Safety Margins for Reinforcement Learning
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2307.13642v2
- Date: Wed, 09 Oct 2024 01:57:11 GMT
- Title: Safety Margins for Reinforcement Learning
- Authors: Alexander Grushin, Walt Woods, Alvaro Velasquez, Simon Khan,
- Abstract summary: We show how to leverage proxy criticality metrics to generate safety margins.
We evaluate our approach on learned policies from APE-X and A3C within an Atari environment.
- Score: 53.10194953873209
- License:
- Abstract: Any autonomous controller will be unsafe in some situations. The ability to quantitatively identify when these unsafe situations are about to occur is crucial for drawing timely human oversight in, e.g., freight transportation applications. In this work, we demonstrate that the true criticality of an agent's situation can be robustly defined as the mean reduction in reward given some number of random actions. Proxy criticality metrics that are computable in real-time (i.e., without actually simulating the effects of random actions) can be compared to the true criticality, and we show how to leverage these proxy metrics to generate safety margins, which directly tie the consequences of potentially incorrect actions to an anticipated loss in overall performance. We evaluate our approach on learned policies from APE-X and A3C within an Atari environment, and demonstrate how safety margins decrease as agents approach failure states. The integration of safety margins into programs for monitoring deployed agents allows for the real-time identification of potentially catastrophic situations.
Related papers
- Internal Activation as the Polar Star for Steering Unsafe LLM Behavior [50.463399903987245]
We introduce SafeSwitch, a framework that dynamically regulates unsafe outputs by monitoring and utilizing the model's internal states.
Our empirical results show that SafeSwitch reduces harmful outputs by over 80% on safety benchmarks while maintaining strong utility.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-02-03T04:23:33Z) - SafetyAnalyst: Interpretable, transparent, and steerable safety moderation for AI behavior [56.10557932893919]
We present SafetyAnalyst, a novel AI safety moderation framework.
Given an AI behavior, SafetyAnalyst uses chain-of-thought reasoning to analyze its potential consequences.
It aggregates all harmful and beneficial effects into a harmfulness score using fully interpretable weight parameters.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-22T03:38:37Z) - Criticality and Safety Margins for Reinforcement Learning [53.10194953873209]
We seek to define a criticality framework with both a quantifiable ground truth and a clear significance to users.
We introduce true criticality as the expected drop in reward when an agent deviates from its policy for n consecutive random actions.
We also introduce the concept of proxy criticality, a low-overhead metric that has a statistically monotonic relationship to true criticality.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-09-26T21:00:45Z) - Safeguarded Progress in Reinforcement Learning: Safe Bayesian
Exploration for Control Policy Synthesis [63.532413807686524]
This paper addresses the problem of maintaining safety during training in Reinforcement Learning (RL)
We propose a new architecture that handles the trade-off between efficient progress and safety during exploration.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-12-18T16:09:43Z) - SMARLA: A Safety Monitoring Approach for Deep Reinforcement Learning Agents [7.33319373357049]
This paper introduces SMARLA, a black-box safety monitoring approach specifically designed for Deep Reinforcement Learning (DRL) agents.
SMARLA utilizes machine learning to predict safety violations by observing the agent's behavior during execution.
Empirical results reveal that SMARLA is accurate at predicting safety violations, with a low false positive rate, and can predict violations at an early stage, approximately halfway through the execution of the agent, before violations occur.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-08-03T21:08:51Z) - Safe Deep Reinforcement Learning by Verifying Task-Level Properties [84.64203221849648]
Cost functions are commonly employed in Safe Deep Reinforcement Learning (DRL)
The cost is typically encoded as an indicator function due to the difficulty of quantifying the risk of policy decisions in the state space.
In this paper, we investigate an alternative approach that uses domain knowledge to quantify the risk in the proximity of such states by defining a violation metric.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-02-20T15:24:06Z) - Lyapunov-based uncertainty-aware safe reinforcement learning [0.0]
InReinforcement learning (RL) has shown a promising performance in learning optimal policies for a variety of sequential decision-making tasks.
In many real-world RL problems, besides optimizing the main objectives, the agent is expected to satisfy a certain level of safety.
We propose a Lyapunov-based uncertainty-aware safe RL model to address these limitations.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-07-29T13:08:15Z) - Learning to Act Safely with Limited Exposure and Almost Sure Certainty [1.0323063834827415]
This paper aims to put forward the concept that learning to take safe actions in unknown environments, even with probability one guarantees, can be achieved without the need for exploratory trials.
We first focus on the canonical multi-armed bandit problem and seek to study the intrinsic trade-offs of learning safety in the presence of uncertainty.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-05-18T18:05:12Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.