Large Language Models in the Clinic: A Comprehensive Benchmark

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2405.00716v3
• Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2024 17:48:18 GMT
• Title: Large Language Models in the Clinic: A Comprehensive Benchmark
• Authors: Andrew Liu, Hongjian Zhou, Yining Hua, Omid Rohanian, Anshul Thakur, Lei Clifton, David A. Clifton,
• Abstract summary: We build a benchmark ClinicBench to better understand large language models (LLMs) in the clinic. We construct six novel datasets and complex clinical tasks that are close to real-world practice. We conduct an extensive evaluation of twenty-two LLMs under both zero-shot and few-shot settings.
• Score: 17.22274050071597
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: The adoption of large language models (LLMs) to assist clinicians has attracted remarkable attention. Existing works mainly adopt the close-ended question-answering (QA) task with answer options for evaluation. However, many clinical decisions involve answering open-ended questions without pre-set options. To better understand LLMs in the clinic, we construct a benchmark ClinicBench. We first collect eleven existing datasets covering diverse clinical language generation, understanding, and reasoning tasks. Furthermore, we construct six novel datasets and complex clinical tasks that are close to real-world practice, i.e., referral QA, treatment recommendation, hospitalization (long document) summarization, patient education, pharmacology QA and drug interaction for emerging drugs. We conduct an extensive evaluation of twenty-two LLMs under both zero-shot and few-shot settings. Finally, we invite medical experts to evaluate the clinical usefulness of LLMs.

Related papers

• CliBench: Multifaceted Evaluation of Large Language Models in Clinical Decisions on Diagnoses, Procedures, Lab Tests Orders and Prescriptions [16.310913127940857]
  We introduce CliBench, a novel benchmark developed from the MIMIC IV dataset. This benchmark offers a comprehensive and realistic assessment of LLMs' capabilities in clinical diagnosis. We conduct a zero-shot evaluation of leading LLMs to assess their proficiency in clinical decision-making.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-14T11:10:17Z)
• CLUE: A Clinical Language Understanding Evaluation for LLMs [2.3814275542331385]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) are expected to significantly contribute to patient care, diagnostics, and administrative processes. Assessing the models' suitability for this sensitive application area is of utmost importance. We present the Clinical Language Understanding Evaluation (CLUE), a benchmark tailored to evaluate LLMs on clinical tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-05T12:51:37Z)
• Benchmarking Large Language Models on Answering and Explaining Challenging Medical Questions [19.436999992810797]
  We construct two new datasets: JAMA Clinical Challenge and Medbullets. JAMA Clinical Challenge consists of questions based on challenging clinical cases, while Medbullets comprises simulated clinical questions. We evaluate seven LLMs on the two datasets using various prompts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-28T05:44:41Z)
• EHRNoteQA: An LLM Benchmark for Real-World Clinical Practice Using Discharge Summaries [9.031182965159976]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) show promise in efficiently analyzing vast and complex data. We introduce EHRNoteQA, a novel benchmark built on the MIMIC-IV EHR, comprising 962 different QA pairs each linked to distinct patients' discharge summaries. EHRNoteQA includes questions that require information across multiple discharge summaries and covers eight diverse topics, mirroring the complexity and diversity of real clinical inquiries.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-25T09:41:50Z)
• AI Hospital: Benchmarking Large Language Models in a Multi-agent Medical Interaction Simulator [69.51568871044454]
  We introduce textbfAI Hospital, a framework simulating dynamic medical interactions between emphDoctor as player and NPCs. This setup allows for realistic assessments of LLMs in clinical scenarios. We develop the Multi-View Medical Evaluation benchmark, utilizing high-quality Chinese medical records and NPCs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-15T06:46:48Z)
• Experience and Evidence are the eyes of an excellent summarizer! Towards Knowledge Infused Multi-modal Clinical Conversation Summarization [46.613541673040544]
  We propose a knowledge-infused, multi-modal, multi-tasking medical domain identification and clinical conversation summary generation framework. We develop a multi-modal, multi-intent clinical conversation summarization corpus annotated with intent, symptom, and summary. The extensive set of experiments led to the following findings: (a) critical significance of visuals, (b) more precise and medical entity preserving summary with additional knowledge infusion, and (c) a correlation between medical department identification and clinical synopsis generation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-27T15:49:43Z)
• Adapted Large Language Models Can Outperform Medical Experts in Clinical Text Summarization [8.456700096020601]
  Large language models (LLMs) have shown promise in natural language processing (NLP), but their effectiveness on a diverse range of clinical summarization tasks remains unproven. In this study, we apply adaptation methods to eight LLMs, spanning four distinct clinical summarization tasks. A clinical reader study with ten physicians evaluates summary, completeness, correctness, and conciseness; in a majority of cases, summaries from our best adapted LLMs are either equivalent (45%) or superior (36%) compared to summaries from medical experts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-14T05:15:01Z)
• Self-Verification Improves Few-Shot Clinical Information Extraction [73.6905567014859]
  Large language models (LLMs) have shown the potential to accelerate clinical curation via few-shot in-context learning. They still struggle with issues regarding accuracy and interpretability, especially in mission-critical domains such as health. Here, we explore a general mitigation framework using self-verification, which leverages the LLM to provide provenance for its own extraction and check its own outputs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-30T22:05:11Z)
• VBridge: Connecting the Dots Between Features, Explanations, and Data for Healthcare Models [85.4333256782337]
  VBridge is a visual analytics tool that seamlessly incorporates machine learning explanations into clinicians' decision-making workflow. We identified three key challenges, including clinicians' unfamiliarity with ML features, lack of contextual information, and the need for cohort-level evidence. We demonstrated the effectiveness of VBridge through two case studies and expert interviews with four clinicians.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-08-04T17:34:13Z)
• Self-supervised Answer Retrieval on Clinical Notes [68.87777592015402]
  We introduce CAPR, a rule-based self-supervision objective for training Transformer language models for domain-specific passage matching. We apply our objective in four Transformer-based architectures: Contextual Document Vectors, Bi-, Poly- and Cross-encoders. We report that CAPR outperforms strong baselines in the retrieval of domain-specific passages and effectively generalizes across rule-based and human-labeled passages.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-08-02T10:42:52Z)
• Benchmarking Automated Clinical Language Simplification: Dataset, Algorithm, and Evaluation [48.87254340298189]
  We construct a new dataset named MedLane to support the development and evaluation of automated clinical language simplification approaches. We propose a new model called DECLARE that follows the human annotation procedure and achieves state-of-the-art performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-12-04T06:09:02Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.