On the Global Optimality of Model-Agnostic Meta-Learning

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2006.13182v1
• Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2020 17:33:14 GMT
• Title: On the Global Optimality of Model-Agnostic Meta-Learning
• Authors: Lingxiao Wang, Qi Cai, Zhuoran Yang, Zhaoran Wang
• Abstract summary: Model-a meta-learning (MAML) formulates meta-learning as a bilevel optimization problem, where the inner level solves each subtask based on a shared prior. We characterize optimality of the stationary points attained by MAML for both learning and supervised learning, where the inner-level outer-level problems are solved via first-order optimization methods.
• Score: 133.16370011229776
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Model-agnostic meta-learning (MAML) formulates meta-learning as a bilevel optimization problem, where the inner level solves each subtask based on a shared prior, while the outer level searches for the optimal shared prior by optimizing its aggregated performance over all the subtasks. Despite its empirical success, MAML remains less understood in theory, especially in terms of its global optimality, due to the nonconvexity of the meta-objective (the outer-level objective). To bridge such a gap between theory and practice, we characterize the optimality gap of the stationary points attained by MAML for both reinforcement learning and supervised learning, where the inner-level and outer-level problems are solved via first-order optimization methods. In particular, our characterization connects the optimality gap of such stationary points with (i) the functional geometry of inner-level objectives and (ii) the representation power of function approximators, including linear models and neural networks. To the best of our knowledge, our analysis establishes the global optimality of MAML with nonconvex meta-objectives for the first time.

Related papers

• A Stochastic Approach to Bi-Level Optimization for Hyperparameter Optimization and Meta Learning [74.80956524812714]
  We tackle the general differentiable meta learning problem that is ubiquitous in modern deep learning. These problems are often formalized as Bi-Level optimizations (BLO) We introduce a novel perspective by turning a given BLO problem into a ii optimization, where the inner loss function becomes a smooth distribution, and the outer loss becomes an expected loss over the inner distribution.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-14T12:10:06Z)
• Meta-Reinforcement Learning with Universal Policy Adaptation: Provable Near-Optimality under All-task Optimum Comparator [9.900800253949512]
  We develop a bilevel optimization framework for meta-RL (BO-MRL) to learn the meta-prior for task-specific policy adaptation. We empirically validate the correctness of the derived upper bounds and demonstrate the superior effectiveness of the proposed algorithm over benchmarks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-13T05:17:58Z)
• Deterministic Langevin Unconstrained Optimization with Normalizing Flows [3.988614978933934]
  We introduce a global, free surrogate optimization strategy for black-box functions inspired by the Fokker-Planck and Langevin equations. We demonstrate superior competitive progress toward objective optima on standard synthetic test functions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-01T17:46:20Z)
• Scalable PAC-Bayesian Meta-Learning via the PAC-Optimal Hyper-Posterior: From Theory to Practice [54.03076395748459]
  A central question in the meta-learning literature is how to regularize to ensure generalization to unseen tasks. We present a generalization bound for meta-learning, which was first derived by Rothfuss et al. We provide a theoretical analysis and empirical case study under which conditions and to what extent these guarantees for meta-learning improve upon PAC-Bayesian per-task learning bounds.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-14T08:51:04Z)
• Multi-Objective Meta Learning [2.9932638148627104]
  We propose a unified gradient-based Multi-Objective Meta Learning (MOML) framework. We show the effectiveness of the proposed MOML framework in several meta learning problems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-02-14T10:23:09Z)
• Meta-Learning with Neural Tangent Kernels [58.06951624702086]
  We propose the first meta-learning paradigm in the Reproducing Kernel Hilbert Space (RKHS) induced by the meta-model's Neural Tangent Kernel (NTK) Within this paradigm, we introduce two meta-learning algorithms, which no longer need a sub-optimal iterative inner-loop adaptation as in the MAML framework. We achieve this goal by 1) replacing the adaptation with a fast-adaptive regularizer in the RKHS; and 2) solving the adaptation analytically based on the NTK theory.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-02-07T20:53:23Z)
• Modeling and Optimization Trade-off in Meta-learning [23.381986209234164]
  We introduce and rigorously define the trade-off between accurate modeling and ease in meta-learning. Taking MAML as a representative metalearning algorithm, we theoretically characterize the trade-off for general non risk functions as well as linear regression. We also empirically solve a trade-off for metareinforcement learning benchmarks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-24T15:32:08Z)
• Theoretical Convergence of Multi-Step Model-Agnostic Meta-Learning [63.64636047748605]
  We develop a new theoretical framework to provide convergence guarantee for the general multi-step MAML algorithm. In particular, our results suggest that an inner-stage step needs to be chosen inversely proportional to $N$ of inner-stage steps in order for $N$ MAML to have guaranteed convergence.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-02-18T19:17:54Z)
• PACOH: Bayes-Optimal Meta-Learning with PAC-Guarantees [77.67258935234403]
  We provide a theoretical analysis using the PAC-Bayesian framework and derive novel generalization bounds for meta-learning. We develop a class of PAC-optimal meta-learning algorithms with performance guarantees and a principled meta-level regularization.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-02-13T15:01:38Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.