Common pitfalls to avoid while using multiobjective optimization in machine learning

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2405.01480v1
• Date: Thu, 2 May 2024 17:12:25 GMT
• Title: Common pitfalls to avoid while using multiobjective optimization in machine learning
• Authors: Junaid Akhter, Paul David Fährmann, Konstantin Sonntag, Sebastian Peitz,
• Abstract summary: There has been an increasing interest in exploring the application of multiobjective optimization (MOO) in machine learning (ML) Despite its potential, there is a noticeable lack of satisfactory literature that could serve as an entry-level guide for ML practitioners who want to use MOO. We critically review previous studies, particularly those involving MOO in deep learning (using Physics-Informed Neural Networks (PINNs) as a guiding example) and identify misconceptions that highlight the need for a better grasp of MOO principles in ML.
• Score: 1.2499537119440245
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Recently, there has been an increasing interest in exploring the application of multiobjective optimization (MOO) in machine learning (ML). The interest is driven by the numerous situations in real-life applications where multiple objectives need to be optimized simultaneously. A key aspect of MOO is the existence of a Pareto set, rather than a single optimal solution, which illustrates the inherent trade-offs between objectives. Despite its potential, there is a noticeable lack of satisfactory literature that could serve as an entry-level guide for ML practitioners who want to use MOO. Hence, our goal in this paper is to produce such a resource. We critically review previous studies, particularly those involving MOO in deep learning (using Physics-Informed Neural Networks (PINNs) as a guiding example), and identify misconceptions that highlight the need for a better grasp of MOO principles in ML. Using MOO of PINNs as a case study, we demonstrate the interplay between the data loss and the physics loss terms. We highlight the most common pitfalls one should avoid while using MOO techniques in ML. We begin by establishing the groundwork for MOO, focusing on well-known approaches such as the weighted sum (WS) method, alongside more complex techniques like the multiobjective gradient descent algorithm (MGDA). Additionally, we compare the results obtained from the WS and MGDA with one of the most common evolutionary algorithms, NSGA-II. We emphasize the importance of understanding the specific problem, the objective space, and the selected MOO method, while also noting that neglecting factors such as convergence can result in inaccurate outcomes and, consequently, a non-optimal solution. Our goal is to offer a clear and practical guide for ML practitioners to effectively apply MOO, particularly in the context of DL.

Related papers

• Unlearning as multi-task optimization: A normalized gradient difference approach with an adaptive learning rate [105.86576388991713]
  We introduce a normalized gradient difference (NGDiff) algorithm, enabling us to have better control over the trade-off between the objectives. We provide a theoretical analysis and empirically demonstrate the superior performance of NGDiff among state-of-the-art unlearning methods on the TOFU and MUSE datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-29T14:41:44Z)
• Many-Objective Evolutionary Influence Maximization: Balancing Spread, Budget, Fairness, and Time [3.195234044113248]
  The Influence Maximization (IM) problem seeks to discover the set of nodes in a graph that can spread the information propagation at most. This problem is known to be NP-hard, and it is usually studied by maximizing the influence (spread) and,Alternatively, optimizing a second objective. In this work, we propose a first case study where several IM-specific objective functions, namely budget fairness, communities, and time, are optimized on top of influence and minimization of the seed set size.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-27T16:54:45Z)
• Structured Pruning of Neural Networks for Constraints Learning [5.689013857168641]
  We show the effectiveness of pruning, one of these techniques, when applied to ANNs prior to their integration into MIPs. We conduct experiments using feed-forward neural networks with multiple layers to construct adversarial examples. Our results demonstrate that pruning offers remarkable reductions in solution times without hindering the quality of the final decision.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-14T16:36:49Z)
• Multi-Objective Hyperparameter Optimization in Machine Learning -- An Overview [10.081056751778712]
  We introduce the basics of multi-objective hyperparameter optimization and motivate its usefulness in applied ML. We provide an extensive survey of existing optimization strategies, both from the domain of evolutionary algorithms and Bayesian optimization. We illustrate the utility of MOO in several specific ML applications, considering objectives such as operating conditions, prediction time, sparseness, fairness, interpretability and robustness.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-15T10:23:19Z)
• Multi-Task Learning on Networks [0.0]
  Multi-objective optimization problems arising in the multi-task learning context have specific features and require adhoc methods. In this thesis the solutions in the Input Space are represented as probability distributions encapsulating the knowledge contained in the function evaluations. In this space of probability distributions, endowed with the metric given by the Wasserstein distance, a new algorithm MOEA/WST can be designed in which the model is not directly on the objective function.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-12-07T09:13:10Z)
• Efficient Model-Based Multi-Agent Mean-Field Reinforcement Learning [89.31889875864599]
  We propose an efficient model-based reinforcement learning algorithm for learning in multi-agent systems. Our main theoretical contributions are the first general regret bounds for model-based reinforcement learning for MFC. We provide a practical parametrization of the core optimization problem.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-07-08T18:01:02Z)
• MAML is a Noisy Contrastive Learner [72.04430033118426]
  Model-agnostic meta-learning (MAML) is one of the most popular and widely-adopted meta-learning algorithms nowadays. We provide a new perspective to the working mechanism of MAML and discover that: MAML is analogous to a meta-learner using a supervised contrastive objective function. We propose a simple but effective technique, zeroing trick, to alleviate such interference.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-29T12:52:26Z)
• On the Treatment of Optimization Problems with L1 Penalty Terms via Multiobjective Continuation [0.0]
  We present a novel algorithm that allows us to gain detailed insight into the effects of sparsity in linear and nonlinear optimization. Our method can be seen as a generalization of well-known homotopy methods for linear regression problems to the nonlinear case.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-12-14T13:00:50Z)
• Provable Multi-Objective Reinforcement Learning with Generative Models [98.19879408649848]
  We study the problem of single policy MORL, which learns an optimal policy given the preference of objectives. Existing methods require strong assumptions such as exact knowledge of the multi-objective decision process. We propose a new algorithm called model-based envelop value (EVI) which generalizes the enveloped multi-objective $Q$-learning algorithm.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-11-19T22:35:31Z)
• Dif-MAML: Decentralized Multi-Agent Meta-Learning [54.39661018886268]
  We propose a cooperative multi-agent meta-learning algorithm, referred to as MAML or Dif-MAML. We show that the proposed strategy allows a collection of agents to attain agreement at a linear rate and to converge to a stationary point of the aggregate MAML. Simulation results illustrate the theoretical findings and the superior performance relative to the traditional non-cooperative setting.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-06T16:51:09Z)
• On the Global Optimality of Model-Agnostic Meta-Learning [133.16370011229776]
  Model-a meta-learning (MAML) formulates meta-learning as a bilevel optimization problem, where the inner level solves each subtask based on a shared prior. We characterize optimality of the stationary points attained by MAML for both learning and supervised learning, where the inner-level outer-level problems are solved via first-order optimization methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-23T17:33:14Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.