Dynamic Local Average Treatment Effects

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2405.01463v3
• Date: Sun, 04 May 2025 20:29:04 GMT
• Title: Dynamic Local Average Treatment Effects
• Authors: Ravi B. Sojitra, Vasilis Syrgkanis,
• Abstract summary: We consider Dynamic Treatment Regimes (DTRs) with One Sided Noncompliance in digital recommendations and adaptive medical trials.<n>We provide nonparametric identification, estimation, and inference for Dynamic Local Average Treatment Effects (LATEs)<n>We show that the assumptions are sufficient to identify Dynamic LATEs for treating in multiple time periods.
• Score: 19.014535120129338
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: We consider Dynamic Treatment Regimes (DTRs) with One Sided Noncompliance that arise in applications such as digital recommendations and adaptive medical trials. These are settings where decision makers encourage individuals to take treatments over time, but adapt encouragements based on previous encouragements, treatments, states, and outcomes. Importantly, individuals may not comply with encouragements based on unobserved confounders. For settings with binary treatments and encouragements, we provide nonparametric identification, estimation, and inference for Dynamic Local Average Treatment Effects (LATEs), which are expected values of multiple time period treatment effect contrasts for the respective complier subpopulations. Under One Sided Noncompliance and sequential extensions of the assumptions in Imbens and Angrist (1994), we show that one can identify Dynamic LATEs that correspond to treating at single time steps. In Staggered Adoption settings, we show that the assumptions are sufficient to identify Dynamic LATEs for treating in multiple time periods. Moreover, this result extends to any setting where the effect of a treatment in one period is uncorrelated with the compliance event in a subsequent period.

Related papers

• On Multiple Robustness of Proximal Dynamic Treatment Regimes [6.4049477424590355]
  Estimating optimal dynamic treatment regimes via sequential randomized trials might face costly and ethical hurdles.<n>We propose proximal causal inference framework for learning optimal dynamic treatment regimes when the unconfoundedness assumption fails.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-23T11:38:40Z)
• Beyond the ATE: Interpretable Modelling of Treatment Effects over Dose and Time [46.2482873419289]
  We propose a framework for modelling treatment effect trajectories as smooth surfaces over dose and time.<n>Our approach decouples the estimation of trajectory shape from the specification of clinically relevant properties.<n>We show that our method yields accurate, interpretable, and editable models of treatment dynamics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-09T20:33:33Z)
• Sequential Treatment Effect Estimation with Unmeasured Confounders [24.064743106746885]
  This paper studies the cumulative causal effects of sequential treatments in the presence of unmeasured confounders.<n>We propose a novel Decomposing Sequential Instrumental Variable framework for CounterFactual Regression.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-14T03:42:43Z)
• TV-SurvCaus: Dynamic Representation Balancing for Causal Survival Analysis [0.0]
  TV-SurvCaus is a novel framework that extends representation balancing techniques to the time-varying treatment setting for survival analysis.<n>We provide theoretical guarantees through (1) a generalized bound for time-varying precision in estimation of heterogeneous effects, (2) variance control via sequential balancing weights, (3) consistency results for dynamic treatment regimes, and (5) a formal bound on the bias due to treatment-confounder feedback.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-03T11:04:52Z)
• Towards Regulatory-Confirmed Adaptive Clinical Trials: Machine Learning Opportunities and Solutions [59.28853595868749]
  We introduce two new objectives for future clinical trials that integrate regulatory constraints and treatment policy value for both the entire population and under-served populations. We formulate Randomize First Augment Next (RFAN), a new framework for designing Phase III clinical trials. Our framework consists of a standard randomized component followed by an adaptive one, jointly meant to efficiently and safely acquire and assign patients into treatment arms during the trial.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-12T10:17:54Z)
• Difference-in-Differences with Time-varying Continuous Treatments using Double/Debiased Machine Learning [0.0]
  We propose a difference-in-differences (DiD) method for continuous treatment and multiple time periods. Our framework assesses the average treatment effect on the treated (ATET) when comparing two non-zero treatment doses.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-28T15:10:43Z)
• Stage-Aware Learning for Dynamic Treatments [3.6923632650826486]
  We propose a novel individualized learning method for dynamic treatment regimes. By relaxing the restriction that the observed trajectory must be fully aligned with the optimal treatments, our approach substantially improves the sample efficiency and stability of IPWE-based methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-30T06:35:31Z)
• TCFimt: Temporal Counterfactual Forecasting from Individual Multiple Treatment Perspective [50.675845725806724]
  We propose a comprehensive framework of temporal counterfactual forecasting from an individual multiple treatment perspective (TCFimt) TCFimt constructs adversarial tasks in a seq2seq framework to alleviate selection and time-varying bias and designs a contrastive learning-based block to decouple a mixed treatment effect into separated main treatment effects and causal interactions. The proposed method shows satisfactory performance in predicting future outcomes with specific treatments and in choosing optimal treatment type and timing than state-of-the-art methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-17T15:01:05Z)
• Continuous-Time Modeling of Counterfactual Outcomes Using Neural Controlled Differential Equations [84.42837346400151]
  Estimating counterfactual outcomes over time has the potential to unlock personalized healthcare. Existing causal inference approaches consider regular, discrete-time intervals between observations and treatment decisions. We propose a controllable simulation environment based on a model of tumor growth for a range of scenarios.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-16T17:15:15Z)
• Disentangled Counterfactual Recurrent Networks for Treatment Effect Inference over Time [71.30985926640659]
  We introduce the Disentangled Counterfactual Recurrent Network (DCRN), a sequence-to-sequence architecture that estimates treatment outcomes over time. With an architecture that is completely inspired by the causal structure of treatment influence over time, we advance forecast accuracy and disease understanding. We demonstrate that DCRN outperforms current state-of-the-art methods in forecasting treatment responses, on both real and simulated data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-12-07T16:40:28Z)
• Evaluating (weighted) dynamic treatment effects by double machine learning [0.12891210250935145]
  We consider evaluating the causal effects of dynamic treatments in a data-driven way under a selection-on-observables assumption. We make use of so-called Neyman-orthogonal score functions, which imply the robustness of treatment effect estimation to moderate (local) misspecifications. We demonstrate that the estimators are regularityally normal and $sqrtn$-consistent under specific conditions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-12-01T09:55:40Z)
• DTR Bandit: Learning to Make Response-Adaptive Decisions With Low Regret [59.81290762273153]
  Dynamic treatment regimes (DTRs) are personalized, adaptive, multi-stage treatment plans that adapt treatment decisions to an individual's initial features and to intermediate outcomes and features at each subsequent stage. We propose a novel algorithm that, by carefully balancing exploration and exploitation, is guaranteed to achieve rate-optimal regret when the transition and reward models are linear.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-05-06T13:03:42Z)
• Estimating Counterfactual Treatment Outcomes over Time Through Adversarially Balanced Representations [114.16762407465427]
  We introduce the Counterfactual Recurrent Network (CRN) to estimate treatment effects over time. CRN uses domain adversarial training to build balancing representations of the patient history. We show how our model achieves lower error in estimating counterfactuals and in choosing the correct treatment and timing of treatment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-02-10T20:47:36Z)
• Generalization Bounds and Representation Learning for Estimation of Potential Outcomes and Causal Effects [61.03579766573421]
  We study estimation of individual-level causal effects, such as a single patient's response to alternative medication. We devise representation learning algorithms that minimize our bound, by regularizing the representation's induced treatment group distance. We extend these algorithms to simultaneously learn a weighted representation to further reduce treatment group distances.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-01-21T10:16:33Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.