TCFimt: Temporal Counterfactual Forecasting from Individual Multiple
Treatment Perspective
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2212.08890v1
- Date: Sat, 17 Dec 2022 15:01:05 GMT
- Title: TCFimt: Temporal Counterfactual Forecasting from Individual Multiple
Treatment Perspective
- Authors: Pengfei Xi, Guifeng Wang, Zhipeng Hu, Yu Xiong, Mingming Gong, Wei
Huang, Runze Wu, Yu Ding, Tangjie Lv, Changjie Fan, Xiangnan Feng
- Abstract summary: We propose a comprehensive framework of temporal counterfactual forecasting from an individual multiple treatment perspective (TCFimt)
TCFimt constructs adversarial tasks in a seq2seq framework to alleviate selection and time-varying bias and designs a contrastive learning-based block to decouple a mixed treatment effect into separated main treatment effects and causal interactions.
The proposed method shows satisfactory performance in predicting future outcomes with specific treatments and in choosing optimal treatment type and timing than state-of-the-art methods.
- Score: 50.675845725806724
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: Determining causal effects of temporal multi-intervention assists
decision-making. Restricted by time-varying bias, selection bias, and
interactions of multiple interventions, the disentanglement and estimation of
multiple treatment effects from individual temporal data is still rare. To
tackle these challenges, we propose a comprehensive framework of temporal
counterfactual forecasting from an individual multiple treatment perspective
(TCFimt). TCFimt constructs adversarial tasks in a seq2seq framework to
alleviate selection and time-varying bias and designs a contrastive
learning-based block to decouple a mixed treatment effect into separated main
treatment effects and causal interactions which further improves estimation
accuracy. Through implementing experiments on two real-world datasets from
distinct fields, the proposed method shows satisfactory performance in
predicting future outcomes with specific treatments and in choosing optimal
treatment type and timing than state-of-the-art methods.
Related papers
- Difference-in-Differences with Time-varying Continuous Treatments using Double/Debiased Machine Learning [0.0]
We propose a difference-in-differences (DiD) method for continuous treatment and multiple time periods.
Our framework assesses the average treatment effect on the treated (ATET) when comparing two non-zero treatment doses.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-28T15:10:43Z) - Continuous-Time Modeling of Counterfactual Outcomes Using Neural
Controlled Differential Equations [84.42837346400151]
Estimating counterfactual outcomes over time has the potential to unlock personalized healthcare.
Existing causal inference approaches consider regular, discrete-time intervals between observations and treatment decisions.
We propose a controllable simulation environment based on a model of tumor growth for a range of scenarios.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-06-16T17:15:15Z) - Disentangled Counterfactual Recurrent Networks for Treatment Effect
Inference over Time [71.30985926640659]
We introduce the Disentangled Counterfactual Recurrent Network (DCRN), a sequence-to-sequence architecture that estimates treatment outcomes over time.
With an architecture that is completely inspired by the causal structure of treatment influence over time, we advance forecast accuracy and disease understanding.
We demonstrate that DCRN outperforms current state-of-the-art methods in forecasting treatment responses, on both real and simulated data.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-12-07T16:40:28Z) - SurvITE: Learning Heterogeneous Treatment Effects from Time-to-Event
Data [83.50281440043241]
We study the problem of inferring heterogeneous treatment effects from time-to-event data.
We propose a novel deep learning method for treatment-specific hazard estimation based on balancing representations.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-10-26T20:13:17Z) - Sequential Deconfounding for Causal Inference with Unobserved
Confounders [18.586616164230566]
We develop the Sequential Deconfounder, a method that enables estimating individualized treatment effects over time.
This is the first deconfounding method that can be used in a general sequential setting.
We prove that using our method yields unbiased estimates of individualized treatment responses over time.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-04-16T09:56:39Z) - Evaluating (weighted) dynamic treatment effects by double machine
learning [0.12891210250935145]
We consider evaluating the causal effects of dynamic treatments in a data-driven way under a selection-on-observables assumption.
We make use of so-called Neyman-orthogonal score functions, which imply the robustness of treatment effect estimation to moderate (local) misspecifications.
We demonstrate that the estimators are regularityally normal and $sqrtn$-consistent under specific conditions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-12-01T09:55:40Z) - Estimating Counterfactual Treatment Outcomes over Time Through
Adversarially Balanced Representations [114.16762407465427]
We introduce the Counterfactual Recurrent Network (CRN) to estimate treatment effects over time.
CRN uses domain adversarial training to build balancing representations of the patient history.
We show how our model achieves lower error in estimating counterfactuals and in choosing the correct treatment and timing of treatment.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-02-10T20:47:36Z) - Generalization Bounds and Representation Learning for Estimation of
Potential Outcomes and Causal Effects [61.03579766573421]
We study estimation of individual-level causal effects, such as a single patient's response to alternative medication.
We devise representation learning algorithms that minimize our bound, by regularizing the representation's induced treatment group distance.
We extend these algorithms to simultaneously learn a weighted representation to further reduce treatment group distances.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-01-21T10:16:33Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.