Navigating Brain Language Representations: A Comparative Analysis of Neural Language Models and Psychologically Plausible Models

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2404.19364v1
• Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2024 08:48:07 GMT
• Title: Navigating Brain Language Representations: A Comparative Analysis of Neural Language Models and Psychologically Plausible Models
• Authors: Yunhao Zhang, Shaonan Wang, Xinyi Dong, Jiajun Yu, Chengqing Zong,
• Abstract summary: We compare encoding performance of various neural language models and psychologically plausible models. Surprisingly, our findings revealed that psychologically plausible models outperformed neural language models across diverse contexts.
• Score: 29.50162863143141
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Neural language models, particularly large-scale ones, have been consistently proven to be most effective in predicting brain neural activity across a range of studies. However, previous research overlooked the comparison of these models with psychologically plausible ones. Moreover, evaluations were reliant on limited, single-modality, and English cognitive datasets. To address these questions, we conducted an analysis comparing encoding performance of various neural language models and psychologically plausible models. Our study utilized extensive multi-modal cognitive datasets, examining bilingual word and discourse levels. Surprisingly, our findings revealed that psychologically plausible models outperformed neural language models across diverse contexts, encompassing different modalities such as fMRI and eye-tracking, and spanning languages from English to Chinese. Among psychologically plausible models, the one incorporating embodied information emerged as particularly exceptional. This model demonstrated superior performance at both word and discourse levels, exhibiting robust prediction of brain activation across numerous regions in both English and Chinese.

Related papers

• Large Language Models as Neurolinguistic Subjects: Identifying Internal Representations for Form and Meaning [49.60849499134362]
  This study investigates the linguistic understanding of Large Language Models (LLMs) regarding signifier (form) and signified (meaning) Traditional psycholinguistic evaluations often reflect statistical biases that may misrepresent LLMs' true linguistic capabilities. We introduce a neurolinguistic approach, utilizing a novel method that combines minimal pair and diagnostic probing to analyze activation patterns across model layers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-12T04:16:44Z)
• Brain-Like Language Processing via a Shallow Untrained Multihead Attention Network [16.317199232071232]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have been shown to be effective models of the human language system. In this work, we investigate the key architectural components driving the surprising alignment of untrained models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-21T12:54:03Z)
• MulCogBench: A Multi-modal Cognitive Benchmark Dataset for Evaluating Chinese and English Computational Language Models [44.74364661212373]
  This paper proposes MulCogBench, a cognitive benchmark dataset collected from native Chinese and English participants. It encompasses a variety of cognitive data, including subjective semantic ratings, eye-tracking, functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) and magnetoencephalography (MEG) Results show that language models share significant similarities with human cognitive data and the similarity patterns are modulated by the data modality and stimuli complexity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-02T07:49:57Z)
• Causal Graph in Language Model Rediscovers Cortical Hierarchy in Human Narrative Processing [0.0]
  Previous studies have demonstrated that the features of language models can be mapped to fMRI brain activity. This raises the question: is there a commonality between information processing in language models and the human brain? To estimate information flow patterns in a language model, we examined the causal relationships between different layers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-17T10:09:12Z)
• Neural Language Models are not Born Equal to Fit Brain Data, but Training Helps [75.84770193489639]
  We examine the impact of test loss, training corpus and model architecture on the prediction of functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging timecourses of participants listening to an audiobook. We find that untrained versions of each model already explain significant amount of signal in the brain by capturing similarity in brain responses across identical words. We suggest good practices for future studies aiming at explaining the human language system using neural language models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-07-07T15:37:17Z)
• Same Neurons, Different Languages: Probing Morphosyntax in Multilingual Pre-trained Models [84.86942006830772]
  We conjecture that multilingual pre-trained models can derive language-universal abstractions about grammar. We conduct the first large-scale empirical study over 43 languages and 14 morphosyntactic categories with a state-of-the-art neuron-level probe.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-04T12:22:31Z)
• Dependency-based Mixture Language Models [53.152011258252315]
  We introduce the Dependency-based Mixture Language Models. In detail, we first train neural language models with a novel dependency modeling objective. We then formulate the next-token probability by mixing the previous dependency modeling probability distributions with self-attention.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-19T06:28:30Z)
• Connecting Neural Response measurements & Computational Models of language: a non-comprehensive guide [5.523143941738335]
  Recent advances in language modelling and in neuroimaging promise potential improvements in the investigation of language's neurobiology. This survey traces a line from early research linking Event Related Potentials and complexity measures derived from simple language models to contemporary studies employing Artificial Neural Network models trained on large corpora.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-10T11:24:54Z)
• Perception Point: Identifying Critical Learning Periods in Speech for Bilingual Networks [58.24134321728942]
  We compare and identify cognitive aspects on deep neural-based visual lip-reading models. We observe a strong correlation between these theories in cognitive psychology and our unique modeling.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-13T05:30:50Z)
• Model-based analysis of brain activity reveals the hierarchy of language in 305 subjects [82.81964713263483]
  A popular approach to decompose the neural bases of language consists in correlating, across individuals, the brain responses to different stimuli. Here, we show that a model-based approach can reach equivalent results within subjects exposed to natural stimuli.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-12T15:30:21Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.