White Men Lead, Black Women Help? Benchmarking Language Agency Social Biases in LLMs
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2404.10508v3
- Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2024 07:44:17 GMT
- Title: White Men Lead, Black Women Help? Benchmarking Language Agency Social Biases in LLMs
- Authors: Yixin Wan, Kai-Wei Chang,
- Abstract summary: Language agency is an important aspect of evaluating social biases in texts.
Previous research often relies on string-matching techniques to identify agentic and communal words.
We introduce the novel Language Agency Bias Evaluation benchmark.
- Score: 58.27353205269664
- License: http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
- Abstract: Language agency is an important aspect of evaluating social biases in texts. While several studies approached agency-related bias in human-written language, very limited research has investigated such biases in Large Language Model (LLM)-generated content. In addition, previous research often relies on string-matching techniques to identify agentic and communal words within texts, which fall short of accurately classifying language agency. We introduce the novel Language Agency Bias Evaluation (LABE) benchmark, which comprehensively evaluates biases in LLMs by analyzing agency levels attributed to different demographic groups in model generations. LABE leverages 5,400 template-based prompts, an accurate agency classifier, and corresponding bias metrics to test for gender, racial, and intersectional language agency biases in LLMs on 3 text generation tasks: biographies, professor reviews, and reference letters. To build better and more accurate automated agency classifiers, we also contribute and release the Language Agency Classification (LAC) dataset, consisting of 3,724 agentic and communal sentences. Using LABE, we unveil previously under-explored language agency social biases in 3 recent LLMs: ChatGPT, Llama3, and Mistral. We observe that: (1) For the same text category, LLM generations demonstrate higher levels of gender bias than human-written texts; (2) On most generation tasks, models show remarkably higher levels of intersectional bias than the other bias aspects. Those who are at the intersection of gender and racial minority groups -- such as Black females -- are consistently described by texts with lower levels of agency; (3) Among the 3 LLMs investigated, Llama3 demonstrates greatest overall bias in language agency; (4) Not only does prompt-based mitigation fail to resolve language agency bias in LLMs, but it frequently leads to the exacerbation of biases in generated texts.
Related papers
- Inclusivity in Large Language Models: Personality Traits and Gender Bias in Scientific Abstracts [49.97673761305336]
We evaluate three large language models (LLMs) for their alignment with human narrative styles and potential gender biases.
Our findings indicate that, while these models generally produce text closely resembling human authored content, variations in stylistic features suggest significant gender biases.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-27T19:26:11Z) - (Perhaps) Beyond Human Translation: Harnessing Multi-Agent Collaboration for Translating Ultra-Long Literary Texts [52.18246881218829]
We introduce a novel multi-agent framework based on large language models (LLMs) for literary translation, implemented as a company called TransAgents.
To evaluate the effectiveness of our system, we propose two innovative evaluation strategies: Monolingual Human Preference (MHP) and Bilingual LLM Preference (BLP)
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-05-20T05:55:08Z) - Hire Me or Not? Examining Language Model's Behavior with Occupation Attributes [7.718858707298602]
Large language models (LLMs) have been widely integrated into production pipelines, like recruitment and recommendation systems.
This paper investigates LLMs' behavior with respect to gender stereotypes, in the context of occupation decision making.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-05-06T18:09:32Z) - Gender Bias in Large Language Models across Multiple Languages [10.068466432117113]
We examine gender bias in large language models (LLMs) generated for different languages.
We use three measurements: 1) gender bias in selecting descriptive words given the gender-related context.
2) gender bias in selecting gender-related pronouns (she/he) given the descriptive words.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-03-01T04:47:16Z) - What Do Llamas Really Think? Revealing Preference Biases in Language
Model Representations [62.91799637259657]
Do large language models (LLMs) exhibit sociodemographic biases, even when they decline to respond?
We study this research question by probing contextualized embeddings and exploring whether this bias is encoded in its latent representations.
We propose a logistic Bradley-Terry probe which predicts word pair preferences of LLMs from the words' hidden vectors.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-11-30T18:53:13Z) - Probing Explicit and Implicit Gender Bias through LLM Conditional Text
Generation [64.79319733514266]
Large Language Models (LLMs) can generate biased and toxic responses.
We propose a conditional text generation mechanism without the need for predefined gender phrases and stereotypes.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-11-01T05:31:46Z) - "Kelly is a Warm Person, Joseph is a Role Model": Gender Biases in
LLM-Generated Reference Letters [97.11173801187816]
Large Language Models (LLMs) have recently emerged as an effective tool to assist individuals in writing various types of content.
This paper critically examines gender biases in LLM-generated reference letters.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-13T16:12:57Z) - Investigating Subtler Biases in LLMs: Ageism, Beauty, Institutional, and Nationality Bias in Generative Models [0.0]
This paper investigates bias along less-studied but still consequential, dimensions, such as age and beauty.
We ask whether LLMs hold wide-reaching biases of positive or negative sentiment for specific social groups similar to the "what is beautiful is good" bias found in people in experimental psychology.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-09-16T07:07:04Z) - Queer People are People First: Deconstructing Sexual Identity
Stereotypes in Large Language Models [3.974379576408554]
Large Language Models (LLMs) are trained primarily on minimally processed web text.
LLMs can inadvertently perpetuate stereotypes towards marginalized groups, like the LGBTQIA+ community.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-06-30T19:39:01Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.