Rethinking Legal Compliance Automation: Opportunities with Large Language Models

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2404.14356v1
• Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2024 17:10:27 GMT
• Title: Rethinking Legal Compliance Automation: Opportunities with Large Language Models
• Authors: Shabnam Hassani, Mehrdad Sabetzadeh, Daniel Amyot, Jain Liao,
• Abstract summary: We argue that the examination of (textual) legal artifacts should, first employ broader context than sentences. We present a compliance analysis approach designed to address these limitations.
• Score: 2.9088208525097365
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: As software-intensive systems face growing pressure to comply with laws and regulations, providing automated support for compliance analysis has become paramount. Despite advances in the Requirements Engineering (RE) community on legal compliance analysis, important obstacles remain in developing accurate and generalizable compliance automation solutions. This paper highlights some observed limitations of current approaches and examines how adopting new automation strategies that leverage Large Language Models (LLMs) can help address these shortcomings and open up fresh opportunities. Specifically, we argue that the examination of (textual) legal artifacts should, first, employ a broader context than sentences, which have widely been used as the units of analysis in past research. Second, the mode of analysis with legal artifacts needs to shift from classification and information extraction to more end-to-end strategies that are not only accurate but also capable of providing explanation and justification. We present a compliance analysis approach designed to address these limitations. We further outline our evaluation plan for the approach and provide preliminary evaluation results based on data processing agreements (DPAs) that must comply with the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR). Our initial findings suggest that our approach yields substantial accuracy improvements and, at the same time, provides justification for compliance decisions.

Related papers

• LawLLM: Law Large Language Model for the US Legal System [43.13850456765944]
  We introduce the Law Large Language Model (LawLLM), a multi-task model specifically designed for the US legal domain. LawLLM excels at Similar Case Retrieval (SCR), Precedent Case Recommendation (PCR), and Legal Judgment Prediction (LJP) We propose customized data preprocessing techniques for each task that transform raw legal data into a trainable format.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-27T21:51:30Z)
• MR-Ben: A Meta-Reasoning Benchmark for Evaluating System-2 Thinking in LLMs [55.20845457594977]
  Large language models (LLMs) have shown increasing capability in problem-solving and decision-making. We present a process-based benchmark MR-Ben that demands a meta-reasoning skill. Our meta-reasoning paradigm is especially suited for system-2 slow thinking.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-20T03:50:23Z)
• Detecting Multimodal Situations with Insufficient Context and Abstaining from Baseless Predictions [75.45274978665684]
  Vision-Language Understanding (VLU) benchmarks contain samples where answers rely on assumptions unsupported by the provided context. We collect contextual data for each sample whenever available and train a context selection module to facilitate evidence-based model predictions. We develop a general-purpose Context-AwaRe Abstention detector to identify samples lacking sufficient context and enhance model accuracy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-18T02:21:32Z)
• Empowering Prior to Court Legal Analysis: A Transparent and Accessible Dataset for Defensive Statement Classification and Interpretation [5.646219481667151]
  This paper introduces a novel dataset tailored for classification of statements made during police interviews, prior to court proceedings. We introduce a fine-tuned DistilBERT model that achieves state-of-the-art performance in distinguishing truthful from deceptive statements. We also present an XAI interface that empowers both legal professionals and non-specialists to interact with and benefit from our system.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-17T11:22:27Z)
• Enhancing Legal Compliance and Regulation Analysis with Large Language Models [0.0]
  This research explores the application of Large Language Models (LLMs) to accurately classify legal provisions and automate compliance checks. Our findings demonstrate promising results, indicating LLMs' significant potential to enhance legal compliance and regulatory analysis efficiency, notably by reducing manual workload and improving accuracy within reasonable time financial constraints.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-26T16:40:49Z)
• Demystifying Legalese: An Automated Approach for Summarizing and Analyzing Overlaps in Privacy Policies and Terms of Service [0.6240153531166704]
  Our work seeks to alleviate this issue by developing language models that provide automated, accessible summaries and scores for such documents. We compared transformer-based and conventional models during training on our dataset, and RoBERTa performed better overall with a remarkable 0.74 F1-score.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-17T19:53:59Z)
• It Is Time To Steer: A Scalable Framework for Analysis-driven Attack Graph Generation [50.06412862964449]
  Attack Graph (AG) represents the best-suited solution to support cyber risk assessment for multi-step attacks on computer networks. Current solutions propose to address the generation problem from the algorithmic perspective and postulate the analysis only after the generation is complete. This paper rethinks the classic AG analysis through a novel workflow in which the analyst can query the system anytime.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-27T10:44:58Z)
• Legal Requirements Analysis [2.3349787245442966]
  We explore a variety of methods for analyzing legal requirements and exemplify them on representations. We describe possible alternatives for creating machine-analyzable representations from regulations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-23T09:31:57Z)
• Precedent-Enhanced Legal Judgment Prediction with LLM and Domain-Model Collaboration [52.57055162778548]
  Legal Judgment Prediction (LJP) has become an increasingly crucial task in Legal AI. Precedents are the previous legal cases with similar facts, which are the basis for the judgment of the subsequent case in national legal systems. Recent advances in deep learning have enabled a variety of techniques to be used to solve the LJP task.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-13T16:47:20Z)
• Relational Action Bases: Formalization, Effective Safety Verification, and Invariants (Extended Version) [67.99023219822564]
  We introduce the general framework of relational action bases (RABs) RABs generalize existing models by lifting both restrictions. We demonstrate the effectiveness of this approach on a benchmark of data-aware business processes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-08-12T17:03:50Z)
• Learning to Limit Data Collection via Scaling Laws: Data Minimization Compliance in Practice [62.44110411199835]
  We build on literature in machine learning law to propose framework for limiting collection based on data interpretation that ties data to system performance. We formalize a data minimization criterion based on performance curve derivatives and provide an effective and interpretable piecewise power law technique.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-07-16T19:59:01Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.