"Sometimes You Just Gotta Risk It for the Biscuit": A Portrait of Student Risk-Taking

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2405.01477v3
• Date: Mon, 07 Oct 2024 22:42:58 GMT
• Title: "Sometimes You Just Gotta Risk It for the Biscuit": A Portrait of Student Risk-Taking
• Authors: Juho Leinonen, Paul Denny,
• Abstract summary: This study aims to partially replicate prior research on risk-taking behavior in software engineers. Students were presented with a hypothetical scenario related to meeting a course project deadline, where they had to choose between a risky option and a safer alternative. We examined several factors that might influence these choices, including the framing of the decision (as a potential gain or loss), students' enjoyment of programming, perceived difficulty of programming, and their performance in the course.
• Score: 4.280736832561806
• License:
• Abstract: Understanding how individuals make decisions involving risk is a fundamental aspect of behavioral research. Despite the ubiquity of risk in various aspects of life, limited empirical work has explored student risk-taking behavior in computing education. This study aims to partially replicate prior research on risk-taking behavior in software engineers while focusing on students, shedding light on the factors that affect their risk-taking choices. In our work, students were presented with a hypothetical scenario related to meeting a course project deadline, where they had to choose between a risky option and a safer alternative. We examined several factors that might influence these choices, including the framing of the decision (as a potential gain or loss), students' enjoyment of programming, perceived difficulty of programming, and their performance in the course. Our findings reveal intriguing insights into student risk-taking behavior. Similar to software engineers in prior work, the framing of the decision significantly impacted the choices students made, with the loss framing leading to a higher likelihood for risky choices. Surprisingly, students displayed a greater inclination towards risk-taking compared to their professional counterparts in prior research. Furthermore, we observed that students' performance in the course and their enjoyment of programming had a subtle correlation with their risk-taking tendencies, with better-performing students and those who enjoyed programming being marginally more prone to taking risks. Notably, we did not find statistically significant correlations between perceived difficulty of programming and risk-taking behavior among students.

Related papers

• Risks and NLP Design: A Case Study on Procedural Document QA [52.557503571760215]
  We argue that clearer assessments of risks and harms to users will be possible when we specialize the analysis to more concrete applications and their plausible users. We conduct a risk-oriented error analysis that could then inform the design of a future system to be deployed with lower risk of harm and better performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-16T17:23:43Z)
• RiskBench: A Scenario-based Benchmark for Risk Identification [4.263035319815899]
  This work focuses on risk identification, the process of identifying and analyzing risks stemming from dynamic traffic participants and unexpected events. We introduce textbfRiskBench, a large-scale scenario-based benchmark for risk identification. We assess the ability of ten algorithms to (1) detect and locate risks, (2) anticipate risks, and (3) facilitate decision-making.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-04T06:21:22Z)
• Risk-reducing design and operations toolkit: 90 strategies for managing risk and uncertainty in decision problems [65.268245109828]
  This paper develops a catalog of such strategies and develops a framework for them. It argues that they provide an efficient response to decision problems that are seemingly intractable due to high uncertainty. It then proposes a framework to incorporate them into decision theory using multi-objective optimization.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-06T16:14:32Z)
• Anticipatory Thinking Challenges in Open Worlds: Risk Management [7.820667552233988]
  As AI systems become part of everyday life, they too have begun to manage risk. Learning to identify and mitigate low-frequency, high-impact risks is at odds with the observational bias required to train machine learning models. Our goal is to spur research into solutions that assess and improve the anticipatory thinking required by AI agents to manage risk in open-worlds and ultimately the real-world.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-22T18:31:17Z)
• A Survey of Risk-Aware Multi-Armed Bandits [84.67376599822569]
  We review various risk measures of interest, and comment on their properties. We consider algorithms for the regret minimization setting, where the exploration-exploitation trade-off manifests. We conclude by commenting on persisting challenges and fertile areas for future research.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-12T02:20:34Z)
• Who will dropout from university? Academic risk prediction based on interpretable machine learning [0.0]
  It predicts academic risk based on the LightGBM model and the interpretable machine learning method of Shapley value. From the local perspective, the factors affecting academic risk vary from person to person.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-12-02T09:43:31Z)
• Risk Conditioned Neural Motion Planning [14.018786843419862]
  Risk-bounded motion planning is an important yet difficult problem for safety-critical tasks. We propose an extension of soft actor critic model to estimate the execution risk of a plan through a risk critic. We show the advantage of our model in terms of both computational time and plan quality, compared to a state-of-the-art mathematical programming baseline.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-08-04T05:33:52Z)
• Policy Gradient Bayesian Robust Optimization for Imitation Learning [49.881386773269746]
  We derive a novel policy gradient-style robust optimization approach, PG-BROIL, to balance expected performance and risk. Results suggest PG-BROIL can produce a family of behaviors ranging from risk-neutral to risk-averse.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-11T16:49:15Z)
• Bounded Risk-Sensitive Markov Games: Forward Policy Design and Inverse Reward Learning with Iterative Reasoning and Cumulative Prospect Theory [33.57592649823294]
  We investigate the problem of bounded risk-sensitive Markov Game (BRSMG) and its inverse reward learning problem. We show that humans have bounded intelligence and maximize risk-sensitive utilities in BRSMGs. The results show that the behaviors of agents demonstrate both risk-averse and risk-seeking characteristics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-09-03T07:32:32Z)
• Risk-Sensitive Reinforcement Learning: Near-Optimal Risk-Sample Tradeoff in Regret [115.85354306623368]
  We study risk-sensitive reinforcement learning in episodic Markov decision processes with unknown transition kernels. We propose two provably efficient model-free algorithms, Risk-Sensitive Value Iteration (RSVI) and Risk-Sensitive Q-learning (RSQ) We prove that RSVI attains an $tildeObig(lambda(|beta| H2) cdot sqrtH3 S2AT big)$ regret, while RSQ attains an $tildeObig(lambda
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-22T19:28:26Z)
• Learning Bounds for Risk-sensitive Learning [86.50262971918276]
  In risk-sensitive learning, one aims to find a hypothesis that minimizes a risk-averse (or risk-seeking) measure of loss. We study the generalization properties of risk-sensitive learning schemes whose optimand is described via optimized certainty equivalents.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-15T05:25:02Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.