critical to the geosystem governance, which in turn depends on the efficient monitoring, risk assessment, and decision support tools for practical implementation.
Fast advances in machine learning algorithms and novel sensing technologies in recent years have presented new opportunities for the subsurface research community to improve the efficacy and transparency of geosystem governance.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-04-10T13:40:22Z) - A Survey on Spatial and Spatiotemporal Prediction Methods [4.353444564058085]
This paper provides a systematic review on principles and methods in spatialtemporal prediction.
We provide a taxonomy of methods categorized by the key challenge they address.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-12-24T18:17:35Z) - Inter-layer Information Similarity Assessment of Deep Neural Networks
Via Topological Similarity and Persistence Analysis of Data Neighbour
Dynamics [93.4221402881609]
The quantitative analysis of information structure through a deep neural network (DNN) can unveil new insights into the theoretical performance of DNN architectures.
Inspired by both LS and ID strategies for quantitative information structure analysis, we introduce two novel complimentary methods for inter-layer information similarity assessment.
We demonstrate their efficacy in this study by performing analysis on a deep convolutional neural network architecture on image data.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-12-07T15:34:58Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.