Studying Large Language Model Behaviors Under Context-Memory Conflicts With Real Documents

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2404.16032v2
• Date: Tue, 08 Oct 2024 18:07:33 GMT
• Title: Studying Large Language Model Behaviors Under Context-Memory Conflicts With Real Documents
• Authors: Evgenii Kortukov, Alexander Rubinstein, Elisa Nguyen, Seong Joon Oh,
• Abstract summary: Retrieval-augmented generation mitigates many problems of fully parametric language models. In RAG, the model's knowledge can be updated from documents provided in context. We present a framework for studying such knowledge conflicts in a realistic setup.
• Score: 54.953320616069654
• License:
• Abstract: Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) mitigates many problems of fully parametric language models, such as temporal degradation, hallucinations, and lack of grounding. In RAG, the model's knowledge can be updated from documents provided in context. This leads to cases of conflict between the model's parametric knowledge and the contextual information, where the model may not always update its knowledge. Previous work studied context-memory knowledge conflicts by creating synthetic documents that contradict the model's correct parametric answers. We present a framework for studying such knowledge conflicts in a realistic setup. We update incorrect parametric knowledge using real conflicting documents. This reflects how knowledge conflicts arise in practice. In this realistic scenario, we find that knowledge updates fail less often than previously reported. In cases where the models still fail to update their answers, we find a parametric bias: the incorrect parametric answer appearing in context makes the knowledge update likelier to fail. These results suggest that the factual parametric knowledge of LLMs can negatively influence their reading abilities and behaviors. Our code is available at https://github.com/kortukov/realistic_knowledge_conflicts/ .

Related papers

• Context-Parametric Inversion: Why Instruction Finetuning May Not Actually Improve Context Reliance [68.56701216210617]
  In-principle, one would expect models to adapt to the user context better after instruction finetuning. We observe a surprising failure mode: during instruction tuning, the context reliance under knowledge conflicts initially increases as expected, but then gradually decreases.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-14T17:57:09Z)
• Robust and Scalable Model Editing for Large Language Models [75.95623066605259]
  We propose EREN (Edit models by REading Notes) to improve the scalability and robustness of LLM editing. Unlike existing techniques, it can integrate knowledge from multiple edits, and correctly respond to syntactically similar but semantically unrelated inputs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-26T06:57:23Z)
• A Glitch in the Matrix? Locating and Detecting Language Model Grounding with Fakepedia [57.31074448586854]
  Large language models (LLMs) have an impressive ability to draw on novel information supplied in their context. Yet the mechanisms underlying this contextual grounding remain unknown. We present a novel method to study grounding abilities using Fakepedia.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-04T17:35:42Z)
• R-Tuning: Instructing Large Language Models to Say `I Don't Know' [66.11375475253007]
  Large language models (LLMs) have revolutionized numerous domains with their impressive performance but still face their challenges. Previous instruction tuning methods force the model to complete a sentence no matter whether the model knows the knowledge or not. We present a new approach called Refusal-Aware Instruction Tuning (R-Tuning) Experimental results demonstrate R-Tuning effectively improves a model's ability to answer known questions and refrain from answering unknown questions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-16T08:45:44Z)
• RECKONING: Reasoning through Dynamic Knowledge Encoding [51.076603338764706]
  We show that language models can answer questions by reasoning over knowledge provided as part of the context. In these situations, the model fails to distinguish the knowledge that is necessary to answer the question. We propose teaching the model to reason more robustly by folding the provided contextual knowledge into the model's parameters.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-10T17:54:51Z)
• DisentQA: Disentangling Parametric and Contextual Knowledge with Counterfactual Question Answering [34.70206857546496]
  Question answering models commonly have access to two sources of "knowledge" during inference time. It is unclear whether the answer stems from the given non-parametric knowledge or not. We propose a new paradigm in which QA models are trained to disentangle the two sources of knowledge.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-10T15:34:44Z)
• Rich Knowledge Sources Bring Complex Knowledge Conflicts: Recalibrating Models to Reflect Conflicting Evidence [37.18100697469402]
  We simulate knowledge conflicts where parametric knowledge suggests one answer and different passages suggest different answers. We find retrieval performance heavily impacts which sources models rely on, and current models mostly rely on non-performing knowledge. We present a new calibration study, where models are discouraged from presenting any single answer when presented with multiple conflicting answer candidates.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-25T01:46:00Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.