FakeBench: Probing Explainable Fake Image Detection via Large Multimodal Models

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2404.13306v2
• Date: Sun, 8 Sep 2024 12:07:52 GMT
• Title: FakeBench: Probing Explainable Fake Image Detection via Large Multimodal Models
• Authors: Yixuan Li, Xuelin Liu, Xiaoyang Wang, Bu Sung Lee, Shiqi Wang, Anderson Rocha, Weisi Lin,
• Abstract summary: We introduce a taxonomy of generative visual forgery concerning human perception, based on which we collect forgery descriptions in human natural language. FakeBench examines LMMs with four evaluation criteria: detection, reasoning, interpretation and fine-grained forgery analysis. This research presents a paradigm shift towards transparency for the fake image detection area.
• Score: 62.66610648697744
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: The ability to distinguish whether an image is generated by artificial intelligence (AI) is a crucial ingredient in human intelligence, usually accompanied by a complex and dialectical forensic and reasoning process. However, current fake image detection models and databases focus on binary classification without understandable explanations for the general populace. This weakens the credibility of authenticity judgment and may conceal potential model biases. Meanwhile, large multimodal models (LMMs) have exhibited immense visual-text capabilities on various tasks, bringing the potential for explainable fake image detection. Therefore, we pioneer the probe of LMMs for explainable fake image detection by presenting a multimodal database encompassing textual authenticity descriptions, the FakeBench. For construction, we first introduce a fine-grained taxonomy of generative visual forgery concerning human perception, based on which we collect forgery descriptions in human natural language with a human-in-the-loop strategy. FakeBench examines LMMs with four evaluation criteria: detection, reasoning, interpretation and fine-grained forgery analysis, to obtain deeper insights into image authenticity-relevant capabilities. Experiments on various LMMs confirm their merits and demerits in different aspects of fake image detection tasks. This research presents a paradigm shift towards transparency for the fake image detection area and reveals the need for greater emphasis on forensic elements in visual-language research and AI risk control. FakeBench will be available at https://github.com/Yixuan423/FakeBench.

Related papers

• ASAP: Interpretable Analysis and Summarization of AI-generated Image Patterns at Scale [20.12991230544801]
  Generative image models have emerged as a promising technology to produce realistic images. There is growing demand to empower users to effectively discern and comprehend patterns of AI-generated images. We develop ASAP, an interactive visualization system that automatically extracts distinct patterns of AI-generated images.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-03T18:20:41Z)
• Unveiling the Truth: Exploring Human Gaze Patterns in Fake Images [34.02058539403381]
  We leverage human semantic knowledge to investigate the possibility of being included in frameworks of fake image detection. A preliminary statistical analysis is conducted to explore the distinctive patterns in how humans perceive genuine and altered images.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-13T19:56:30Z)
• SHIELD : An Evaluation Benchmark for Face Spoofing and Forgery Detection with Multimodal Large Language Models [63.946809247201905]
  We introduce a new benchmark, namely SHIELD, to evaluate the ability of MLLMs on face spoofing and forgery detection. We design true/false and multiple-choice questions to evaluate multimodal face data in these two face security tasks. The results indicate that MLLMs hold substantial potential in the face security domain.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-06T17:31:36Z)
• Common Sense Reasoning for Deepfake Detection [13.502008402754658]
  State-of-the-art deepfake detection approaches rely on image-based features extracted via neural networks. We frame deepfake detection as a Deepfake Detection VQA (DD-VQA) task and model human intuition. We introduce a new annotated dataset and propose a Vision and Language Transformer-based framework for the DD-VQA task.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-31T19:11:58Z)
• DeepFidelity: Perceptual Forgery Fidelity Assessment for Deepfake Detection [67.3143177137102]
  Deepfake detection refers to detecting artificially generated or edited faces in images or videos. We propose a novel Deepfake detection framework named DeepFidelity to adaptively distinguish real and fake faces.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-07T07:19:45Z)
• AntifakePrompt: Prompt-Tuned Vision-Language Models are Fake Image Detectors [24.78672820633581]
  Deep generative models can create remarkably fake images while raising concerns about misinformation and copyright infringement. Deepfake detection technique is developed to distinguish between real and fake images. We propose a novel approach called AntifakePrompt, using Vision-Language Models and prompt tuning techniques.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-26T14:23:45Z)
• Seeing is not always believing: Benchmarking Human and Model Perception of AI-Generated Images [66.20578637253831]
  There is a growing concern that the advancement of artificial intelligence (AI) technology may produce fake photos. This study aims to comprehensively evaluate agents for distinguishing state-of-the-art AI-generated visual content.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-25T17:51:59Z)
• Parents and Children: Distinguishing Multimodal DeepFakes from Natural Images [60.34381768479834]
  Recent advancements in diffusion models have enabled the generation of realistic deepfakes from textual prompts in natural language. We pioneer a systematic study on deepfake detection generated by state-of-the-art diffusion models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-02T10:25:09Z)
• What makes fake images detectable? Understanding properties that generalize [55.4211069143719]
  Deep networks can still pick up on subtle artifacts in doctored images. We seek to understand what properties of fake images make them detectable. We show a technique to exaggerate these detectable properties.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-08-24T17:50:28Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.