Measuring the Exploitation of Weaknesses in the Wild

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2405.01289v1
• Date: Thu, 2 May 2024 13:49:51 GMT
• Title: Measuring the Exploitation of Weaknesses in the Wild
• Authors: Peter Mell, Irena Bojanova, Carlos Galhardo,
• Abstract summary: A weakness is a bug or fault type that can be exploited through an operation that results in a security-relevant error. This work introduces a simple metric to determine the probability of a weakness being exploited in the wild for any 30-day window. Our analysis reveals that 92 % of the weaknesses are not being constantly exploited.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Identifying the software weaknesses exploited by attacks supports efforts to reduce developer introduction of vulnerabilities and to guide security code review efforts. A weakness is a bug or fault type that can be exploited through an operation that results in a security-relevant error. Ideally, the security community would measure the prevalence of the software weaknesses used in actual exploitation. This work advances that goal by introducing a simple metric that utilizes public data feeds to determine the probability of a weakness being exploited in the wild for any 30-day window. The metric is evaluated on a set of 130 weaknesses that were commonly found in vulnerabilities between April 2021 and March 2024. Our analysis reveals that 92 % of the weaknesses are not being constantly exploited.

Related papers

• WildGuard: Open One-Stop Moderation Tools for Safety Risks, Jailbreaks, and Refusals of LLMs [54.10865585773691]
  We introduce WildGuard -- an open, light-weight moderation tool for LLM safety. WildGuard achieves three goals: identifying malicious intent in user prompts, detecting safety risks of model responses, and determining model refusal rate.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-26T16:58:20Z)
• A Relevance Model for Threat-Centric Ranking of Cybersecurity Vulnerabilities [0.29998889086656577]
  The relentless process of tracking and remediating vulnerabilities is a top concern for cybersecurity professionals. We provide a framework for vulnerability management specifically focused on mitigating threats using adversary criteria derived from MITRE ATT&CK. Our results show an average 71.5% - 91.3% improvement towards the identification of vulnerabilities likely to be targeted and exploited by cyber threat actors.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-09T23:29:12Z)
• Rethinking the Vulnerabilities of Face Recognition Systems:From a Practical Perspective [53.24281798458074]
  Face Recognition Systems (FRS) have increasingly integrated into critical applications, including surveillance and user authentication. Recent studies have revealed vulnerabilities in FRS to adversarial (e.g., adversarial patch attacks) and backdoor attacks (e.g., training data poisoning)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-21T13:34:23Z)
• Causative Insights into Open Source Software Security using Large Language Code Embeddings and Semantic Vulnerability Graph [3.623199159688412]
  Open Source Software (OSS) vulnerabilities can cause unauthorized access, data breaches, network disruptions, and privacy violations. Recent deep-learning techniques have shown great promise in identifying and localizing vulnerabilities in source code. Our study shows a 24% improvement in code repair capabilities compared to previous methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-13T10:33:22Z)
• Toward Effective Secure Code Reviews: An Empirical Study of Security-Related Coding Weaknesses [14.134803943492345]
  We conducted an empirical case study in two large open-source projects, OpenSSL and PHP. Based on 135,560 code review comments, we found that reviewers raised security concerns in 35 out of 40 coding weakness categories. Some coding weaknesses related to past vulnerabilities, such as memory errors and resource management, were discussed less often than the vulnerabilities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-28T00:49:00Z)
• Empirical Analysis of Software Vulnerabilities Causing Timing Side Channels [2.0794749869068005]
  This study examines the timing attack-related vulnerabilities in non-cryptographic software. We found that a majority of the timing attack-related vulnerabilities were introduced due to not following known secure coding practices. The findings of this study are expected to help the software security community gain evidence-based information about the nature and causes of the vulnerabilities related to timing attacks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-23T01:38:03Z)
• Safety Margins for Reinforcement Learning [53.10194953873209]
  We show how to leverage proxy criticality metrics to generate safety margins. We evaluate our approach on learned policies from APE-X and A3C within an Atari environment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-25T16:49:54Z)
• Backdoor Attacks Against Incremental Learners: An Empirical Evaluation Study [79.33449311057088]
  This paper empirically reveals the high vulnerability of 11 typical incremental learners against poisoning-based backdoor attack on 3 learning scenarios. The defense mechanism based on activation clustering is found to be effective in detecting our trigger pattern to mitigate potential security risks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-28T09:17:48Z)
• Attack Techniques and Threat Identification for Vulnerabilities [1.1689657956099035]
  prioritization and focus become critical, to spend their limited time on the highest risk vulnerabilities. In this work, we use machine learning and natural language processing techniques, as well as several publicly available data sets. We first map the vulnerabilities to a standard set of common weaknesses, and then common weaknesses to the attack techniques. This approach yields a Mean Reciprocal Rank (MRR) of 0.95, an accuracy comparable with those reported for state-of-the-art systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-22T15:27:49Z)
• VELVET: a noVel Ensemble Learning approach to automatically locate VulnErable sTatements [62.93814803258067]
  This paper presents VELVET, a novel ensemble learning approach to locate vulnerable statements in source code. Our model combines graph-based and sequence-based neural networks to successfully capture the local and global context of a program graph. VELVET achieves 99.6% and 43.6% top-1 accuracy over synthetic data and real-world data, respectively.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-12-20T22:45:27Z)
• Dos and Don'ts of Machine Learning in Computer Security [74.1816306998445]
  Despite great potential, machine learning in security is prone to subtle pitfalls that undermine its performance. We identify common pitfalls in the design, implementation, and evaluation of learning-based security systems. We propose actionable recommendations to support researchers in avoiding or mitigating the pitfalls where possible.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-19T13:09:31Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.